Research on the Application Effect of Four-Track Teaching Method in the Hospital Internship of Biomedical Engineering Based on Bonfferoni and LSD Test Analysis
DOI: 10.23977/phpm.2022.020307 | Downloads: 10 | Views: 561
Author(s)
Qianyu Zhang 1, Qinfeng Liu 2, Hui Liu 2, Shuanglin Wei 2, Tao Wang 3
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Life Science and Technology, Xi 'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710049, China
2 Medical Equipment Management Department, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710068, China
3 Department of Medical Imaging, Hospital of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China
Corresponding Author
Qinfeng LiuABSTRACT
Objective To explore the application value of LBL-CBL-PBL-TBL four-track teaching method in the hospital intership of biomedical engineering. Methods The students majoring in biomedical engineering who had been interning in the hospital from March to June 2021 were divided into three groups: A, B and C. LBL-CBL, LBL-CBL-PBL and LBL-CBL-PBL-TBL teaching methods were adopted respectively. Before the end of the internship, the students' internship situation and teaching satisfaction were investigated and statistically analyzed, and the Bonfferoni and LSD tests were used for multiple comparative analysis between groups. Results In the comparison of basic theory test scores and total scores, groups B and C were higher than group A, group C had the highest score (F=24.648,F=35.518; P < 0.001), the scores of groups B and C were also higher than that of group A (F=19.317; P < 0.001),and there was no significant difference between the scores of group B and group C(P=0.101>0.05) ; in the statistics of students internship grading by the the internship guide teachers,the scores of the students' learning enthusiasm and innovative practice ability of groups B and C was better than that of group A, and group C had the best performance (F=84.312,F=65.324; P < 0.001),students in group C scored better than those in groups A and B (F=56.116; P < 0.001), and there was no significant difference between groups A and B in teamwork ability scores (P=0.410 > 0.05); in the statistics of student questionnaire survey grading, students in groups B and C were better than group A in teaching mode satisfaction, internship skills and medical engineering thinking, and group C had the best performance (F=76.318,F=45.589,F=145.473; P < 0.001). Conclusions LBL-CBL-PBL-TBL four-track teaching method can enhance students' learning enthusiasm, improve their comprehensive ability level and improve their mastery of practice skills in the process of internship of biomedical engineering, which has high application and promotion value.
KEYWORDS
Four-track teaching method, Internship, teaching mode, Medical engineering thinking, Practice skillsCITE THIS PAPER
Qianyu Zhang, Qinfeng Liu, Hui Liu, Shuanglin Wei, Tao Wang, Research on the Application Effect of Four-Track Teaching Method in the Hospital Internship of Biomedical Engineering Based on Bonfferoni and LSD Test Analysis. MEDS Public Health and Preventive Medicine (2022) Vol. 2: 40-47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/phpm.2022.020307.
REFERENCES
[1] Zilbovicius Mauro, Piqueira JosÉ Roberto C, Sznelvar Laerte, Complexity engineering: New ideas for engineering design and engineering education. [J]. An Acad Bras Cienc, 2020, 92: e20191489.
[2] White John A, Gaver Donald P, Butera Robert J et al. Core Competencies for Undergraduates in Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering: Findings, Consequences, and Recommendations. [J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2020, 48: 905-912.
[3] Krishnan Shankar, Collaboration for cooperative work experience programs in biomedical engineering education. [J]. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2010, 2010: 2955-8.
[4] Carrasco Gonzalo A, Behling Kathryn C, Lopez Osvaldo, Weekly team-based learning scores and participation are better predictors of successful course performance than case-based learning performance: role of assessment incentive structure. [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2021, 21: 521.
[5] Solomon Yonatan, Comparison Between Problem-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning: Effect on Nursing Students' Immediate Knowledge Retention. [J]. Adv Med Educ Pract, 2020, 11: 947-952.
