Author(s)

Yang Xinyi ¹, Liu Shu ¹, Wu Cuiping ¹, Lin Hongtao ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, 524000, China

Corresponding Author

Yang Xinyi

ABSTRACT

ChatGPT is fine-tuned from the large-scale pre-trained language model GPT-3.5, which achieves better results in comprehension, result accuracy, and the ability to recognize illegitimacy and bias. Focusing on the science and technology ethics and academic ethics of ChatGPT technology, we conduct an in-depth analysis and assessment of the technical principles, technical risks, security issues, and social impacts of ChatGPT technology. We hope that through these efforts, we can better promote the healthy development of ChatGPT technology, facilitate the continuous progress of science and technology, and make ChatGPT technology better serve the society with human welfare as the core.

KEYWORDS

ChatGPT, ethics of science and technology, academic ethics, artificial intelligence

CITE THIS PAPER

Yang Xinyi, Liu Shu, Wu Cuiping, Lin Hongtao. The AI that Causes Fire and Trouble: Research on Countermeasures for the Legal and Ethical Dilemmas of ChatGPT. Science of Law Journal (2025) Vol. 4: 125-133. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040118.

REFERENCES

[1] Yu Xingzhong, Zheng Ge, Ding Xiaodong. Six issues in generative artificial intelligence and law:The case of ChatGPT [J]. China law review,2023,(02):1-20.
[2] Wang, Chunhui. The Ethical Issues of ChatGPT Should Be Highly Concerned[J]. China Telecommunications Industry, 2023,(06):56-58.
[3] Zhao Jingwu, ChatGPT Review and Reflection on Ethical Rules of Science and Technology in Risk Governance[J]. Journal of Sustainable Development Economics,2023,(04):28-30.
[4] Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024[R/OL].(2024-04-26)[2024-04-30]. https://aiindex. stan‐ford. edu/report/.
[5] Khasawneh O Y. Technophobia without Boarders: TheInfluence of Technophobia and Emotional Intelli‐gence on Technology Acceptance and the ModeratingInfluence of Organizational Climate [J]. Computers inHuman Behavior, 2018(88): 210-218.
[6] Lavi, Michal. "Targeting Children: Liability for Algorithmic Recommendations." Am. UL Rev. 73 (2023): 1367
[7] Hou Li-Yang, Li Zhao-Xuan. Legal Challenges and Institutional Responses in the Academic Use of ChatGPT[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Philosophy Social Science Edition), 2023,(04):29-39. DOI:10.16164/j. cnki.22-1062/c.2023.04.004.
[8] Zhou Shuhuan. Research on legal personality dispute and communication tort liability of chatbots: based on ChatGPT scene perspective [J]. NANJING SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2023,(06):90-99. DOI:10.15937/j.cnki.issn1001- 8263.2023.06.010.
[9] Yuan Chen, Qiusheng Huang. Ethical Risks of Artificial Intelligence in ChatGPT Technology and Its Scientific Dispelling[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2023.
[10] LIN Xin, LIU Zefei. Quality assessment and application strategy of ChatGPT generated reviews[J]. Library and Intelligence Work, 2024.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
  
  
• Information and Knowledge Management
  
  
• Military and Armament Science
  
  
• Media and Communication Research
  
  
• Journal of Human Movement Science
  
  
• Art and Performance Letters
  
  
• Lecture Notes on History
  
  
• Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
  
  
• Philosophy Journal
  
  
• Journal of Political Science Research
  
  
• Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
  
  
• Advances in Broadcasting