Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Clinical Comparison of Femtosecond Laser and Conventional Ultrasonic Emulsification Cataract Surgery

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/medsc.2023.040801 | Downloads: 8 | Views: 193


Bai Liang 1, Wang Qinmei 2


1 Eye Hospital, WMU Zhejiang Eye Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325027, China
2 Enshi Aier Eye Hospital, Enshi, Hubei, 445000, China

Corresponding Author

Wang Qinmei


Cataract is a common ophthalmic disease among the elderly population, which significantly affects their visual acuity. Therefore, effective measures need to be taken to treat cataracts, eliminate symptoms, and improve visual acuity. Traditional clinical approaches usually involve phacoemulsification, which yields moderate results. Thus, more effective treatment options are required to improve ocular indicators, corneal endothelial cell function, inflammatory markers in tears, and prevent complications. In this study, we compared the therapeutic effects and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with traditional phacoemulsification in cataract patients. The results indicated that femtosecond laser-assisted surgery yielded superior overall treatment outcomes and higher safety levels compared to traditional phacoemulsification. Therefore, implementing femtosecond laser surgery in cataract treatment can achieve the desired therapeutic results without significant complications, leading to significant improvements in patients' visual acuity.


Femtosecond laser surgery; Conventional ultrasonic emulsification; Cataract; Clinical outcomes; Safety


Bai Liang, Wang Qinmei, Clinical Comparison of Femtosecond Laser and Conventional Ultrasonic Emulsification Cataract Surgery. MEDS Clinical Medicine (2023) Vol. 4: 1-8. DOI:


[1] Abell R G, Kerr N M, Howie A R, et al. Effect of femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium[J]. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2014, 40(11): 1777-1783.
[2] Schroeter A, Kropp M, Cvejic Z, et al. Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted and ultrasound-assisted cataract surgery with focus on endothelial analysis[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(3): 996.
[3] Mayer W J, Klaproth O K, Hengerer F H, et al. Impact of crystalline lens opacification on effective phacoemulsification time in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery[J]. American journal of ophthalmology, 2014, 157(2): 426-432. e1.
[4] Abell R G, Kerr N M, Vote B J. Toward zero effective phacoemulsification time using femtosecond laser pretreatment[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120(5): 942-948.
[5] Nagy Z, Takacs A, Filkorn T, et al. Initial clinical evaluation of an intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery [J]. Journal of refractive surgery, 2009, 25(12): 1053-1060.
[6] Chen X, Yu Y, Song X, et al. Clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery for hard nuclear cataracts[J]. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2017, 43(4): 486-491.
[7] Van Nuffel S, Claeys M F, Claeys M H. Cystoid macular edema following cataract surgery with low-energy femtosecond laser versus conventional phacoemulsification[J]. Clinical ophthalmology, 2020: 2873-2878.
[8] Palanker D V, Blumenkranz M S, Andersen D, et al. Femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery with integrated optical coherence tomography[J]. Science translational medicine, 2010, 2(58): 58ra85-58ra85.
[9] Chen X, Xiao W, Ye S, et al. Efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification for cataract: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Scientific reports, 2015, 5(1): 13123.
[10] Oka Y, Sasaki N, Injev V P. Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification on endothelial cell density when using torsional modality[J]. Clinical Ophthalmology, 2021: 4227-4237.
[11] Nagy Z Z, Mastropasqua L, Knorz M C. The use of femtosecond lasers in cataract surgery: review of the published results with the LenSx system[J]. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2014, 30(11): 730-740.
[12] Day, A. C., Burr, J. M., Bennett, K., Bunce, C., Doré, C. J., Rubin, G. S., ... & Yang, Y. (2020). Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery (FACT): a randomized noninferiority trial. Ophthalmology, 127(8), 1012-1019.
[13] Yesilirmak, N., Diakonis, V. F., Batlle, J. F., Sayed-Ahmed, I. O., Davis, Z., Waren, D. P., ... & Donaldson, K. E. (2018). Comparison of phacoemulsification parameters between manual and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Canadian journal of ophthalmology, 53(5), 542-547.
[14] Ang R E T, Quinto M M S, Cruz E M, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification[J]. Eye and Vision, 2018, 5(1): 1-13.
[15] Schargus M, Suckert N, Schultz T, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery without OVD: a prospective intraindividual comparison[J]. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2015, 31(3): 146-152.
[16] Alio, J. L., Soria, F., & Abdou, A. A. (2014). Femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery followed by coaxial phacoemulsification or microincisional cataract surgery: differences and advantages. Current opinion in ophthalmology, 25(1), 81-88.
[17] Li S, Jie Y. Cataract surgery and lens implantation[J]. Current opinion in ophthalmology, 2019, 30(1): 39-43.
[18] Bu J J, Chung J, Afshari N A. Efficient use of ultrasound in cataract surgery[J]. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2022, 33(1): 41-46.
[19] Schultz T, Conrad-Hengerer I, Hengerer F H, et al. Intraocular pressure variation during femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery using a fluid-filled interface[J]. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2013, 39(1): 22-27.
[20] Lai K R, Zhang X B, Yu Y H, et al. Comparative clinical outcomes of Tecnis toric IOL implantation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification surgery[J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, 13(1): 49.

Downloads: 3909
Visits: 170321

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.