[6] Ma Chunhua, Zhou Wei, Effects of unfolding case-based learning on academic achievement, critical thinking, and self-confidence in undergraduate nursing students learning health assessment skills. [J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2022, 60: 103321.
[7] Tadesse Selamawit Girma, Tadesse Dereje Girma, Dagnaw Eyaya Habtie, Problem based learning approach increases the academic satisfaction of health science students in Ethiopian universities: a comparative cross-sectional study. [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2022, 22: 334.
[8] Roh Young Sook, Kim Sang Suk, Park Sunah et al. Effects of a Simulation with Team-Based Learning on Knowledge, Team Performance, and Teamwork for Nursing Students. [J]. Comput Inform Nurs, 2020, 38: 367-372.
[9] Schmidt Henk G, Rotgans Jerome I, Rajalingam Preman et al. A Psychological Foundation for Team-Based Learning: Knowledge Reconsolidation. [J]. Acad Med, 2019, 94: 1878-1883.
[10] Zilbovicius Mauro, Piqueira JosÉ Roberto C, Sznelvar Laerte, Complexity engineering: New ideas for engineering design and engineering education. [J]. An Acad Bras Cienc, 2020, 92: e20191489.
[11] Ye Huajie, Li Cuifeng, Engineering Education Understanding Expert Decision System Research and Application. [J]. Comput Intell Neurosci, 2022, 2022: 9662301.
[12] Fogg-Rogers Laura, Moss Tim, validating a scale to measure engineers' perceived self-efficacy for engineering education outreach. [J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14: e0223728.
[13] Pecchia L, Pallikarakis N, Magjarevic R et al. Health Technology Assessment and Biomedical Engineering: Global trends, gaps and opportunities. [J]. Med Eng Phys, 2019, 72: 19-26.
[14] Magjarevic Ratko, Zequera Diaz Martha L, Biomedical engineering education--status and perspectives. [J]. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2014, 2014: 5149-52.
[15] Ilgüy Mehmet, Ilgüy Dilhan, Fişekçioğlu Erdoğan et al. Comparison of case-based and lecture-based learning in dental education using the SOLO taxonomy. [J]. J Dent Educ, 2014, 78: 1521-7.
[16] Burgess Annette, Roberts Chris, Ayton Tom et al. Implementation of modified team-based learning within a problem-based learning medical curriculum: a focus group study. [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2018, 18: 74.
[17] Singh Nikhilesh, Gupta Richa, Mahalakshmi V N, Multistation exercises: a combination of problem-based learning and team-based learning instructional design for large-enrollment classes. [J]. Adv Physiol Educ, 2018, 42: 424-428.
[18] Dolmans Diana, Michaelsen Larry, van Merriënboer Jeroen et al. Should we choose between problem-based learning and team-based learning? No, combine the best of both worlds! [J]. Med Teach, 2015, 37: 354-9.
Downloads: | 1714 |
---|---|
Visits: | 79718 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
MEDS Clinical Medicine
-
Journal of Neurobiology and Genetics
-
Medical Imaging and Nuclear Medicine
-
Bacterial Genetics and Ecology
-
Transactions on Cancer
-
Journal of Biophysics and Ecology
-
Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary
-
Academic Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
-
Transactions on Cell and Developmental Biology
-
Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology
-
Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
-
Hematology and Stem Cell
-
Journal of Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Engineering
-
MEDS Basic Medicine
-
MEDS Stomatology
-
MEDS Chinese Medicine
-
Journal of Enzyme Engineering
-
Advances in Industrial Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
-
Bacteriology and Microbiology
-
Advances in Physiology and Pathophysiology
-
Journal of Vision and Ophthalmology
-
Frontiers of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
Digestive Disease and Diabetes
-
Advances in Immunology and Vaccines
-
Nanomedicine and Drug Delivery
-
Cardiology and Vascular System
-
Pediatrics and Child Health
-
Journal of Reproductive Medicine and Contraception
-
Journal of Respiratory and Lung Disease
-
Journal of Bioinformatics and Biomedicine