Author(s)

Ling Gao ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China

Corresponding Author

Ling Gao

ABSTRACT

New energy vehicle, as a key emerging industry in China, are an important way to alleviate the energy crisis and take the road of green technology innovation. However, there are always some problems such as inadequate research and development of core technology, waste of resources, and low conversion rate of achievements. Taking the new energy automobile listed company as the research object, a two-stage SBM-DEA model is constructed to measure the efficiency of green technology innovation in China from the two stages of technology research and development and achievement transformation. Combined with the difference of innovation efficiency in different stages, the failure phenomena of green technology innovation process are analyzed. Finally, the innovation failure avoidance measures are put forward according to the development status of new energy vehicles.

KEYWORDS

New energy vehicle enterprises, green technology innovation, two-stage SBM-DEA, failure

CITE THIS PAPER

Ling Gao, Research on the Failure Avoidance of Green Technology Innovation of New Energy Vehicle Enterprises. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management (2019) 2: 24-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ieim.2019.21004.

REFERENCES

[1] Dangelico R M . What Drives Green Product Development and How do Different Antecedents Affect Market Performance? A Survey of Italian Companies with Eco‐Labels [J]. Business Strategy & the Environment, 2017, 26 (8).
[2] Yusuf M F, Ashari H, Razalli M R. Environmental Technological Innovation and Its Contribution to Sustainable Development [J]. Civil Engineering, 2018, 9 (8).
[3] Gassmann O , Zeschky M . Opening up the Solution Space: The Role of Analogical Thinking for Breakthrough Product Innovation [J]. Creativity & Innovation Management, 2010, 17 (2): 97-106.
[4] Hernandez-Espallardo M, Molina-Castillo F J, Rodriguez-Orejuela A. Learning processes, their impact on innovation performance and the moderating role of radicalness [J]. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2012, 15 (1): 77-98.
[5] Jenson I , Leith P , Doyle R , et al. Testing innovation systems theory using Qualitative Comparative Analysis [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69 (4): 1283-1287.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Information Systems and Economics
  
  
• Accounting, Auditing and Finance
  
  
• Tourism Management and Technology Economy
  
  
• Journal of Computational and Financial Econometrics
  
  
• Financial Engineering and Risk Management
  
  
• Accounting and Corporate Management
  
  
• Social Security and Administration Management
  
  
• Population, Resources & Environmental Economics
  
  
• Statistics & Quantitative Economics
  
  
• Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management
  
  
• Social Medicine and Health Management
  
  
• Land Resource Management
  
  
• Information, Library and Archival Science
  
  
• Journal of Human Resource Development
  
  
• Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
  
  
• Operational Research and Cybernetics