Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Value–Actor–Procedure: An Analysis of the Legitimacy of Racially Discriminatory Policies under the Trump Administration

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/polsr.2025.060117 | Downloads: 3 | Views: 37

Author(s)

Haochang Feng 1, Liping Tang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Donghua University, Shanghai, 200051, China

Corresponding Author

Haochang Feng

ABSTRACT

Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, has been widely characterized as a racist who unabashedly promoted white supremacist views and repeatedly targeted immigrants and ethnic minorities. During his two terms in office, he enacted numerous racist policies that precipitated a surge of racial tensions across the country. This paper examines the legitimacy of these policies by developing a three‑dimensional analytical framework—value legitimacy, actor legitimacy, and procedural legitimacy—and applying it to an in‑depth evaluation of Trump's racist measures. In terms of value legitimacy, these policies exhibited low efficiency, failed to uphold principles of fairness and justice, exacerbated racial inequality, and undermined the common good. With respect to actor legitimacy, they lacked broad social support during implementation, provoked strong opposition—particularly from minority communities—and destabilized social cohesion. Concerning procedural legitimacy, the policy‑making process was marked by a lack of transparency and public participation, violated the rule‑of‑law principles, and thereby weakened the policies' standing. A comprehensive analysis demonstrates that deficits in all three dimensions of legitimacy deepened societal divisions and polarization in the United States and had adverse effects on both Trump's electoral prospects and governance.

KEYWORDS

Policy Legitimacy; Trump 2.0; Racism; U.S. Politics; Racial Policies

CITE THIS PAPER

Haochang Feng, Liping Tang, Value–Actor–Procedure: An Analysis of the Legitimacy of Racially Discriminatory Policies under the Trump Administration. Journal of Political Science Research (2025) Vol. 6: 121-127. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/polsr.2025.060117.

REFERENCES

[1] Rogier C. "China's Social Credit System: An Evolving Practice of Control." Ssrn Electronic Journal, 2018.
[2] Weerts, Sophie. "The law and the principle of legality." Swiss public Administration, 2019, 69. 
[3] Easton D. A systems analysis of political life. University of Chicago Press, 1965, 258.
[4] Isom D., Boerhme H., Cann D., Wilson A. "The White Right: A gendered look at the links between 'Victim' ideology and anti-Black Lives Matter sentiments in the era of Trump." Criminal Sociology, 2021(48), 1-26.
[5] Valentino, Nicholas A., Neuner, Fabian G., Vandenbroek L.M. "The Changing Norms of Racial Political Rhetoric and the End of Racial Priming." The Journal of Politics, Vol.80, No.3, 2017, 756-758.
[6] Salem A.K., Lutfi N.A., and Hussein, A.L. "Legitimizing Racism: Critical Discourse Analysis of White Supremacy in Trump's Political Speeches." International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 2021, 4, 157-165.
[7] Beetham, David. "Political Legitimacy." In The Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, edited by Kate Nash and Alan Scott, 107-116. Oxford: Blackwells, 2004.
[8] Huntington Samuel P. Who Are We? The Challenges to America's National Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2005.
[9] Marco G., Guillaume P. "Global Racist Contagion Following Donald Trump's Election." British Journal of Political Science, 2019, 51, 1-8.
[10] Castells M. "Networks of outrage and hope", polity press, 2012, 5, 633-636.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.