Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Research on the Policy Changes of China's Private Education Based on the Advocacy Coalition Framework

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jsoce.2022.040611 | Downloads: 41 | Views: 1632

Author(s)

Huanhuan Luo 1, Wenhao Yao 1, Min Zhao 1

Affiliation(s)

1 South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

Corresponding Author

Huanhuan Luo

ABSTRACT

As an important part of education, the formulation and revision of private education policies have attracted much attention. Based on Advocacy Coalition Framework, this research attempts to study the changing process of China's private education policy. According to the period of major private education policy promulgation and value orientation, the evolution of China's private education can be divided into four stages. It is significant to verify whether the ACF has applicability to China's public policy practice and then explore the applicability and effectiveness of the ACF in the process of Chinese private education change. Finally, based on the analysis, this passage provide several proposals for the china's private education and expect to enrich the theory of the ACF with the case of policy change with Chinese characteristics.

KEYWORDS

Private education; Advocacy Coalition Framework; Policy process

CITE THIS PAPER

Huanhuan Luo, Wenhao Yao, Min Zhao, Research on the Policy Changes of China's Private Education Based on the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology (2022) Vol. 4: 71-78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2022.040611.

REFERENCES

[1] Sabatier Paul, and Christopher Weible. The Advocacy Coalition Framework:Innovations and Clarifica-tions in Sabatier Paul. Theories of the Policy Process. Second Edition. Boulder: Westview Press, 2007.201 -203.
[2] Bryan Jones. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1994.
[3] Carter Wilson. Public Policy: Continuity and Change. New York: McGraw-Hill Company.2006.
[4] Daniel Lerner, Harold D.Lasswell. The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1951.
[5] Michael Mintrom, Sandra Vergari. "Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change" Policy Studies Journal, 1996. 24: 420-434. 
[6] M.  Lubell.  "Collaborative institutions, belief systems, and perceived policy effectiveness," Political Research Quarterly, 2003. 56 (3): 309–323. 
[7] Paul A.  Sabatier.  "The Advocacy Coalition Framework:  Revisions and Relevance for Europe," Journal of European Public Policy, 1998. 5: 98-130. 
[8] Paul A. Sabatier, Matthew Zafonte. "Policy Oriented Learning Between Coalitions: Characteristics of Successful Professional/ Scientific Fora," Paper presented at the AAAS meetings, Seattle, February. 1997. 
[9] Elliott, Chris, and Rodolphe Schlaepfer. 2001. "The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Application to the Policy Process for the Development of Forest Certification in Sweden." Journal of European Public Policy 8 (4): 642–61
[10] Richard Pring, 1987, Privatization in education. Journal of Education Policy, 2:4, 289-299. 
[11] Wang Feng, 2019, Key Factors Influencing the Results of the Implementation of the "New Policies" on Private Education. Chinese Education & Society, 52:1-2, 3-10.
[12] Weible Christopher. An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy. Journal of Public Administration Re-search and Theory, 2006,17(1).
[13] Yan Fengqiao, 2019, Why Have Policies on Private Education Been Slow to Make Progress? Observations from the Perspective of Organizational Behavior and Decision Making. Chinese Education & Society, 52:1-2, 35-48.
[14] Colin Bangay. Corresponding author, 2005, Private education: relevant or redundant? Private education, decentralisation and national provision in Indonesia, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 35:2, 167-179.
[15] Samuel Tsang, 2019, Evaluating European education policy-making: privatization, networks and the European Commission. Journal of Education Policy, 34:1, 153-154.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.