Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Research Review of Platform Enterprise Evolution from an Ecological Perspective Based on Citespace

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/infkm.2022.030103 | Downloads: 14 | Views: 911

Author(s)

Chenyang Wang 1, Wenping Luo 1, Gedong Jiang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, 201306, China

Corresponding Author

Chenyang Wang

ABSTRACT

With the rapid development of Internet and new technology, "platformization" has become a new trend of enterprise organization. The rise of Google, Amazon, Alibaba, JD and other platforms has different characteristics, development speed and scale from traditional enterprises, and their development and evolution path has attracted academic attention. Combined with Citespace and content analysis method, this paper measured and described the references on the evolution of platform enterprises from 1999 to 2021 in WOS database and made a conclusion: (1) Economics and business are two hot research perspectives. (2) Case analysis and simulation analysis are hot research methods. (3) "Common enterprises in the initial stage—platform enterprises in the growth stage—platform ecology in the mature stage" are the stages of hot spot evolution. Finally, the existing references are integrated and reviewed comprehensively, and the framework model is proposed to clarify the current research status, provide ideas for future research, and put forward prospects for the shortcomings of research.

KEYWORDS

Platform Enterprise, Platform Evolution, Ecosystem, Research Review

CITE THIS PAPER

Chenyang Wang, Wenping Luo, Gedong Jiang, Research Review of Platform Enterprise Evolution from an Ecological Perspective Based on Citespace. Information and Knowledge Management (2022) Vol. 3: 22-30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/infkm.2022.030103.

REFERENCES

[1] Gagnon J, Goyal S. Networks, Markets and Inequality, American Economic Review, 2017, 107(1):1-30.
[2] Mcintyre D P, Srinivasan A. Networks, Platforms and Strategy: Emerging Views and next Steps. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, 38(1):141-160.
[3] Figueiredo Facin, Ana Lucia, de Vasconcelos Gomes, Leonardo Augusto, Spinola, Mauro de Mesquita. The Evolution of the Platform Concept: A Systematic Review. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2016,63(4):475-488.
[4] Meyer M H, Utterback M. The Product Family and the Dynamics of Core Capability. MIT Sloan Management Review, 1992, 34: 29-47.
[5] Li Yunyao, Liu Haibo, Huang Shaojian. Research Trends of platform economy Theory. Economic Trends, 2013(07):123-129.
[6] Figueiredo Facin, Ana Lucia, de Vasconcelos Gomes, Leonardo Augusto, Spinola, Mauro de Mesquita. The Evolution of the Platform Concept: A Systematic Review.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2016,63(4): 475-488.
[7] Moore J F. Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 1993,71(3):75-86.
[8] Moore J F. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the age of Business Ecosystems[M]. New York: Harper Paperbacks, 1996:2-20.
[9] Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, et al. Co-creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: the Case of Enterprise Software. MIS Quarterly, 2012, 36(1): 263-290.
[10] Wareham J, Fox P B, Cano Giner J L. Technology Ecosystem Governance. Organization Science, 2014, 25(4):1195-1215.
[11] Cennamo C, Santalo J. Platform Competition: Strategic Trade-offs in the Platform Markets. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(11):1331-1350.
[12] M Peltoniemi, E Vuori. Business Ecosystem as the New Approach to Complex Adaptive Business Environments. Proceedings of eBusiness Research Forum, 2004.
[13] Zhang Yi, Zhu Guilong, Chen Kaihua. International research on industry-University-research cooperation: Research status and Knowledge. Science of Science and science and technology management, 2015,36(09):62-70.
[14] Chen Yue, Chen Chaomei, Liu Zeyuan, Hu Zhigang, Wang Xianwen. The methodological function of Citespace Knowledge graph. Studies in science of science, 2015,33(02):242-253.
[15] Boudreau, Kevin. Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control. Management Science, 2010, 56(10):1849-1872.
[16] Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M. Platform Envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 2011, 32(1):1270-1285.
[17] Tiwana A, Konysnski B, Bush A A. Platform Evolution: Co-evolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics. Information System Research, 2010,21(4):675-687.
[18] Zhu, Feng; Iansiti, Marco. Entry into Platform‐Based Markets. trategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(1):88-106.
[19] Gawer, Annabelle; Cusumano, Michael A. Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(3):417-433.
[20] Gawer, Annabelle. Bridging Differing Perspectives on Technological Platforms: Toward an Integrative Framework. Research Policy, 2014, 43(7):1239-1249.
[21] Thomas, Llewellyn D. W.; Autio, Erkko; Gann, David M. Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2014, 28(2):198-219.
[22] Wareham, Jonathan; Fox, Paul B.; Cano Giner, Josep Lluis. Technology Ecosystem Governance. Organization Science, 2014, 25(4):1195-1215.
[23] Mcintyre, David P.; Srinivasan, Arati. Networks, Platforms and Strategy: Emerging Views and Next Steps. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, 38(1): 141-160.
[24] De Reuver, Mark; Sorensen, Carsten; Basole, Rahul C. The Digital Platform: A Research Agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 2018, 33(2):124-135.
[25] Jacobides, Michael G.; Cennamo, Carmelo; Gawer, Annabelle. Towards a Theory of Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(8):2255-2276.
[26] Adner, Ron. Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 2017, 43(1): 39-58.
[27] Baldwin C Y, Von Hippel E. Modeling a paradigm shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation. Organization Science, 2011, 22(6): 1399-1417.
[28] Reisinger M, Ressner L, Schmidtke R. Two-sided Markets with Pecuniary and Participation Externalities. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2009, 57(1):32-57.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.