Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Research on Challenges and Legal Measures for Personal Data Protection in Generative AI

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040114 | Downloads: 14 | Views: 501

Author(s)

Wang Jiayi 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Chaoyang, Beijing, China

Corresponding Author

Wang Jiayi

ABSTRACT

GenAI jeopardizes personal data through misinformation proliferation, invasive profiling, and algorithmic opacity. Current legal frameworks lack AI-specific adaptability, failing to address synthetic data governance and risk escalation. Urgent reforms demand adaptive legislation harmonizing GDPR/PIPL standards, strengthened enforcement mandates, and ISO 31700-certified privacy engineering. Key priorities are defining algorithmic accountability, creating systems for certifying synthetic content, and integrating Privacy-by-Design principles in AI development for a balance between innovation and data protection.

KEYWORDS

Generative Artificial Intelligence, Protection of personal data, Legal issues, Response strategies

CITE THIS PAPER

Wang Jiayi. Research on Challenges and Legal Measures for Personal Data Protection in Generative AI. Science of Law Journal (2025) Vol. 4: 100-105. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040114.

REFERENCES

[1] Mao Taota, Tang Gan, Ma Jiawei, Liu Jie. A study on the identification of factors influencing the willingness of artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC) users to adopt: A case study of ChatGPT [J]. Journal of Intelligence, Science and Technology, 2023, 40(8): 1-15.
[2] Dong Hao. The communication ethics risks of human-machine dialogue in the era of generative artificial intelligence and its response [J]. Yuejiang Academic Journal, 2024, 19(1): 1-11.
[3] Bai Long. Reflection and reconstruction: the 'China solution' to artificial intelligence in the process of Chinese-style modernisation – a summary of the special forum ‘Empowerment and innovation: artificial intelligence and Chinese-style modernisation’ [J]. Yuejiang Academic Journal, 2023, 18(6): 1-9.
[4] Guo Chenzhen. Coherent legal governance of generative Al: taking generative pre-trained models (GPT) as an example, Modern Law, 2023(3): 88-107.
[5] Ruan Shenyu: The tort law protection of personal information from the perspective of the Civil Code: focusing on factual uncertainty and its resolution. Jurist, 2020(4):29-39, 192.
[6] Wang Xiaolin, Xie Niyun. Future industry: connotative characteristics, organisational change and ecological construction [J]. Social Sciences Journal, 2023(6): 173-182.
[7] Chen Yuheng. Construction of a full-process compliance system for personal information protection in generative artificial intelligence [J]. Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law, 2024, 27 (02): 37-51.
[8] Wang Xiaoli and Yan Chi. Risk Issues and Regulatory Approaches of Large Generative AI Models: Taking GPT-4 as an Example [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 36(4): 1-11.
[9] Tong Xiaodong: Risk and Control: On the Protection of Personal Information in the Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence [J]. Political Science Forum, 2023, (04): 59-68.
[10] Gao Desheng, Ji Yan. Research on personal information security governance strategies in the era of artificial intelligence [J]. Journal of Intelligence Science, 2021, 39(8): 53-59.
[11] Ong L C J ,Seng J J B ,Law F Z J , et al. Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, and other large language models for social determinants of health: Current state and future directions. [J]. Cell reports. Medicine, 2024, 5 (1): 101356-101356.
[12] Wilson E S ,Nishimoto M .Assessing Learning of Computer Programing  Skills in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence. [J]. Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2024, 146 (5).

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.