Decoding the Thucydides Trap: A Critical Examination of China's Military Capabilities
DOI: 10.23977/polsr.2024.050101 | Downloads: 46 | Views: 731
Author(s)
Lufei Wu 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
Corresponding Author
Lufei WuABSTRACT
This paper delves into the rise of China and examines the "China Threat" and "Thucydides Trap" discourse, which examines the possibility of military conflict between China and the US. As China's economy has boomed, surpassing Japan and nearing the United States in GDP, Washington's concern over its global influence have intensified. Graham Allison's "Thucydides Trap" theory posits a risk of war during power transitions, igniting debates on the likelihood of China threat and Sino-US conflict. However, dissenting voices argue that China's rise lacks evidence of expansionist aims and capability, emphasizing the prospects for peaceful coexistence. The paper explores China's military modernization efforts, revealing a substantial gap with the US. Examining naval, aerial, and missile capabilities, it underscores China's cautious defensive strategy, constrained by economic considerations and regional alliances. It also argues that while concerns and tensions exist, the likelihood of confrontation in the next decade remains low due to China's current military gap with the United States. Beyond the conventional narrative of the "Thucydides Trap," the paper contributes a military perspective to the discourse on China's rise and its potential implications, navigating.
KEYWORDS
The rise of China, United States, Thucydides Trap, military capabilitiesCITE THIS PAPER
Lufei Wu, Decoding the Thucydides Trap: A Critical Examination of China's Military Capabilities. Journal of Political Science Research (2024) Vol. 5: 1-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/polsr.2024.050101.
REFERENCES
[1] World Bank. (2023). China Overview: Development news, research, data. https://www.worldbank.org/ en/country/ china/overview
[2] Johnston, A. I. (2003). Is China a Status Quo Power? International Security, 27(4), 5–56.
[3] Layne, C. (2020). Hyping the China Threat. National Interest, 169, 21–31.
[4] Graham Allison. (2015, September 24). Destined for War: Can China and the United States Escape Thucydides's Trap? - The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/ 2015/09/united-states-china- war-thucydides- trap/406756/
[5] Peters, M. A., Green, B., Mou, C., Hollings, S., Ogunniran, M. O., Rizvi, F., Rider, S., & Tierney, R. (2022). US–China Rivalry and 'Thucydides' Trap': Why this is a misleading account. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(10), 1501–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1799739
[6] Yaqing, Q. (2010). International Society as a Process: Institutions, Identities, and China's Peaceful Rise. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3(2), 129–153.
[7] Wuthnow, J., & Fravel, M. T. (2022). China's military strategy for a 'new era': Some change, more continuity, and tantalizing hints. Journal of Strategic Studies, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2022.2043850
[8] Foxwell, D. (2022). New Carrier Catapults China Further into a New Era. Warship Technology, 5–5.
[9] Han, X., Sadler, M., & Quek, K. (2021). Guns and Butter in China: How Chinese Citizens Respond to Military Spending. The China Quarterly, 245, 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741020000260
[10] Robertson, P. E. (2022). The Real Military Balance: International Comparisons of Defense Spending. Review of Income and Wealth, 68(3), 797–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12536
[11] Shan, Y., & Huang, D. (2021). Analysis of the operational characteristics of the US Aircraft Carrier Battle Group. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1721(1), 012064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1721/1/012064
[12] Liff, A. P., & Ikenberry, G. J. (2014). Racing toward Tragedy? China's Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma. International Security, 39(2), 52–91.
[13] Wong, W. K. O. (2021). First Strike Hypersonic Weapons: The End of the "MAD" Doctrine and Peace for Our Time? Pacific Focus, 36(3), 343–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12199
Downloads: | 1668 |
---|---|
Visits: | 72510 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Science of Law Journal
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting