Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Differential Effects of Soil-Structure Interaction on Seismometer Recordings

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jceup.2025.070119 | Downloads: 9 | Views: 298

Author(s)

Shaobo Han 1, Pengliang Ren 1

Affiliation(s)

1 College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China

Corresponding Author

Shaobo Han

ABSTRACT

China is situated in a seismically active zone, necessitating urgent improvements in earthquake disaster prevention and mitigation capabilities. To address the distortion of seismic motion recordings caused by soil-structure interaction (SSI) in low-rise residential buildings equipped with seismometers, this study establishes an integrated finite element model of a soft soil site, shallow foundation, and three-story reinforced concrete frame structure based on seismometer deployment characteristics in the Ya'an region. Four real seismic ground motion records were selected for numerical simulations of vertically incident SV waves, comparing acceleration response differences between structural monitoring points and free-field surface conditions. Key findings include:(1) Acceleration peaks at structural foundations and lower-story wall monitoring points show minimal differences but significant deviations from free-field recordings, with masonry infill walls dominating low-story acceleration distribution;(2) SSI-induced amplification/attenuation effects on structural acceleration responses are modulated by seismic spectral characteristics, showing 1.25× amplification in the structural natural frequency range (0.2–0.6 s) and high-frequency attenuation (>15 Hz) due to soil filtering;(3) Acceleration response spectra exhibit notable enhancement within the structural characteristic period range (0.2–0.6 s), indicating selective amplification of short-period seismic motions by residential buildings;(4) Site flexibility exacerbates high-frequency filtering, while instrumental intensity deviations primarily arise from coupled seismic motion characteristics, structural parameters, and site conditions, with SSI alone contributing minimally to intensity assessment. These results provide theoretical foundations for optimizing seismometer deployment and revising earthquake early warning systems.

KEYWORDS

Soil-Structure Interaction; Seismometer; Integrated Finite Element Method; Spectral Analysis

CITE THIS PAPER

Shaobo Han, Pengliang Ren, Differential Effects of Soil-Structure Interaction on Seismometer Recordings. Journal of Civil Engineering and Urban Planning (2025) Vol. 7: 173-181. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jceup.2025.070119.

REFERENCES

[1] Liu Y H, Song J D, Li Y S. ShakeAlert: development of the United States West Coast earthquake early warning system[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2020,40(06): 61-70.
[2] Bao Y T, Wang P X, Xu M C, et al. Current status and latest progress of Japan's earthquake early warning system[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2024,40(03): 72-82.
[3] Li F. Construction of general stations for seismic intensity rapid reporting and early warning based on communication base stations[J]. Modern Transmission, 2023(3): 69-72.
[4] CAMPBELL K W. Effects of site characteristics on near-source recordings of strong ground motion[C]//. Workshop on Site-Specific Effects of Soil and Rock on Ground Motion and the Implications for Earthquake-Resistant Design, Santa Fe, NM, USA, 1983. 
[5] STEWART J P, SEED R B, FENVES G L. Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction in Buildings. II: Empirical Findings [J]. 1999,125(1): 38-48.
[6] PANDEY B H, LIAM FINN W D, VENTURA C E. Modification of Free-Field Motions by Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction for Shallow Foundations[C]//. Proc. of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, 2012. 
[7] SOTIRIADIS D, KLIMIS N, MARGARIS B, et al. Influence of structure–foundation–soil interaction on ground motions recorded within buildings[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2019,17(11): 5867-5895.
[8] SOTIRIADIS D, KLIMIS N, MARGARIS B, et al. Analytical expressions relating free-field and foundation ground motions in buildings with basement, considering soil-structure interaction[J]. Engineering Structures, 2020,216: 110757. 
[9] SOTIRIADIS D, KLIMIS N, MARGARIS B, et al. Improved correlation between foundation and free‐field ground motions through strong motion recordings and kinematic soil–structure interaction analyses[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2022,51(4): 725-743.
[10] NTINALEXIS M, BOMMER J J, RUIGROK E, et al. Ground-motion networks in the Groningen field: usability and consistency of surface recordings[J]. Journal of Seismology, 2019,23(6): 1233-1253.
[11] Zhou B F, Song Q, Ren Y F, et al. The Study on the Influence and Application of Foundation Pier Height on Strong Motion Records[J]. Earth Science, 2024,49(2): 414-424.
[12] LIANG J, FU J, TODOROVSKA M I, et al. Effects of site dynamic characteristics on soil–structure interaction (II): Incident P and SV waves[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013,51: 58-76.
[13] Liang Y W, Yang L J, Han Bet al. Effects of the soil nonlinearity on dynamic soil-structure interaction:A case study of Millikan library building[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2022,42(3): 10.
[14] PITILAKIS K D, KARAPETROU S T, FOTOPOULOU S D. Consideration of aging and SSI effects on seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2014,12(4): 1755-1776.
[15] KARAPETROU S T, FOTOPOULOU S D, PITILAKIS K D. Seismic vulnerability assessment of high-rise non-ductile RC buildings considering soil–structure interaction effects[J]. Soil Dynam Earthq Eng, 2015,73: 42-57.
[16] CAVALIERI F, CORREIA A A, PINHO R. Variations between foundation-level recordings and free-field earthquake ground motions: numerical study at soft-soil sites[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021,141: 106511.
[17] Liu J B, Wang Z Y, Du X L, et al. Three-dimensional visco-elastic artificial boundaries in time domain for wave motion problems[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2005,22(6): 46-51. 

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.