Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Application of the Principle of Effective Control in International Law: On the Question of Sovereignty over the Aksai Chin Region

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.020804 | Downloads: 7 | Views: 292

Author(s)

Siyu Jiao 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Wuhan University China Institute of Boundary and Ocean Studies (CIBOS), Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China

Corresponding Author

Siyu Jiao

ABSTRACT

In August 2019, India amended its domestic constitution to transfer the Aksai Chin Region, which is under China's jurisdiction, to the jurisdiction of India's new "Union Territory of Ladakh", seriously violating China's territorial sovereignty and security. Since ancient times, the Aksai Chin Region has been an inalienable part of China's territory, and it has always been under the jurisdiction of the Chinese Government; India has no legal authority to prove that the Aksai Chin Region belongs to the Indian side. According to the relevant provisions of territorial law, a State may acquire sovereignty over an area by exercising effective control over it. According to the Principle of effective control, China has maintained sovereignty over and de facto control of the Aksai Chin Region for hundreds of years. India, on the other hand, does not have sufficient evidence to show the activities of the Indian government in the area, nor can it prove that India's claim to sovereignty over the Aksai Chin Region is superior to that of the Chinese government. Therefore, China has a superior claim in the Aksai Chin Region and sovereignty over the Aksai Chin Region should be vested in China.

KEYWORDS

Principle of effective control, Sino-Indian border dispute, Union Territory of Ladakh, Aksai Chin Region

CITE THIS PAPER

Siyu Jiao, Application of the Principle of Effective Control in International Law: On the Question of Sovereignty over the Aksai Chin Region. Science of Law Journal (2023) Vol. 2: 22-29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.020804.

REFERENCES

[1] HT Correspondents, Parliament revokes Article 370, J-K bifurcation sealed, Hindustan Times, August 7 2019, https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/lok-sabha-revokes-article-370-j-k-bifurcation-sealed/story-jRQxBYxWe2RDRnOjQxENeJ.html.
[2] Yi Wang, "Wang Yi Stands on Kashmir Issue," January 16, 2022, https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/wjbzhd/t1688117. shtml.
[3] "Official Spokesperson's Response to a Queryon Comments Made by the Chinese Spokesperson on the Issue of Central Territory of Ladakh Today," https://www.mea.gov.in/reponse-to-queries.htm? dtl/31720/Official_Spokesperson_ response_to_a_query_on_comments_made_ by_the_Chinese_Spokesperson_on_the_issue_of_JampK_today, visited on 16 Jan. 2022.
[4] "India, Chinese Soldiers Face-off Near Pangong Lake in Eastern Ladakh, Tensions Ease after Talks", https:www. indiatoday.in/india/story/india-china-army-ladakh-face-off-confrontation-1598214-2019-09-12, accessed on 16 Jan. 2022.
[5] Reporter of People's Daily, People's Daily to India: Borderline is bottom line, People's Daily online, July 11 2017, http://en.people.cn/n3/2017/0711/c90000-9240280.html.
[6] Sovereignty and Maritime Delimitation in the Red Sea (Eritrea v. Yemen), Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the First Stage - Territorial Sovereignty and Scope of the Dispute, Reports of International Arbitration Awards 1998, Vol. XXII, p. 258.
[7] Wang Junmin, "Key Dates in International Law," Politics and Law Forum, No. 4, late 2012, p. 163.
[8] Territorial and Maritime Dispute in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras), Judgement, I.C.J. Reports 2007, pp. 697-698.
[9] See "Memorandum from the Ministry of External Affairs of India to the Chinese Embassy in India (October 18, 1958)", in Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China: Compilation of Documents on Sino-Indian Boundary Issues and Other Issues concerning the Relations between the Two Countries in Tibet, China and India (August 1950-April 1960), p. 293; see also "Memorandum from the Ministry of Internal Affairs of India to the Chinese Embassy in India”.
[10] See "Memorandum from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China to the Embassy of India in China (November 3, 1958)", in Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China: Compilation of Documents on Sino-Indian Boundary Issues and Other Issues concerning the Relations between the Two Countries in Tibet, China and India (August 1950-April 1960), p. 295; see also "Memorandum from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China to the Embassy of India in China," in Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China.
[11] See Report of Chinese Officials on Statements and Comments Made by the Chinese Side at Meetings between Government Officials of the Two Countries, compiled by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China, Report of Officials of the Government of the People's Republic of China and Officials of the Government of India on Boundary Issues, p. 75.
[12] See Report of Indian Officials on the Statements and Comments Made by the Indian Side in the Meetings between the Officials of the Two Governments, compiled by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China, Report of the Officials of the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of India on the Border Issue, pp. 150-166.
[13] Legal Statues of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v. Norway), Judgement, I.C.J. Reports 1933, p. 6, p. 45.
[14] Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law, translated by Zeng Lingliang, Yu Minyou and others, Beijing: Law Press, 2007 edition, p. 311.
[15] Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia v. Malaysisa), I.C.J. Reports 2002, p. 32, paras. 148-149.
[16] Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras), Judgement, I.C.J. Reports 2012, p. 655.
[17] Territorial and Maritime Dispute in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras), Judgement, I.C.J. Reports 2007, p. 12, p. 46.
[18] Mojtaba Kazazi, "Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A Study on Evisence before International Tribunals," Kluwer Law International, vol. 24, Issue 6, 1995, pp. 347-350.
[19] Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia v. Malaysisa), I.C.J. Reports 2002, p. 32, paras. 682-685.
[20] Xinjiang Tongzhi - Mapping Zhi Compilation Committee: Xinjiang Tongzhi, Volume 54, Mapping Zhi, Urumqi: Xinjiang People's Publishing House, 1996, p. 180.
[21] See Xinjiang Tongzhi - Highway and Transportation Zhi, Compilation Committee: Xinjiang Tongzhi, Vol. 48, Highway and Transportation Zhi, Urumqi, Xinjiang People's Publishing House, 1998 edition, pp. 115-118.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.