TaTME vs. LapTME in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: Mid-term Outcomes and Selection Strategies
DOI: 10.23977/medsc.2025.060517 | Downloads: 4 | Views: 18
Author(s)
Chen Su 1, Hongyu Zhang 1
Affiliation(s)
1 The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
Corresponding Author
Hongyu ZhangABSTRACT
For mid-to-low rectal cancer (tumors ≤12 cm from the anal verge), total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the cornerstone of curative surgery. While laparoscopic TME (LapTME) is a well-established minimally invasive technique, transanal TME (TaTME) was developed to address the technical challenges of operating in a narrow pelvis. Current evidence shows no statistically significant difference in 3-year local recurrence rates between TaTME and LapTME in large, well-designed studies. Similarly, the two techniques demonstrate comparable outcomes in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Particularly for low rectal cancer, some studies even suggest that TaTME may show potential advantages in reducing the risk of death and disease recurrence. Additionally, TaTME has demonstrated benefits in specific scenarios—for example, in cases of low-lying tumors, it may help improve circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity rates and reduce the need for conversion to open surgery. However, certain considerations must be addressed with TaTME, such as its unique learning curve effect. In summary, when performed by experienced surgeons, TaTME and LapTME can achieve equivalent 3-year local control and survival outcomes for mid-to-low rectal cancer. TaTME is a valuable option, especially in anatomically challenging cases, but its adoption requires careful attention to the learning curve and patient selection. Regardless of the surgical approach, the ultimate goal remains obtaining a high-quality TME specimen.
KEYWORDS
Rectal Cancer, Total Mesorectal Excision, TaTME, LapTME, Local Recurrence, Survival Outcomes, Minimally Invasive SurgeryCITE THIS PAPER
Chen Su, Hongyu Zhang, TaTME vs. LapTME in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: Mid-term Outcomes and Selection Strategies. MEDS Clinical Medicine (2025) Vol. 6: 115-120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/medsc.2025.060517.
REFERENCES
[1] Bülow S, Christensen I J, Harling H, et al. Recurrence and survival after mesorectal excision for rectal Cancer [J]. British Journal of Surgery, 2003, 90(8): 974–980.
[2] Köckerling F, Reymond M A, Altendorf-Hofmann A, et al. Influence of surgery on metachronous distant metastases and survival in rectal Cancer. [J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998, 16(1): 324–329.
[3] Dittrich L, Biebl M, Schmuck R, et al. Initial Experience with the Safe Implementation of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) as a Standardized Procedure for Low Rectal Cancer [J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2020, 10(1): 72.
[4] Roodbeen S X, Spinelli A, Bemelman W A, et al. Local Recurrence After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer [J]. Annals of Surgery, 2020, 274(2): 359–366.
[5] Zeng, Z., Luo, S., Zhang, H., Wu, M., Ma, D., Wang, Q., Xie, M., Xu, Q., Ouyang, J., Xiao, Y., Song, Y., Feng, B., Xu, Q., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Shi, L., Ling, L., Zhang, X., Huang, L., Yang, Z., … Chinese Transanal Endoscopic Surgery Collaborative (CTESC) Group (2025). Transanal vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision and 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Rectal Cancer: The TaLaR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 333(9), 774–783. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.24276
[6] Zeng Z, Liu Z, Luo S, et al. Three-year outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision versus standard laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal Cancer [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 36(6): 3902–3910.
[7] De Lacy F B, Roodbeen S X, Ríos J, et al. Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: A multicenter comparative Analysis [J]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1).
[8] Gioia P, Gloor S, Troller R, et al. Rate of local recurrence in a cohort of 125 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision due to rectal Cancer [J]. British Journal of Surgery, 2021, 108(Supplement_4).
[9] González-Abós C, De Lacy F B, Guzmán Y, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for stage II or III rectal cancer: Pattern of local recurrence in a tertiary referral Center [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35(12): 7191–7199.
[10] Veltcamp Helbach M, Koedam T W A, Knol J J, et al. Residual mesorectum on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME) in rectal Cancer [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 33(1): 94–102.
[11] Ye J, Tian Y, Li F, et al. Comparison of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer: A case matched Study [J]. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 47(5): 1019–1025.
[12] Li Z, Xiao J, Hou Y, et al. Transanal versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in Male Patients with Low Tumor Location after Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study [J]. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2022, 2022: 1–10.
[13] Chen Y-T, Kiu K-T, Yen M-H, et al. Comparison of the Short-term outcomes in lower rectal cancer using three different surgical techniques: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TME), laparoscopic TME, and open TME [J]. Asian Journal of Surgery, 2019, 42(6): 674–680.
[14] Roodbeen S X, Penna M, Mackenzie H, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis of oncological Outcomes [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 33(8): 2459–2467.
[15] Li Z, Liu H, Luo S, et al. Long-term oncological outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer: A retrospective analysis of 2502 Patients [J]. International Journal of Surgery, 2023, 110(3): 1611–1619.
