Research on the Copyright Issues of AIGC Artistic Works
DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040215 | Downloads: 10 | Views: 385
Author(s)
Xuan Zhao 1, Fanyu Zhou 2
Affiliation(s)
1 Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China
2 Changchun Humanities and Sciences College, Changchun, Jilin, 130117, China
Corresponding Author
Fanyu ZhouABSTRACT
AI technology is rapidly evolving into an overwhelming productive force. Generative AI has subverted traditional methods of artistic creation, yet legal frameworks have lagged in addressing copyright issues regarding AI-generated content (AIGC). This paper explores three key questions: Who holds the copyright to AIGC works? Do AIGC works meet the originality requirement for copyright protection? Does generating works in a style similar to existing artworks constitute infringement? Through empirical observation, practical creation, and literature review, this paper argues that AI software providers merely offer tools and cannot claim copyright over generated works. AIGC works satisfy the originality criteria under copyright law, while AI-generated imitations of existing artists' styles may constitute infringement.
KEYWORDS
AIGC; Copyright; Infringement; Artistic WorksCITE THIS PAPER
Xuan Zhao, Fanyu Zhou. Research on the Copyright Issues of AIGC Artistic Works. Science of Law Journal (2025) Vol. 4: 123-128. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040215.
REFERENCES
[1] Wang Q. Legal Status of AI-Generated Content[J]. Law Science, 2017, 5.
[2] Zhu J J. Copyright Infringement in Generative AI[J]. Intellectual Property, 2025.2.
[3] Xiong Q. Copyright Determination for AI-Generated Content[J]. Intellectual Property, 2017, 3.
[4] Junhe Legal Review. Analysis of four highlights of the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services [DB/OL]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/0kJn318qnGZwQrpd-ahw. 2023.7.24
[5] Tsinghua University & AsiaInfo.A White Paper on AIGC (GPT-4) Enabling Applications in the Communications Industry [DB/OL]. https://download.s21i.faiusr.com/13115299/0/1/ABUIABA9GAAg0KKaoQYogr_N1gc.pdf?f= 2023%E5%B9%B4AIGC%EF%BC%88GPT-4%EF%BC%89%E8%B5%8B%E8%83%BD%E9%80%9A%E4%BF%A1%E8%A1%8C%E4%B8%9A%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E4% B9%A6%EF%BC%882023%E5%B9%B4%E7%89%88%EF%BC%89.pdf&v=1680249168, 2023.4.13.
[6] Sun Y Z. Forum on High-Quality Development and Intellectual Property Innovation [DB/OL]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzIwNDExO-TI5Mw==&mid=2656985492&idx=1&sn=b7fe0591e0181faab1da5ad127143aea&chksm=8d6fcc06ba18451034cc7bd2b42b3f6b040 fb769dad410203b282deb8cf2f5e89f0f0a201555&scene=27,2023.4.14
[7] Kong X J. Intellectual Property Protection for AI: Current Status and Prospects [N]. Guangming Daily. 2019.8.30
[8] Nimmer D. Copyright in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Authorship and originality [J]. Houston Law Review, 2001, 38(1),159.
[9] Yang L H. Originality Standards for AI-Generated Content[J]. Journal of Beihang University, 2024, 3.
[10] Tang Y L. On the subject of rights for AI-generated works And the ownership of its copyright[J]. Fujian Forum, 2023.11.
Downloads: | 13372 |
---|---|
Visits: | 428102 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting