Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. MEDS Clinical Medicine
  4. Vol 4, Issue 7, 2023

Study of the Value of Hyperechogenicity and Related Acoustic Features in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in Breast Nodules

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/medsc.2023.040710 | Downloads: 6 | Views: 254

Author(s)

Shuowen Wang 1, Yan Wang 1, Juan Cheng 1, Jinfu Chen 1, Lilong Zhuang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, 571199, China

Corresponding Author

Shuowen Wang

ABSTRACT

To invest the diagnostic value of hyperecho and related acoustic features in break schedules in break cancer. The ultrasonic features of 90 cases of hyperechoic break schedules confirmed by pathology were retrospectively analyzed, including 49 cases of the sign group and 41 cases of the minor group. The ultra-graphic features of the two groups were compared and observed, including morphology, orientation, edge, calibration, interior echo, blood supply, hyperechoic Corona, etc. Multivariate Logistic regression model was used to screen the risk ultra sound signals of hyperechoic break schedules. ROC curve was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic validity of ultrasound for hyperechoic break rules by AUC. There were statistically significant differences in the morphology, orientation, margin, calibration, and echo halos between the two groups (x ²= 14.504, 5.511, 42.643, 9.870, 26.071, all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the posterior echo and blood supply (x ²= /, 2.089, P>0.05). The Multivariate Logistic regression model was shown that margin unbalances and microcalculation were the risk ultra sound signals of hyperechoic break schedules. The ROC curve was drawn based on the probability value of this model to predict hyperechoic break cancer, and the AUC was 0.912, the sensitivity was 0.829, the specificity was 0.918. Marginal unconsolidation and microcalcification are important ultra-signs of hyperechoic break nodules, which have high value in predicting hyperechoic break cancer.

KEYWORDS

Break rules; Hyperecho; Related acoustic characteristics; Break cancer; Diagnostic effectiveness

CITE THIS PAPER

Shuowen Wang, Yan Wang, Juan Cheng, Jinfu Chen, Lilong Zhuang, Study of the Value of Hyperechogenicity and Related Acoustic Features in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in Breast Nodules. MEDS Clinical Medicine (2023) Vol. 4: 52-59. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/medsc.2023.040710.

REFERENCES

[1] Sung H, Ferrary J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Morality Worldwide for 36 Cancer in 185 Counties [J]. CA Cancer J Clin 2021,71:209-249. 
[2] Du YR, Wu Y, Chen M, et al. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small bread sections[J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcircle 2018; 70 (3): 291-300. 
[3] Codreanu M, Fernoagă, C, Cornilă, M, et al. Study regarding the correlation between the clinical features and/or the type of ultrasound changes in the diagnosis of the parenchymatous diseases in dog[J]. Internal Medicine Journal, 2010, 40(40):51-59.
[4] Jung H K , Kim S J , Kim W, et al. Ultrasound Features and Rate of Upgrade to Malignancy in Atypical Apocrine Lesions of the Breast[J].Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2020, 39(8):1517-1524.
[5] Huibing W , Hai W , Jufang C ,et al. Value of acoustic velocity matching technique in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules[J]. Shanxi Medical Journal, 2017, 46(12):1419-1421.
[6] Nelson RA, Guye ML, Lu T, et al. Survival outputs of metaplastic breast cancer patients: results from a US population based analysis [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2015,22 (1): 24-31.
[7] Nechuta S, Lu W, Zheng Y, et al. Comorbidities and break cancer survival: a report from the Shanghai Break Cancer Survival Study[J]. Break Cancer Res Treatment May 2013; 139 (1): 227-235. 
[8] Ugnat AM, Xie L, Morris J, et al. Survival of women with break cancer in Ottawa, Canada: variation with age, stage, history, grade and treatment[J]. Br J Cancer 2004 Mar 22; 90 (6): 1138-1143.
[9] DeFilippis RA, Chang H, Dumont N, et al. CD36 expression actives a multicellular conventional program shared by high macroscopic density and tumor issues[J]. Cancer Discov 2012 Sep; 2 (9): 826-839. 
[10] Shi XQ, Li JL, Wan WB, et al. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultra sound BI-RADS to assess benigning and malignent break sections[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Apr; 41 (4): 960-966. 
[11] Park C S , Lee J H , Yim H W , et al. Observer Agreement Using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-Ultrasound, First Edition (2003)[J]. Korean Journal of Radiology, 2007, 8(5):397-402.
[12] Linda A, Zuiani C, Lorenzon M, et al. AJR Am. J Roentgenol, 2011, 196 (5): 1219-1204.
[13] Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid break schedules: use of biography to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions [J]. Radiology, 1995, 196 (1): 123-134. 
[14] Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC, et a1 Benign versus malignant solid break masses: US differentiation [J]. Radiology, 1999, 213 (3): 889-894.
[15] Del Frate C, Bestagno A, Cerniato R, et al. Sonographic criteria for differentiation of benign and malignant solid bread regions: size is of value [J]. Radio Med, 2006111:783-796. 
[16] Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, et al. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features [J]. AJR, 2005, 184:1260-1265. 
[17] Wang Xinyi, Cui Ligang, Huo Ling. High echogenic breast lesions that are prone to misdiagnosis [J]. Chinese Medical Science Journal, 2015, 37 (05): 575-579.
[18] Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid break schedules: use of biography to differentiate between benigning and malignent intervals [J]. Radiology, 1995, 196:123-134. 
[19] Nam SY, Ko ES, Han BK, et al. Ultrasonic hyperechoic lesions of the bread: are they always being signed? [J]. Acta Radio, 2015, 56 (1): 18-24.

Subscription
E-Mail Alert
Most popular papers
Call for Special Issue
Publication Ethics & OA Statement
Plagiarism Policy
Contact Us
Downloads: 4553
Visits: 196971

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.