Empirical Analysis on the Validity of Unilateral Court Selection Agreements
DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040508 | Downloads: 0 | Views: 24
Author(s)
Zhao Xiaoyang 1
Affiliation(s)
1 Faculty of Law, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, No.1 Jinji Road, Guilin, China
Corresponding Author
Zhao XiaoyangABSTRACT
The agreement stipulating that "disputes shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the people's court designated by XX" represents the outcome of party autonomy, with "the people's court designated by XX" constituting one method for parties to select a court of jurisdiction. Through this agreement, the parties grant XX the right to designate the People's Court. This arrangement does not violate the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law concerning statutory and exclusive jurisdiction, nor does it restrict or exclude the counterparty's right to select a court of jurisdiction. The following primary issues exist in determining the validity of unilateral court selection agreements in China: First, interpretations of "the people's court designated by XX" are overly confined to literal meanings. Second, courts sometimes issue surprise rulings when adjudicating the validity of unilateral court-selection agreements.
KEYWORDS
Unilateral Choice of Court; Validity Determination of Agreements; Surprise Rulings; Duty to ExplainCITE THIS PAPER
Zhao Xiaoyang. Empirical Analysis on the Validity of Unilateral Court Selection Agreements. Science of Law Journal (2025) Vol. 4: 56-60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040508.
REFERENCES
[1] Wang Liming: Research on Contract Law, Volume I (3rd Edition), China Renmin University Press, 2015, p. 465.
[2] Supreme People's Court Gazette No. 12, 2007.
[3] Long Zongzhi: "Research on Preventing Surprise Judgments in Criminal Proceedings," in Political and Legal Forum, No. 4, 2022, p. 58.
[4] Yang Yanyan: "On Preventing Surprise Judgments in Civil Litigation: Focusing on the Application of Modern Trial Theory," in China Juris, No. 4, 2016, p. 269.
[5] Yang Yihong: "Litigious Surprise: Preliminary Exploration of an Issue," in Hebei Law Review, No. 12, 2011, p.154.
[6] Wang Hui: "On Judges' Duty to Explain Changes to Claims," in Hebei Law Review, No. 11, 2015, p. 156.
| Downloads: | 14516 |
|---|---|
| Visits: | 509820 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting

Download as PDF