Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

A Threshold–Compensation Hypothesis for Driver Over-the-Top: Subtyping, Screening, and a Research Agenda

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jhms.2026.070106 | Downloads: 0 | Views: 49

Author(s)

Chen Liyuan 1

Affiliation(s)

1 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

Corresponding Author

Chen Liyuan

ABSTRACT

Over-the-Top (OTT) in the driver swing is conventionally treated as a club-head path error, yet a specific subgroup—relatively stable with irons or at reduced speed but with recurrent OTT at full driver speed—resists path correction. This article presents a falsifiable theoretical hypothesis and research agenda. It proposes that, within this subtype, OTT may not originate as a proximal path error but may instead represent the downstream geometric projection of a sequencing reorganization occurring when, under high task demand, the lead-leg braking threshold and/or the scapular stability threshold is approached or crossed. Defining the bandwidth for stable, non-compensatory sequencing as the lower of the two thresholds (B = min), we distinguish four threshold combinations, derive parametric predictions, and set a subtype-first, then-screen, then-verify-transfer pathway. Framed within a constraints-led perspective—the threshold an organismic constraint, full-speed or distance-pursuit driving a task constraint—OTT emerges from their interaction, offering a testable account of its speed and club specificity. We juxtapose competing explanations (address error, top-of-backswing structure, release timing, an internal shift of attentional focus, and a common upstream driver) and design three pre-registration-oriented studies testing the timing of compensation versus path deviation, the transfer of targeted training, and the predictive validity of subtyping. We do not claim to have proven a single cause; we offer a hypothesis testable by subsequent biomechanical and training-intervention research.

KEYWORDS

Golf; Over-the-Top; Kinematic sequence; Scapular stability; Compensation threshold; Lead-leg braking; Constraints-led approach

CITE THIS PAPER

Chen Liyuan. A Threshold–Compensation Hypothesis for Driver Over-the-Top: Subtyping, Screening, and a Research Agenda. Journal of Human Movement Science (2026) Vol. 7, No. 1, 36-45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jhms.2026.070106.

REFERENCES

[1] Cheetham PJ, Rose GA, Hinrichs RN, et al. Comparison of kinematic sequence parameters between amateur and professional golfers. In: Crews D, Lutz R, eds. Science and Golf V. Mesa: Energy in Motion; 2008:30-36.
[2] Chu Y, Sell TC, Lephart SM. The relationship between biomechanical variables and driving performance during the golf swing. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(11):1251-1259.
[3] Putnam CA. Sequential motions of body segments in striking and throwing skills: descriptions and explanations. J Biomech. 1993;26(Suppl 1):125-135.
[4] Kim SE, Lee J, Lee SY, et al. Small changes in ball position at address cause a chain effect in golf swing. Sci Rep. 2021;11:2694.
[5] Ball KA, Best RJ. Different centre of pressure patterns within the golf stroke I: cluster analysis. J Sports Sci. 2007;25(7):757-770.
[6] Kao JT, Pink M, Jobe FW, et al. Electromyographic analysis of the scapular muscles during a golf swing. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(1):19-23.
[7] Cools AM, Struyf F, De Mey K, et al. Rehabilitation of scapular dyskinesis: from the office worker to the elite overhead athlete. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(8):692-697.
[8] Kibler WB. The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(2):325-337.
[9] McHugh MP, O’Mahoney CA, Orishimo KF, et al. Kinematic, kinetic, and temporal metrics associated with golf proficiency. J Strength Cond Res. 2024;38(3):599-606.
[10] Kwon YH, Han KH, Como C, et al. Validity of the X-factor computation methods and relationship between the X-factor parameters and clubhead velocity in skilled golfers. Sports Biomech. 2013;12(3):231-246.
[11] Watson A, Evans K, Haynes P, et al. Ground reaction force and centre of pressure during the golf swing and associations with clubhead speed and skill level: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2026. (advance online publication; DOI and final bibliographic details to be verified before submission)
[12] Bradshaw EJ, Keogh JWL, Hume PA, et al. The effect of biological movement variability on the performance of the golf swing in high- and low-handicapped players. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009;80(2):185-196.
[13] Ball KA, Best RJ. Different centre of pressure patterns within the golf stroke II: group-based analysis. J Sports Sci. 2007;25(7):771-779.
[14] Newell KM. Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade MG, Whiting HTA, eds. Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff; 1986:341-360.
[15] Langdown BL, Bridge MW, Li FX. The influence of an 8-week strength and corrective exercise intervention on the overhead deep squat and golf swing kinematics. J Strength Cond Res. 2023;37(2):291-297.
[16] Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
[17] Karduna AR, McClure PW, Michener LA, et al. Dynamic measurements of three-dimensional scapular kinematics: a validation study. J Biomech Eng. 2001;123(2):184-190.
[18] Horan SA, Evans K, Morris NR, et al. Thorax and pelvis kinematics during the downswing of male and female skilled golfers. J Biomech. 2010;43(8):1456-1462.
[19] Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 15 years. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013;6(1):77-104.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.