The Application and Path Optimization of the Reform of the Integration of Political and Legal Systems: Analysis of Intelligent Technology Based on Judicial Big Data
DOI: 10.23977/law.2022.010302 | Downloads: 11 | Views: 233
Author(s)
Mengli Dong 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Civil, Commercial and Economic Law, Gansu University of Political Science and Law, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
Corresponding Author
Mengli DongABSTRACT
We are in an era of “the gathering of giants, the involvement of capital, and the continuous improvement of people’s legal awareness”. The goal of the reform in the field of politics and law requires that “the political and legal system should make new breakthroughs in the reform from a higher starting point”, which is also an important guideline for deepening the reform in the field of politics and law. Reform is the fundamental way to solve the problems in the political and legal work and a key to promoting the long-term development of the political and legal cause. At present, the smart and intelligent construction of political and legal institutions has achieved initial results, but they are all developed independently without systematic planning considerations. On the basis of cross department case handling business, we will initially build a smart political and legal system that integrates smart courts, smart prosecutors, smart policing, smart judicial services and promote the deepening of smart political and legal construction, so as to achieve the situation of connecting processes, gathering data, active supervision and smart applications. Based on this, the application of intelligent technology in the reform of the integration of political and legal systems and its path optimization are extremely important.
KEYWORDS
Politics and law, intelligent technology, reform, unificationCITE THIS PAPER
Mengli Dong, The Application and Path Optimization of the Reform of the Integration of Political and Legal Systems: Analysis of Intelligent Technology Based on Judicial Big Data. Science of Law Journal (2022) Vol. 1: 6-13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2022.010302.
REFERENCES
[1] Donglin Hu. (2016) Building Five Systems to Promote the Construction of Smart Procuratorate, People's Procuratorial Semimonthly, 6, 59-63.
[2] Ying Zhou, Jinwu Zhuo, Yueqing Bian. (2016) Big Data Mining: System Methods and Case Analysis, China Machine Press, 7.
[3] Maorong Huang. (2016) How Big Data Looks at Theory, Cause and Effect and Law - Discussion with Dr. Leilei Qi, Theoretical Exploration, 12.
[4] Frank Cross. (2011) Judgment of the United States Federal Court of Appeal, trans. Fei Cao, Beijing: Peking University Press, 4-45.
[5] Weiping Zhang. (2015) On the Legalization of Court Trial Records", Chinese and Foreign Law Journal, 4, 903-918.
[6] Frank. (2007) Court of First Instance: Myth and Reality in American Justice, trans. Chengshou Zhao, Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 8.
[7] Qiaoqiao Xin. (2021) Questioning the Power of Algorithm Interpretation, Qiushi Journal, 3.
[8] Pedro Domingos. (2017) How the ultimate algorithm machine learning and artificial intelligence reshape the world, trans. Fangping Huang, Beijing: CITIC Publishing Group, 66.
[9] Jean Francois Leotal. (1997) The Postmodern State: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Jinshan Che, Life Reading Xinzhi Sanlian Bookstore, 17.
[10] Weimin Zuo. (2018) Some Thoughts on the Application Prospect of Legal Artificial Intelligence in China. Tsinghua Law, 2, 108-124.
Downloads: | 943 |
---|---|
Visits: | 28005 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting