Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Empowerment Mechanism of Intangible Cultural Heritage Embedding on ESG Performance of Rural PPP Projects: Weight Decomposition and Cross-Type Comparative Analysis

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/ieim.2026.090109 | Downloads: 0 | Views: 46

Author(s)

Jyh-Harng Shyng 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Life Sciences College, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, China

Corresponding Author

Jyh-Harng Shyng

ABSTRACT

Existing ESG evaluation research on rural PPP rarely separates cultural indicators for targeted mechanism analysis, yet entropy calculation based on 58 Guangdong rural PPP samples proves that intangible cultural heritage (S5) carries the highest weight (13.547%) among all 20 ESG indicators. To unpack the heterogeneous empowerment effect of cultural embedding across project categories, this paper divides samples into three groups: wetland park PPP, water ecological governance PPP, and rural sanitation PPP. This study adopts entropy weight decomposition to quantify the marginal contribution of S5 to overall ESG score, and uses TOPSIS coefficient inter-group difference test to compare performance gaps between projects with heritage layout and non-heritage layout. The results show that intangible cultural heritage embedding significantly lifts comprehensive ESG performance; wetland PPP gains the largest cultural premium, followed by water governance projects, while sanitation PPP shows weak cultural spillover. The channel test verifies that heritage embedding improves social trust and public participation (G5), and indirectly optimizes environmental operation input. This paper supplements the micro-mechanism of cultural elements in rural sustainable infrastructure and puts forward differentiated cultural embedding strategies for three types of PPP projects.

KEYWORDS

Intangible Cultural Heritage(ICH); Rural PPP; ESG Performance; Entropy Weight Decomposition; TOPSIS Group Comparison; Cultural Empowerment

CITE THIS PAPER

Jyh-Harng Shyng. Empowerment Mechanism of Intangible Cultural Heritage Embedding on ESG Performance of Rural PPP Projects: Weight Decomposition and Cross-Type Comparative Analysis. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management (2026). Vol. 9, No.1, 86-91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ieim.2026.090109.

REFERENCES

[1] LEI F Y L W G. Spatial Characteristics and Driving Factors of Public–Private Partnership Projects Implemented in China[J/OL]. Buildings, 2022. DOI:10.3390/buildings12060768. 
[2] O’RIORDAN C R C P S S V S J C S J. Assessing the ability of rural agrarian areas to provide cultural ecosystem services (CES): A multi scale social indicator framework (MSIF)[J/OL]. LAND USE POLICY, 2016. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.024. 
[3] ZHANG S Z X H F. Investigating the Sustainability Performance of PPP-Type Infrastructure Projects: A Case of China[J/OL]. Sustainability, 2018. DOI:10.3390/su10114162. 
[4] WAN G, ZHANG J, ZENG T, et al. Multidimensional energy poverty and its urban-rural and regional disparities: Evidence from China[J/OL]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 466: 142874. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142874. 
[5] DAI J, JIANG S, CHENG Z. Exploring the Applicability of the PPP in Tourist Toilets: Reflections on the Laoshan Case in China[J/OL]. Buildings, 2023. DOI:10.3390/buildings13030790. 
[6] AOUADNI S, REBAI A, TURSKIS Z. The Meaningful Mixed Data TOPSIS (TOPSIS-MMD) Method and its Application in Supplier Selection[J/OL]. Studies in Informatics and Control, 2017. DOI:10.24846/v26i3y201711. 
[7] Liu, Shu hu, Wu, Lin, Dai, Wenyuan. Revitalizing Rural Landscapes: Applying Cultural Landscape Gene Theory for Sustainable Spatial Planning in Linpu Village[J/OL]. Buildings, 2024. DOI:10.3390/buildings14082396. 
[8] RASMUSSEN L V, FOLD N, OLESEN R S, et al. Socio-economic outcomes of ecological infrastructure investments[J/OL]. Ecosystem Services, 2021, 47: 101242. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101242. 
[9] TABASCO J P, SANCHEZ M H M. Integration Versus Fragmentation, the Role of Minor Rural Networks in Rural Cultural Landscapes. A Study-Case in Spain[J/OL]. Sustainability, 2021. DOI:10.3390/su13094765. 
[10] ZHOU T Y. Community, governments and external capitals in China's rural cultural tourism: A comparative study of two adjacent villages[J/OL]. Tourism Management, 2007. DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2005.12.025. 
[11] CHEN P. Effects of the entropy weight on TOPSIS[J/OL]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 168: 114186. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114186. 
[12] TADDEO S, AGNESE P, BUSATO F. Rethinking the effect of ESG practices on profitability through cross-dimensional substitutability[J/OL]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 352: 120115. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120115. 
[13] SAHA R, MAJI S G. Does environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure matter for carbon intensity? Evidence from S&P 500 firms[J/OL]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 387: 125809. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125809. 
[14] POTTER E, JOHANSON K, MOLAN D. Activating rural infrastructures in regional communities: Cultural funding, silo art works and the challenge of local benefit[J/OL]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2024, 106: 103239. DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103239. 
[15] Qing, DOBBIE M. IMPORTANCE-SATISFACTION ANALYSIS OF CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL LANDSCAPES DESIGNED FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT[J/OL]. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 2019. DOI:10.15302/j-laf-20190105. 
[16] Chen, Yingzi, Hu, Yaqi, Lai, Lina. Demography-Oriented Urban Spatial Matching of Service Facilities: Case Study of Changchun, China[J/OL]. Land, 2022. DOI:10.3390/land11101660.

Downloads: 29716
Visits: 1041579

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.