Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Application of Non-Custodial in Pretrial Detention Procedure

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.020105 | Downloads: 5 | Views: 270


Yuanyuan Zhang 1, Jiong Zhang 2


1 Law School, China Jiliang University, Xueyuan Street, Qiantang Town, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang, China
2 Beijing Institute of Remote Sensing Equipment, Yongding Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China

Corresponding Author

Yuanyuan Zhang


At present, China's pretrial detention rate is high. Through studying the actual operation of the non-custodial digital supervision system, in order to avoid problems such as limited supervision scope, invasion of privacy, monitoring time vacuum and legal liability gaps, the study believes that it is necessary to expand the scope of application, clarify the principle of application proportion, build a dynamic multi-level supervision system, improve the responsibility and relief channels and other measures to meet the requirements of improving alternative custody and the value orientation of reducing the rate of pretrial detention.


Digital reform, digital risk, dynamic control, pre-trial detention, digital monitoring


Yuanyuan Zhang, Jiong Zhang, The Application of Non-Custodial in Pretrial Detention Procedure. Science of Law Journal (2023) Vol. 2: 32-40. DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.020105.


[1] Chen Ruihua, Legal control of pretrial detention: an analysis from the perspective of comparative law. 4 political and Law Forum, 100(2001), p, 5.
[2] Guo Shuo, wandering and moving forward: an analysis of the high detention rate under the background of the new criminal procedure law, 4 jurists, (2014), p, 85-86.
[3] Xie Tian, Li Yang, The practice and exploration of digital surveillance of non-custodial people in criminal proceedings: From the perspective of the use of non-custodial codes in Xihu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 2021 Chinese procurator No. 7, p.35.
[4] Lin Lihong, Deng Ganghong, Investigation report on the rights of detainees in pretrial detention. Chinese Journal of Criminal Law, 8(2009), p. 112.
[5] Zhang Guodong, Research on the limits of artificial intelligence in Criminal Justice, Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology Science (social science), 4(2020),p.64.
[6] Xie Tian, Li Yang, the practice and exploration of digital surveillance of non-detainees in criminal proceedings: the use of code as a visual angle, Chinese procurator, 7th 2021, p. 35.
[7] Li Ben. Artificial Intelligence in American judicial practice: problems and challenges. 2 China Law Review, 55(2018), p, 6.
[8] Bian Jianlin, on the perfection of our country's pretrial detention system, 3 jurists, (2012), p, 84.
[9] Gao Yifei, Liu Bonan, electronic monitoring in restrictive coercive measures, Journal of Nantong University, Social Science Edition, 2014 Volume 30, Issue 1, p, 50.
[10] Anita Gibbs, Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring, Criminology and Criminal Justice, (2003), p.4.
[11] Chen Jinghui, Defending the precautionary principle: a legal stance on scientific and technological risks, Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law, vol. 21, (2018), p. 69-70.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.