Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

An overview of the differences and comparisons between timber(CLT) and reinforced concrete structural houses

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jmpd.2024.080212 | Downloads: 14 | Views: 795

Author(s)

Sitong Su 1

Affiliation(s)

1 The Univerisity of Sheffield, Shefffield, S10 2TN, UK

Corresponding Author

Sitong Su

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an overview comparing the two types of building structures in terms of carbon emissions (sustainability issues), cost, structural characteristics, force mechanics analysis, effects of earthquakes on the structure and post-disaster reconstruction. In order to compare wood and reinforced concrete structures more intuitively, visual comparisons will be made through the actual existence and data of the building, and reasonably speculated how to solve the advantages and disadvantages of these two materials.

KEYWORDS

Timber, reinforced concrete, structural analysis, sustainable development

CITE THIS PAPER

Sitong Su, An overview of the differences and comparisons between timber(CLT) and reinforced concrete structural houses. Journal of Materials, Processing and Design (2024) Vol. 8: 101-107. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jmpd.2024.080212.

REFERENCES

[1] Cross laminated timber (CLT): Overview and development. (2016, January 19). SpringerLink. https://link. springer.com/article/10.1007/s00107-015-0999-5
[2] Baidu Security Verification. (n.d.). https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1759248300493981448&wfr=spider&for=pc
[3] Cross-laminated timber in the USA: Opportunity for hardwoods? (2018, January 30). SpringerLink. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40725-018-0071-x
[4] Life cycle assessment (LCA) of cross-laminated timber (CLT) produced in western Washington: The role of logistics and wood species mix. (2019, February 28). MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1278
[5] Moser, R.D., Singh, P.M., Kahn, L.F., Kurtis, K., 2012. The chloride-induced corrosion resistance of high-strength stainless steels in simulated alkaline and carbonated concrete pore solutions. Corrosion Sci. 57 (2), 41e53.
[6] Jefferies, H. 2016. United States Inventory and Harvest Trends on Privately-Owned Timberlands. National Alliance for For-est Owners. Available at https://www.forest2market.com/hubfs/2016_Website/Documents/ 20160620_Forest2 Mar-ket_ Inventory_and_Harvest_Trends.pdf?t=1492024394667. Last access August 2017.
[7] Tsai, M.-T., & Lin, W.-T. (2021, December 27). Efficiency of energy consumption between reinforced concrete structure and cross-laminated timber based hybrid structure in East Asian cities. MDPI. https://www. mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/165 
[8] Lippke, B., Wilson, J., Perez-Garcia, J., Bowyer, J., and Meil, J. 2004. Life Cycle Environmental Performance of Renewable Building Materials. Forest Products Journal. 54(6):8-19
[9] Haibo, G.; Ying, L.; Yiping, M.; Haoyu, H.; Cheng, S.; Yu, S. A Comparison of the Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction Performance between Reinforced Concrete and Cross-Laminated Timber Structures in Residential Buildings in the Severe Cold Region of China. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1. [Google Scholar]
[10] Khavari, A.M.; Pei, S.; Tabares-Velasco, P.C. Energy Consumption Analysis of Multistory Cross-Laminated Timber Residential Buildings: A comparative study. J. Archit. Eng. 2016, 22, 04016002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[11] Page restricted. (n.d.). Page restricted ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S235 2012420304616

Downloads: 3785
Visits: 225169

Sponsors, Associates, and Links


All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.