Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Effect of RCDP Training Method on Quality Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Nursing Undergraduates Using SimpadPlus Feedback: A Randomized and Controlled Trial

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/phpm.2023.030502 | Downloads: 15 | Views: 320

Author(s)

Kaiqi Chen 1, Cuihuan Hu 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Corresponding Author

Cuihuan Hu

ABSTRACT

The Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP) is a simulation-based training approach that gradually enhances muscle memory through repeated practice and targeted feedback in real-life situations. This article aims to investigate the RCDP training method's effectiveness based on feedback in assessing nursing students' cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality. The study included 48 nursing students from a particular school's 2020 cohort. The students were randomly divided into two groups using computerized randomization. The experimental group (Group A, n=24) used the RCDP method to simulate CPR under the guidance of a teacher, while the control group (Group B, n=24) used traditional methods for practice. The students received one hour of theoretical training and two hours of practical training. Knowledge questionnaires were distributed before and after the theoretical training, and the SimPad Plus was used to collect student assessment data after the practical training. The quality of the skills assessment of the two groups was compared, including the number of compressions, average compression depth, compression recoil pass rate, compression depth pass rate, compression frequency, number of ventilations, ventilation volume, and student satisfaction with teaching. The results showed statistically significant differences in the pass rates between the two groups in terms of total compressions, compression frequency, ventilations, and total ventilations (P<0.01). The experimental group had a higher pass rate of compression recoil than the control group (P<0.01), a shorter average interrupt time during compression (P<0.01), and a higher pass rate of compression depth (P<0.01). The CPR quality of nursing students was improved, enabling them to perform CPR more accurately and effectively. Learner feedback was positive, indicating that they believed the experience would improve their clinical performance. In conclusion, the RCDP training method based on SimPad Plus feedback, through expert feedback, repeated practice, and real-time feedback from simulated patients, is beneficial in improving the quality of CPR among nursing students.r of 60-point.

KEYWORDS

Simulation, Rapid cycle deliberate practice, Basic life support, Nursing education, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Emergency medicine education

CITE THIS PAPER

Kaiqi Chen, Cuihuan Hu, Effect of RCDP Training Method on Quality Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Nursing Undergraduates Using SimpadPlus Feedback: A Randomized and Controlled Trial. MEDS Public Health and Preventive Medicine (2023) Vol. 3: 7-12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/phpm.2023.030502.

REFERENCES

[1] McPhee K. Deliberate Practice Mock Codes for New Graduate Nurses. [J]. Journal for nurses in professional development, 2018, 34(6): 348-351. 
[2] Oermann M H, Krusmark M A, Kardong-Edgren S, et al. Training interval in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. [J]. PloS one, 2020, 15(1): e0226786. 
[3] Panchal A R, Bartos J A, Cabanas J G, et al. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. [J]. Circulation, 2020, 142(16_suppl_2): S366-S468. 
[4] Hunt Elizabetha, Duval-Arnould Jordanm, Nelson-McMillan Kristenl, et al. Pediatric resident resuscitation skills improve after ”rapid cycle deliberate practice” training. [J]. Resuscitation, 2014, 85(7): 51-945. 
[5] Blanchard E, Booker D, Peterson D T, et al. Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice: Application to Adult Advanced Life Support. [J]. MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2022, 18: 11269. 
[6] Chamunyonga C, Edwards C, Caldwell P, et al. Exploring the Role and Application of the Deliberate Practice Concept in Radiation Therapy. [J]. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences, 2018, 49(3): 237-242. 
[7] Zhou Zhiyong, Li Shiyong, Liu Chunyan, et al. Effects of rapid cycle deliberate practice on defibrillation skills training for residents of anesthesiology[J].  Chinese Journal of Medical Education , 2021, 41(5): 464-467. 
[8] Gong Zheng, Zhao Dan, Li Chunyan, et al. Effect of CPR feedback devices on chest compression quality test[J]. Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2018, 27(2): 183-187. 
[9] Taras J, Everett T. Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice in Medical Education - a Systematic Review. [J]. Cureus, 2017, 9(4): e1180. 
[10] Chancey R J, Sampayo E M, Lemke D S, et al. Learners' Experiences During Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Simulations: A Qualitative Analysis. [J]. Simulation in healthcare: journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2019, 14(1): 18-28. 
[11] Issenberg S B, McGaghie W C, Petrusa E R, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. [J]. Medical teacher, 2005, 27(1): 10-28. 
[12] Tang Jiaying, Shao Qingmei, Guo Zhiyan, et al. Application progress of rapid cycle deliberate practice in nurse professional skills training[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(02): 253-256. 
[13] Cheng A, Nadkarni V M, Mancini M B, et al. Resuscitation Education Science: Educational Strategies to Improve Outcomes From Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. [Z]. 2018. 138, e82-e122. 
[14] Anderson R, Sebaldt A, Lin Y, et al. Optimal training frequency for acquisition and retention of high-quality CPR skills: A randomized trial. [J]. Resuscitation, 2019, 135: 153-161.

Downloads: 1831
Visits: 85835

Sponsors, Associates, and Links


All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.