[16] Kang L, Zeng Z, Luo S, et al. Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: A multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (TaLaR trial) Protocol [J]. Gastroenterology Report, 2020, 9(1): 71–76.
[17] Ji Won Park et al.Comparison of long-term survival outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery for mid or low rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy: 7-year follow-up of COREAN trial.. J Clin Oncol 35, 3518 (2017).DOI:10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.3518
[18] Yi, X., Zhang, X., Li, Q., & Ouyang, J. (2023). Comparing perioperative and oncological outcomes of transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective studies. Surgical Endoscopy, 37(12), 9228–9243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10495-y
[19] Serra-Aracil X, Zarate A, Bargalló J, et al. Transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer (Ta-LaTME study): Multicentre, randomized, open-label Trial [J]. British Journal of Surgery, 2022, 110(2): 150–158.
[20] Liu Z-H, Zeng Z-W, Jie H-Q, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision combined with intersphincteric resection has similar Long-term oncological outcomes to laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort Study [J]. Gastroenterology Report, 2022, 10.
[21] Rubinkiewicz M, Zarzycki P, Witowski J, et al. Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: Comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision [J]. BMC Surgery, 2019, 19(1).
[22] Rubinkiewicz M, Nowakowski M, Wierdak M, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: A case-matched study comparing TaTME versus standard laparoscopic TME [J]. Cancer Management and Research, 2018, Volume 10: 5239–5245.
[23] Marks J H, Montenegro G A, Salem J F, et al. Transanal TATA/TME: A case-matched study of taTME versus laparoscopic TME surgery for rectal Cancer [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2016, 20(7): 467–473.
[24] Detering R, Roodbeen SX, van Oostendorp SE, et al. Three-Year Nationwide Experience with Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer in the Netherlands: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;228(3):235-244. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.016
[25] Ren J, Liu S, Luo H, et al. Comparison of Short-term efficacy of transanal total mesorectal excision and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in low rectal Cancer [J]. Asian Journal of Surgery, 2021, 44(1): 181–185.
[26] Perdawood S K, Thinggaard B S, Bjoern M X. Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open Surgeries [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 32(5): 2312–2321.
[27] Jootun R, Cuk P, Ellebæk M, et al. Robotic vs. TaTME Rectal Surgery (ROTA STUDY) Matched Cohort Trial for Mid to Low Rectal Cancer Surgery Evaluation Trial in the Hands of an Experienced Surgeon [J]. International Journal of Surgery Protocols, 2022, 26(1): 7–13.
[28] Aubert M, Mege D, Panis Y. Total mesorectal excision for low and middle rectal cancer: Laparoscopic versus transanal approach—a meta-Analysis [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 34(9): 3908–3919.
[29] Munini M, Popeskou S G, Galetti K, et al. Transanal (TaTME) vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis of early and long-term Outcomes [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021, 36(10): 2271–2279.
[30] Ong G KB, Tsai B, Patron R L, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision achieves equivalent oncologic resection compared to laparoscopic approach, but with functional Consequences [J]. The American Journal of Surgery, 2021, 221(3): 566–569.
[31] Lin Y-C, Kuo Y-T, You J-F, et al. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Lower Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis [J]. Cancers, 2022, 14(17): 4098.
[32] Flynn J, Larach J T, Kong J C H, et al. The learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A systematic Review [J]. Colorectal Disease, 2021, 23(11): 2806–2820.
[33] Perdawood S K, Kroeigaard J, Eriksen M, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision: The Slagelse experience 2013–2019 [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 35(2): 826–836.
[34] Xiao Zhang, Jiang Chen, Feng He, Wenchun Du, Xianhe Li, Xianhao Yu, Comparing efficacy and safety of transanal vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer: Updated meta-analysis, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Volume 51, Issue 3, 2025, 109559.
| Downloads: | 10067 |
|---|---|
| Visits: | 678021 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Neurobiology and Genetics
-
Medical Imaging and Nuclear Medicine
-
Bacterial Genetics and Ecology
-
Transactions on Cancer
-
Journal of Biophysics and Ecology
-
Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary
-
Academic Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
-
Transactions on Cell and Developmental Biology
-
Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology
-
Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
-
Hematology and Stem Cell
-
Journal of Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Engineering
-
MEDS Basic Medicine
-
MEDS Stomatology
-
MEDS Public Health and Preventive Medicine
-
MEDS Chinese Medicine
-
Journal of Enzyme Engineering
-
Advances in Industrial Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
-
Bacteriology and Microbiology
-
Advances in Physiology and Pathophysiology
-
Journal of Vision and Ophthalmology
-
Frontiers of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
Digestive Disease and Diabetes
-
Advances in Immunology and Vaccines
-
Nanomedicine and Drug Delivery
-
Cardiology and Vascular System
-
Pediatrics and Child Health
-
Journal of Reproductive Medicine and Contraception
-
Journal of Respiratory and Lung Disease
-
Journal of Bioinformatics and Biomedicine

Download as PDF