Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Science of Law Journal
  4. Vol 2, Issue 9, 2023

The Subjective Status of Artificial Intelligence in Civil Law

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.020903 | Downloads: 16 | Views: 325

Author(s)

Zhen Dai 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Law School, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China

Corresponding Author

Zhen Dai

ABSTRACT

With the development of big data and the rapid changes in technology, artificial intelligence has gradually become involved in our daily lives, and has even become an indispensable tool for contemporary young people. At present, the forms of artificial intelligence are gradually diversifying, and in this regard, a series of related legal issues have arisen. To today's level of science and technology and the degree of robot autonomy, artificial intelligence should be the object, that is, as a civil law object, but a number of scientists have predicted that in the next ten years or even a few years, artificial intelligence can reach 80% of human intelligence, so at this time, strong artificial intelligence can be the status of the subject of civil law to engage in a variety of behaviours and bear the corresponding responsibility is the focus of the discussion. This paper will analyse the current situation of the development of artificial intelligence, its challenge to the civil law, its legal status of the debate, the feasibility of its legal subject status and the foreign legal regulation and judicial practice of the significance of China's legislation from five perspectives, to explore the types of legal attributes of artificial intelligence as a modern or future essential existence.

KEYWORDS

Artificial intelligence; legal subject status; civil capacity; civil rights capacity

CITE THIS PAPER

Zhen Dai, The Subjective Status of Artificial Intelligence in Civil Law. Science of Law Journal (2023) Vol. 2: 18-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2023.020903.

REFERENCES

[1] Jianfeng Cao, "Artificial Intelligence: machine discrimination and countermeasures", Information Security and Communication Secrecy, Vol. 12, 2016
[2] Chen Jidong. On the Legal Personality of Robots - A Discussion Based on Legal Interpretation [J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition), 2018, 35(03):78-89. 
[3] Chongqing NPC, NPC Reference 2019(08). 
[4] Chu Qingqing. Research on the status of the legal subject of artificial intelligence - analysis based on the perspective of rights and power [J]. Future and development, 2019, 43(09):15-18. 
[5] Fang Shaokun, Lin Guanghui. The discursive thoughts on the suitability of civil subject of artificial intelligence. Journal of Soochow University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) 2018(05):64~72, 191. 
[6] Guo Shaofei. The legal subject theory of "electronic person"[J]. Oriental Law, 2018(03):38-49. 
[7] Hao Tiechuan. The impact of artificial intelligence on the rule of law must not be fantasised and overestimated [J]. Legal Daily, 2018 (1). 
[8] Li Aijun. Theory of legal behaviour of artificial intelligence [J]. Politics and law forum, 2019, 37(03):176-183. 
[9] Lu Ping. Overseas Artificial Intelligence Development Direction and Experience, China Electronic Information Industry Research and Development Institute, 2018(12). 
[10] Ren Yanwu, Wang Wenbo. Feasibility analysis of clarifying the civil subject status or rights of artificial intelligence [J]. Pearl River Discussion Series, 2019(02):27-46. 
[11] Wang Liming. The challenge of artificial intelligence to civil law [N]. China city newspaper, 2017-09-11(022). 
[12] Wang Liming. New challenges to civil jurisprudence in the era of artificial intelligence [J]. Oriental Law, 2018(03):4-9. 
[13] Yang Lixin. Artificial class personality: The civil law status of intelligent robots--Another discussion on the civil liability for damages caused by intelligent robots [J]. Journal of seeking truth, 2018, 45(04):84-96. 
[14] Yang Lixin. An attempt to solve the legal adjustment problem of artificial intelligence with the current civil law rules [J]. Zhongzhou Journal, 2018(07):40-49. 
[15] Yang Lixin, Zhu Chengyi. The negation of animal personality: the legal "object" of animals [J]. Legal Research, 2004(5): 86-102. 
[16] Yin Weimin. On the right subject of artificial intelligence works--Another comment on the legal personality of artificial intelligence [J]. Science and Publication, 2018(10):102-107. 
[17] Yuan Zeng. Artificial intelligence limited legal personality review [J]. Oriental Law, 2017(5):50-57. 
[18] Zhang Zhijian. On the electronic legal person status of artificial intelligence [J]. Modern Law, 2019, 41(05):75-88. 
[19] Yin Jianping, Zhu En, Liu Yue, and others. Stuart J. Russell, Peter Norvig. artificial intelligence:a modern approach [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2017:17.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.