Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Analysis on how globalization has eroded the distinction between domestic and international politics

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/polsr.2023.040105 | Downloads: 10 | Views: 644

Author(s)

Yangyang Shao 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Institute of Continuing Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Corresponding Author

Yangyang Shao

ABSTRACT

This paper mainly discusses on how the process of globalization has caused challenging influences on the conventionally defined boundaries between domestic and international politics. First, the generally admitted distinctions between the national and the transnational will be outlined by referring to the concept of sovereign state and territoriality. The definition and key features of globalization will then be stated before turning to a specific discussion on global politics. Finally, the impacts that globalization has brought to orthodox political theory will be analyzed. It will be concluded that the conventional presupposition in political studies to define a clear division between the "domestic" and the "foreign", whether geographically or through institutional building, no longer accords with the trend of globalization. 

KEYWORDS

Globalization; political globalization; domestic politics; international politics

CITE THIS PAPER

Yangyang Shao, Analysis on how globalization has eroded the distinction between domestic and international politics. Journal of Political Science Research (2023) Vol. 4: 26-30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/polsr.2023.040105.

REFERENCES

[1] Weber Gerth, Mills Gerth, Hans Heinrich & Mills C. Wright. (2009). From Max Weber: essays in sociology. London: Routledge, pp77-128.
[2] Philpott Daniel, "Sovereignty", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Ed.), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/sovereignty/>.
[3] Scheuerman William, "Globalization", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), forthcoming URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/globalization/>.
[4] Mearsheimer John J., 2003, The Tragedy of Great Politics, New York: Norton, pp166-181.
[5] Rosenau J. N. (1997). Along the domestic-foreign frontier: Exploring governance in a turbulent world (No. 53). Cambridge University Press.
[6] Tomlinson J. (1999). Globalization and culture. University of Chicago Press.
[7] Cabrera Luis (ed.), 2011, Global Governance, Global Government: Institutional Visions for an Evolving World System, Albany: SUNY Press.
[8] Scheuerman William E., 2014, "Cosmopolitanism and the World State," Review of International Studies, 40: 419–41.
[9] Maus Ingeborg, 2006, "From Nation-State to Global State or the Decline of Democracy," Constellations, 13: 465–84.
[10] Keohane Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S. (2000) 'Globalization: What's New? What's Not? (And So What?)', Foreign Policy, 118: 104-19.
[11] Bull Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.
[12] Greider William. (1997) One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism (New York, Simon & Schuster).
[13] Dryzek John S. (1995) 'Political and Ecological Communication', Environ­ mental Politics, 4 / 4: 13-30.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.