Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Policy Accumulation and Social Organization Development: Research Based on Social Organization Policies in China from 2004 to 2021

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/polsr.2023.040406 | Downloads: 9 | Views: 277

Author(s)

Xu Mengying 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Corresponding Author

Xu Mengying

ABSTRACT

While there is broad scholarly agreement on the relationship that policy accumulation is the driver of social organization development, research on the extent to which policy accumulation triggers social organization development is still in its infancy. To address this research gap, we analyze the evolution of policy accumulation and clarify the inherent relationship between policy accumulation and the development of social organizations. Based on 471 central-level social organization policies, we show that there are 52 policy target-instrument combinations in the social organization policy area; the evolution of policy accumulation is divided into five stages; policy accumulation is continuous and drives the development of social organizations; and there is a delay effect.

KEYWORDS

Policy accumulation; social organizations; policy text; policy instrument

CITE THIS PAPER

Xu Mengying, Policy Accumulation and Social Organization Development: Research Based on Social Organization Policies in China from 2004 to 2021. Journal of Political Science Research (2023) Vol. 4: 39-46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/polsr.2023.040406.

REFERENCES

[1] Christoph K. and Yves S. (2022) Crises as driver of policy accumulation: Regulatory change and ratcheting in German asylum policies between 1975 and 2019. Regulation & Governance, 16, 603-617.
[2] Li YM and Liang B. (2017) Policies of Social Organizations in China: Historical Change, Institutional Logic and Innovative Orientation. Social Policy Research, 1, 61-71.
[3] Capano G. (2009) Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11, 7–31.
[4] Qu ZX. (2017) Understand the Public Policy Termination from the Perspective of "Process". Chinese Public Administration, 11, 79-83.
[5] Wang YL and Liu YZ. (2021) Adaptive Equilibrium and Collaborative Governance in Policy Tool Selection—Research Based on Social Organization Policy Texts. Journal of Sichuan University: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 3, 155-162.
[6] Shao RW, Li MZ and Xu WW. (2021) Analysis and evaluation of social organization policies based on policy tool theory--Research on policy texts from 2008 to 2019. China Third Sector Research, 1, 3-29.
[7] Eladis P., Hill M., and Howlett M., (2005) Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, 63.
[8] Chen TX and Wang Jiali. (2019) Research on the Influencing Factors and Stratification of the Development of Non-governmental Organizations—Interprovincial Panel Analysis Based on Spatial Spillover Effect in China. Journal of  South China Normal Universit: Social Science Ediiton, 6,  113-124.
[9] Jia ZK and Luo ZH. (2020) Social Organization Governance in the New Era: Facing Problems and Path Choice. Academic Exchange, 3,134-143.
[10] Yu JX and Shen YD. (2017) Adaptive Cooperation: The Strategic Reform of the Government-Social Organizations Relations Since the 18th CPC National Congress.CASS Journal of Political Science, 3, 34-41.
[11] Christoph K., Christina S., and Yves S.Balancing. (2021) Trade-Offs between Policy Responsiveness and Effectiveness: The Impact of Vertical Policy-Process Integration on Policy Accumulation. Public Administration Review, 81,157-160.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.