Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Evolution of Research on Curriculum Understanding Paradigms in China and Abroad

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/curtm.2024.070903 | Downloads: 17 | Views: 777

Author(s)

Xu Rui 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing City, Guangdong Province, China

Corresponding Author

Xu Rui

ABSTRACT

From the 1970s to the 1990s, the curriculum field in the United States had undergone a profound revolution of curriculum "paradigm shift", from the traditional curriculum field centered on curriculum development to the contemporary curriculum field centered on curriculum understanding, and curriculum concepts and methodologies had experienced a comprehensive reconstruction. Chinese scholars launched their researches on curriculum understanding relatively late, most of which were based on foreign research results, while local theoretical researches on curriculum understanding is still insufficient. Sorting out curriculum understanding paradigms in China and abroad is not only a way to go back to the origin of the research, trace the roots and grasp the development vein of the research issues, but also a way to stand on the "shoulders of giants", look far ahead of the research issues, interpret theories from different perspectives, and explore innovations.

KEYWORDS

Evolution, curriculum understanding paradigms

CITE THIS PAPER

Xu Rui, The Evolution of Research on Curriculum Understanding Paradigms in China and Abroad. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2024) Vol. 7: 22-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2024.070903.

REFERENCES

[1] Xie Dengbin. Research on Contemporary American Curriculum Discourse [D]. Shanghai: Doctoral Dissertation from East China Normal University, 2005:22. 
[2] [USA]Grumet M.R. Autobiography and Reconceptualization[M]. In Giroux H.A. et al. (eds). New York: Curriculum & Instruction. 1981:140.
[3] Zhang Hua. Experiential Curriculum Theory [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press, 2000:131-132.
[4] Huang Wentao. Dole's postmodern curriculum View and its Enlightenment to China's education [J]. Journal of Advanced Correspondence Education (Zhe Society Edition), 2002 (06): 32-36.
[5] Wang Xia. The characteristics of postmodern curriculum research and its significance to curriculum reform in China [J]. Education Review, 2002(06): 18-20. 
[6] [USA]W.E. Doll. A Post-modern Perspective on Curriculum[M]. Translated by Wang Hongyu. Beijing: Education Science Press, 2015: 166.
[7] Jin Shenghong. Understanding and Education: An Introduction to Educational Philosophy towards Philosophical Hermeneutics [M]. Beijing: Educational Science Press, 1997:44. 
[8] Wang Xia. Curriculum Research: From Modern to Postmodern [J]. Journal of Education Science, Hunan Normal University, 2003 (01): 32-36. 
[9] Wang Baoxing. From "Curriculum Development" to "Curriculum Understanding": A historical interpretation of the transformation of American curriculum paradigm [J]. Journal of Henan University (Social Science Edition), 2016 (03): 1-6. 
[10] [Germany]Husserl. The Crisis of European Science and the Phenomenology of Transcendence [M]. Translated by Wang Bingwen Beijing: Commercial Press, 2003:418-419. 

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.