Remote Video Testimony by Victims in Sexual Assault Cases Involving Minors
DOI: 10.23977/law.2026.050214 | Downloads: 0 | Views: 21
Author(s)
Guoqing Xie 1
Affiliation(s)
1 Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Corresponding Author
Guoqing XieABSTRACT
Crimes of sexual assault against minors are typically committed in concealed places by acquaintances, making the victim's statement the key evidence for conviction. When minor victims testify in court, they face the risk of secondary psychological trauma and privacy disclosure. Remote video testimony, which separates the victim from the courtroom through technical means, offers a viable way to balance procedural justice with the special protection of minor victims, yet it raises concerns over the principle of direct and oral trial, the right of confrontation, and technical security. This paper demonstrates the necessity and feasibility of remote video testimony, analyzes its practical difficulties, and proposes paths to improvement in terms of coordinating the principle of direct and oral trial, improving the mechanism of assistance and supervision, refining procedural rules, and strengthening technical safeguards, so as to protect the rights and interests of minor victims while upholding procedural justice.
KEYWORDS
Sexual assault cases involving minors; Remote video testimony; Minor victims; Right of confrontationCITE THIS PAPER
Guoqing Xie. Remote Video Testimony by Victims in Sexual Assault Cases Involving Minors. Science of Law Journal (2026). Vol. 5, No. 2, 97-107. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2026.050214.
REFERENCES
[1] Supreme People's Procuratorate. White Paper on Procuratorial Work Concerning Minors (2024). Beijing: Supreme People's Procuratorate; 2025.
[2] Supreme People's Court, Supreme People's Procuratorate, Ministry of Public Security, Ministry of Justice. Opinions on Lawfully Punishing Crimes of Sexual Assault against Minors. 2013.
[3] Supreme People's Court. Interpretation on the Application of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China. 2021.
[4] Supreme People's Court. Rules on Online Litigation of People's Courts. 2021.
[5] Ceci SJ, Bruck M. Jeopardy in the courtroom: a scientific analysis of children's testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1995.
[6] Supreme People's Procuratorate. Guidelines for Procuratorial Work Concerning Minors (for Trial Implementation). 2017.
[7] Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Minors. 2020.
[8] Guangzhou court launches "face-scan" WeChat video testimony. Available from: https://www.chinanews.com.cn/sh/2017/10-17/8354880.shtml [Accessed 30th August 2026].
[9] Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China. 2018.
[10] Zhu Xiao. Cracking the dilemma of applying the principle of direct and oral trial. Journal of Shanxi Provincial Institute of Political and Legal Management Cadres. 2021; (3): 109-112.
[11] Yin Lingran. Conflict and balance: the protection of minor victims in testifying and the exercise of the defendant's right of confrontation. Global Law Review. 2022; (4): 50-65.
| Downloads: | 19254 |
|---|---|
| Visits: | 942936 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting

Download as PDF