Author(s)

Sun Haonan ¹, Chen Gaoyang ¹, Su Yutong ¹, Hu Wenbo ¹, Wang Weidong ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ College of Humanities and Foreign Languages, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China

Corresponding Author

Sun Haonan

ABSTRACT

In recent years, financial technology (FinTech) enterprises have thrived in China. However, the flourishing FinTech field is accompanied by the lagging of financial supervision. Regardless of innovations, FinTech is in essence related to the finance and therefore still needs to be correctly guided and supervised, so as to balance risks while guaranteeing efficiency, thus maintaining financial stability. From the perspective of governmental supervision, the research analyzes the status quo of governmental supervision over FinTech enterprises from four aspects, i.e. supervising subjects, supervision contents, supervisory measures, and supervision effects. Meanwhile, existing main problems in governmental supervision are summarized, based on which targeted countermeasures and suggestions are proposed for how to improve the supervision system of FinTech enterprises.

KEYWORDS

Governmental supervision, financial technology, regulatory system

CITE THIS PAPER

Sun Haonan, Chen Gaoyang, Su Yutong, Hu Wenbo, Wang Weidong, Building of a standard system for supervision over financial technology enterprises from the perspective of governmental regulation. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2022) Vol. 4: 101-106. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2022.040220.

REFERENCES

[1] Han Junjin. Implementation paths of sandbox supervision in China [D]. Hubei: Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2016: 4.
[2] Liu Wen. Research on the regulatory sandbox system under the background of financial technology [D]. Jiangxi: Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2021:2. 
[3] Kong Fanyao. Reflections on the supervision over FinTech enterprises—the case of Ant Financial Services Group [J]. Shanxi Finance and Tax, 2020(12): 35-38.
[4] Feng Suling, Zhao Shu, Wu Haoyue. The Impact of FinTech on Corporate Financial Risk and Its Internal Mechanism: On the Threshold Effect of Financial Regulation [J]. Reform, 2021(10): 84-100.
[5] Yuan Yang. Game analysis of coordinated development between innovative FinTech enterprises and financial regulators [D]. Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2021.
[6] Chen Sanmao, Qian Yan. Big Tech enterprises' financial footprint and the supervision problem [J]. Journal of Financial Development Research, 2021(05):83-89.DOI:10.19647/j.cnki.37-1462/f.2021.05.012.
[7] Qi Li. Research on construction of information disclosure system of testing enterprises in Fin-Tech "regulatory sandbox" [J]. Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2020,13(02):161-167.
[8] Li Longtao. Research on risk management mechanism of Internet finance: control activities, supervision and information exchange [N]. Commercial Bank, 2016.
[9] Jiang Shangpu. Risk analysis of Internet finance and regulatory suggestions [N]. Financial Computerizing, 2019.
[10] Li Bing. FinTech regulation faces new challenges and more accurate authorization of data will be explored [N]. Security Daily, 2021-10-13(B01).

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
  
  
• Information and Knowledge Management
  
  
• Military and Armament Science
  
  
• Media and Communication Research
  
  
• Journal of Human Movement Science
  
  
• Art and Performance Letters
  
  
• Lecture Notes on History
  
  
• Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
  
  
• Philosophy Journal
  
  
• Science of Law Journal
  
  
• Journal of Political Science Research
  
  
• Advances in Broadcasting