Nonlinear Residual Prediction Method for Site Based on Lasso Regression and Monte Carlo Sampling
DOI: 10.23977/jceup.2026.080118 | Downloads: 3 | Views: 63
Author(s)
Wang Yushi 1,2, Chen Zelong 1
Affiliation(s)
1 College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China
2 Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100124, China
Corresponding Author
Chen ZelongABSTRACT
Local ground effects exert significant modulation on seismic motion characteristics. Traditional one-dimensional equivalent linearization methods exhibit severe high-frequency "over-damping" phenomena under strong earthquake strains, while quantifying nonlinear residual responses remains challenging due to multidimensional coupling effects from seismic sources, paths, and spectral characteristics. Leveraging massive strong ground motion records from Japan's KiK-net network, this study proposes a machine learning-based approach for nonlinear system deviation prediction and uncertainty quantification through feature dimensionality reduction and probabilistic sampling. First, 15 multidimensional physical parameters encompassing seismic sources, paths, and ground motion responses were extracted. The Lasso regression algorithm (with L1 regularization) was employed for dynamic feature ±1optimization and dimensionality reduction to construct a multivariable nonlinear residual prediction model. Residual prediction was further implemented using Monte Carlo (MC) sampling combined with Jaccard similarity index. Results demonstrate that dominant nonlinear residual parameters exhibit distinct frequency-dependent behaviors: high-frequency components are controlled by input intensity (e.g., peak response spectra under underground conditions), while mid-to-long periods are governed by spectral evolution characteristics (e.g., average period). Compared to traditional single-parameter empirical models, the Lasso multivariable model significantly improves full-cycle prediction accuracy. MC-sampled multiple standard deviations objectively reconstruct ground response uncertainties while maintaining high Jaccard similarity with real observation datasets. This study effectively compensates for high-frequency energy misconsumption in one-dimensional theories, providing a reliable data-driven approach for accurate residual estimation.
KEYWORDS
Field Effect; Equivalent Linearization; Lasso Regression; Residual AnalysisCITE THIS PAPER
Wang Yushi, Chen Zelong. Nonlinear Residual Prediction Method for Site Based on Lasso Regression and Monte Carlo Sampling. Journal of Civil Engineering and Urban Planning (2026). Vol. 8, No.1, 181-191. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jceup.2026.080118.
REFERENCES
[1] Borcherdt R D. Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1970, 60(1): 29-61.
[2] Andrews, D.J. (1986). Objective determination of source parameters and similarity of earthquakes of different size. Earthquake Source Mechanics.
[3] Steidl, J.H., Tumarkin, A.G., & Archuleta, R.J. (1996). What is a reference site? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86(6), 1733-1748.
[4] Shi Y, Asimaki D. A hysteretic–hyperbolic model for site response analysis[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2017, 46(13): 2137-2155.
[5] Mayne P W, Schneider J A, Martin G K. Small-and large-strain soil properties from seismic flat dilatometer tests[C]//Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on Pre-Failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials. 1999: 419-427.
[6] Ladd C C. Stability evaluation during staged construction[J]. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 1991, 117(4): 540-615.
[7] Darendeli M B. Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves[M]. The university of Texas at Austin, 2001.
[8] Zalachoris, Georgios. Evaluation of one-dimensional siteresponse methodologies using borehole arrays. Diss. 2014.
[9] Matasović N, Vucetic M. Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1993, 119(11): 1805-1822.
[10] Shi, J., Asimaki, D., Li, W., & Xia, F. (2025). PySeismoSoil: A Python library for 1D seismic site response analysis (Version v0.6.3) [Computer software]. Zenodo.
[11] Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1996, 58(1): 267-288.
[12] Liu J S, Liu J S. Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing[M]. New York: springer, 2001.
[13] Jaccard P. Distribution de la flore alpine dans le bassin des Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines[J]. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Nat, 1901, 37: 241-272.
| Downloads: | 13871 |
|---|---|
| Visits: | 554060 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Sustainable Development and Green Buildings
-
Landscape and Urban Horticulture
-
Bridge and Structural Engineering
-
Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
-
Journal of Municipal Engineering
-
Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning
-
Indoor Air Quality and Climate
-
Computer Aided Architecture Design

Download as PDF