Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Safety of Open Surgery and Total Endoscopic Anastomosis Assisted Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/medsc.2023.040310 | Downloads: 17 | Views: 678

Author(s)

Sakarie Mustafe Hidig 1, Haotian Li 1, Xiaocheng Zhu 2, Yong Shao 2

Affiliation(s)

1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221002, Jiangsu, China
2 Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221002, Jiangsu, China

Corresponding Author

Sakarie Mustafe Hidig

ABSTRACT

To study the safety of open surgery and total endoscopic anastomosis assisted radical resection of colorectal cancer. 100 patients with rectal cancer admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to May 2022 were selected as the subjects of this study. According to the operation method, the patients were randomly assigned into two groups, namely the control group and the observation group, with 50 cases each. The control group was treated with open rectal resection. After understanding the surgical treatment plan, the patients could be anesthetized, and lithotomy position was taken. The operation started from the middle of the abdomen, the mesentery was opened in the abdomen, the corresponding intestinal segment was isolated from the colonic artery, and the blood vessels on it were ligation with the surrounding lymph nodes. The intestinal tube was cut off at the position 5 cm away from the tumor, and then the small intestine was anastomosed, and then the distilled liquid was used to clean the bleeding carefully. After the hemostasis was completed, the drainage tube was inserted, and the wound was sutured. Observation group was treated with open surgery and total endoscopic anastomosis assisted radical resection of colorectal cancer. By comparing the operation conditions of the two groups, the intraoperative blood loss in the observation group is significantly lower than that in the control group, and the operation time and postoperative hospital stay are significantly lower than that in the control group. By analyzing the serum levels of IL-6, CRP and TNF-α in the two groups, the levels of IL-6, CRP and TNF-α were higher in both groups after surgery than before surgery. The levels of IL-6, CRP and TNF-α in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group. Through the analysis of serum motilin and gastrin levels in the two groups, the levels of motilin and gastrin in the two groups 3 days after surgery were lower than before surgery, and the levels of motilin and gastrin in the observation group were higher than those in the control group. Through observation, the number of postoperative incision infection cases in the control group was 4 cases, anastomotic bleeding cases were 3 cases, and intestinal obstruction cases were 5 cases. The concurrent probability was 24.00% (12/50). In the observation group, there were 2 cases of postoperative incision infection, 1 case of anastomotic hemorrhage and 1 case of intestinal obstruction, and the complication probability was 8.00% (4/50). The probability of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the analysis difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The therapeutic effect of open surgery and total endoscopic anastomosis assisted radical resection of colorectal cancer is significantly better than that of traditional open surgery, which is worthy of promotion in clinical treatment.

KEYWORDS

Open Surgery, Full Cavity Mirror, Rectal Cancer, Total Endoscopic Anastomosis

CITE THIS PAPER

Sakarie Mustafe Hidig, Haotian Li, Xiaocheng Zhu, Yong Shao, Safety of Open Surgery and Total Endoscopic Anastomosis Assisted Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer (CRC). MEDS Clinical Medicine (2023) Vol. 4: 78-85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/medsc.2023.040310.

REFERENCES

[1] Sun Jianghua, Li Donghui, Liu Shihao, Wang Zitao. Comparison of clinical effect of total endoscopic radical gastrectomy and total endoscopic assisted radical gastrectomy in digestive tract reconstruction. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2002, 21(05):497-501.
[2] Wang Dong, Chen Jian, Chen Bo, Luo Shuixiang. Comparison of short term efficacy, quality of life and long term survival of total endoscopic radical surgery and traditional open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Cancer Prevention and Treatment, 2002, 35(02):175-180.
[3] Zhang L. Comparison of clinical effects of total endoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer and open surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. Medical Equipment, 2002,35(02):42-43.
[4] Wang X S. Effects of total endoscopy and laparotomy on interleukin-6, C-reactive protein and postoperative complications of colorectal cancer. Jilin Medical Journal, 2002,43(01):101-103.
[5] Wang Bo, Yue Kai, Mu Yalin. Evaluation of surgical Apgar score and CR-POSSUM in laparoscopic surgery with ERAS in rectal cancer. Journal of Practical Cancer,202,37(09):1487-1490.
[6] Hong Fangjing, Han Ting, Zhuo Jialu, Li Wei, Guo Panpan. Application of phase Angle in nutritional evaluation and prognosis prediction of patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Journal of Tongji University (Medical Edition),2022,43(03):402-407.
[7] Luo Yang, He Chengxiang, Jing Ran, Yang Zhigang, Yu Minhao, Sheng Chunxiao, Qin Shaolan, Fang Hongsheng, Gong Tingyue, Xie Hui, Zhong Ming. Effect of high and low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery on anterior resection syndrome in laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer. Chinese journal of practical surgery, 2022, and (3): 320-325. The DOI: 10.19538 / j.carol carroll JPS issn1005-2208.2022.03.10.
[8] Liu Yingtao, Kang Dapeng, Chen Wenliang. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Laparoscopic surg, 2022, 27 (02): 103-110. The DOI: 10.13499 / j.carol carroll nki FQJWKZZ. 2022.02.103.
[9] Bai Fang. The research status and progress of the laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. China medical equipment information, 2022, 28 (02): 35 and 37. DOI: 10.15971 / j.carol carroll nki cmdi. 2022.02.014.
[10] Sylla P, Rattner D W, Delgado S, et al. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surgical endoscopy, 2010, 24: 1205-1210.
[11] Fernández-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Annals of surgery, 2015, 261(2): 221-227.
[12] Deng, S., Liu, K., Gu, J., Cao, Y., Mao, F., Xue, Y., & Cai, K. (2023). Endoscopic fully covered self-expandable metal stent and vacuum-assisted drainage to treat postoperative colorectal cancer anastomotic stenosis with fistula. Surgical Endoscopy, 1-9.
[13] Jagielski, M., Piątkowski, J., Jarczyk, G., & Jackowski, M. (2021). Transrectal endoscopic drainage with vacuum-assisted therapy in patients with anastomotic leaks following rectal cancer resection. Surgical Endoscopy, 1-9.
[14] Bach, S. P., Gilbert, A., Brock, K., Korsgen, S., Geh, I., Hill, J., & Hookway, M. (2021). Radical surgery versus organ preservation via short-course radiotherapy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early-stage rectal cancer (TREC): a randomised, open-label feasibility study. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 6(2), 92-105.
[15] Fukata, K., Akiyoshi, T., Numao, N., Komai, Y., Mukai, T., Hiyoshi, Y., & Fukunaga, Y. (2022). Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for synchronous primary rectal and prostate cancer: Initial case series. Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 15(3), 678-682.

Downloads: 4714
Visits: 205434

Sponsors, Associates, and Links


All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.