Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Intra-platform disputes and democratic adjudication

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2022.010208 | Downloads: 4 | Views: 554

Author(s)

Peng Xue 1,2, Rongdong Zhang 1,2

Affiliation(s)

1 Institute of Public Policy and Management, Lyceum of the Philippines University, Manila, The Philippines
2 Department of Business Administration, Hefei Zhonghe Postdoctoral Think Tank Science Research Institute Co., Ltd, Hefei, China

Corresponding Author

Rongdong Zhang

ABSTRACT

History has selected and determined the position of the court in reconciling the conflict of rights, but this judicial mechanism is not omnipotent, and the cost of litigation and the complicated procedure have become the first threshold. These preconditions make people with the desire for rights subject to rational guidance to decide whether to continue to maintain rights, especially when the object of dispute is relatively small. Some e-commerce platforms have developed a mechanism to deal with internal disputes through mutual review among users. Whether this can become an ideal means to supplement traditional justice is a topic that needs to be discussed under the Internet economy.

KEYWORDS

Internal disputes, judicial mechanism, Internet economy

CITE THIS PAPER

Peng Xue, Rongdong Zhang, Intra-platform disputes and democratic adjudication. Science of Law Journal (2022) Vol. 1: 58-62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2022.010208.

REFERENCES

[1] Han Xuanyao. Application and Perfection of the Non-judicial ODR in Our Country -- Taking Idle Fish Small Court as an example [J]. Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 35 (05):118. 
[2] Sun Ying, Bu Hongyu. Research on Internal Consumption Dispute Settlement Mechanism (ODR) of E-commerce Platform [J]. China Market Regulation Research, 2020(03):20.
[3] Gao Wei. Institutional analysis of two approaches to Internet dispute resolution and their social embedment issues. Chinese and Foreign Law, 2014, 26(04):1069. 
[4] Wang Fuhua. Small Litigation and Welfare System [J]. Chinese and Foreign Law, 2016, 28(01):123
[5] Bai Changqian. Practical Difficulties and Solutions in the application of Small amount Litigation Procedure -- A Case Study of Chongqing Court [J]. Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law, 2015, 17(01):122.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.