The feasibility of criminal law retroactivity of Chinese convicted criminals
DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030721 | Downloads: 16 | Views: 590
Author(s)
Aoyu Liu 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Journalism and Media, Shijiazhuang University, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, China
Corresponding Author
Aoyu LiuABSTRACT
China's traditional criminal law theory holds that there is no retroactivity of convicted criminals, but with the increase of criminal legislation and the changes of the times, there has been an unfair phenomenon of 'different punishments for the same crime', which is bound to conflict with the principle of constitutional equality, and is not conducive to the implementation of the principle of legality and the protection of human rights. Therefore, a special relief system can be established to make convicted criminals have retroactivity, so as to seek a balance between maintaining the stability of judgments, legal dignity and safeguarding legal fairness and justice.
KEYWORDS
Retrospective effect, convicted person, special remedy, legal justiceCITE THIS PAPER
Aoyu Liu. The feasibility of criminal law retroactivity of Chinese convicted criminals. Science of Law Journal (2024) Vol. 3: 160-165. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2024.030721.
REFERENCES
[1] [Italy] Padovani. Principles of Italian Criminal Law. Translated by Chen Zhonglin, Law Press, 1998: 37.
[2] Jin Zongli. Discussion on the Change of Law after the Judgment. Military Law Special Issue, 2008, 4: 18-19.
[3] Tian Xiwen. The Imbalance of Penalties for Convicted Offenders Due to Changes in Criminal Law and Its Correction. Journal of the East University of Politics and Law, 2020, 2.
[4] Wang Shitao, Tang Zhefeng. Constitutional interpretation of the effectiveness of the original judicial ruling after the abolition of hooliganism. Political and Legal Theory Series, 2011, 2:60-61.
[5] [US] John Rawls. Theory of Justice. Translated by He Huaihong, China Social Science Press, 1988:1-2.
[6] Yin Jianfeng, Wang Na. Reconstruction of Modern Pardon System. Beijing: China People's Public Security University Press, 2011: 449-450.
[7] Shi Jinghai. A Review of the System of Penalty Reduction in China, Beijing: Law Press, 2008: 63-64.
[8] Chen Wei. The Problem of Limitation of Prosecution after Adjustment of Statutory Penalty and Its Clarification - An Investigation Centered on the Supreme People's Court's Answer. Global Legal Review, 2018, 2: 86-87.
[9] Saul Levmore. Changes, Anticipations, and Reparations. Columbia Law Review, 1999.
Downloads: | 13372 |
---|---|
Visits: | 428138 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting