Author(s)

Zhang Yining ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ School of Law, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong, China

Corresponding Author

Zhang Yining

ABSTRACT

The controversy surrounding the adjustment of the minimum age of criminal responsibility for juveniles, driven by judicial cases, essentially centers on the tension between deterrence through punishment and the protection of minors. Taking low-age heinous crimes in judicial practice as the entry point, this study systematically dissects the theoretical foundations, legislative motivations, and practical driving logic underlying the adjustment of the minimum age of criminal responsibility. It argues that the adjustment must be predicated on strictly defined applicable conditions, and through the establishment of a dynamic evaluation system that integrates the gravity of criminal conduct and individual culpability, achieve precise calibration of penalties. Concurrently, it necessitates the implementation of special safeguard mechanisms within criminal procedural frameworks and the development of pathways for the integration of penal execution with social rehabilitation measures to mitigate the risk of institutional distortion. This study innovatively proposes a closed-loop research framework of "judicial cases-legislative response-institutional refinement," offering theoretical underpinnings and institutional recommendations for resolving the dilemmas in the governance of juvenile delinquency.

KEYWORDS

Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility for Juveniles; Judicial Cases-Driven Approach; Evaluation of Culpability/Responsibility Capacity; Safeguards in Criminal Procedure

CITE THIS PAPER

Zhang Yining. Research on Strategies for Lowering the Age of Criminal Responsibility for Minors Driven by Judicial Cases. Science of Law Journal (2025) Vol. 4: 151-156. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040320.

REFERENCES

[1] Man I A C .Research on Maintaining Judicial Fairness: Institutional Innovation and Practical Exploration[J].SHS Web of Conferences,2025,213
[2] Berk A R ,Kuchibhotla K A ,Tchetgen T E .Improving Fairness in Criminal Justice Algorithmic Risk Assessments Using Optimal Transport and Conformal Prediction Sets[J].Sociological Methods & Research, 2024, 53(4):1629-1675.
[3] Wilding J .Legal aid and the future of access to justice[J].Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 2024, 46(4):657-659.
[4] Beardall R T .Legal reality or legal mirage? Examining the relationship between police violence, legal consciousness, and the promise of civil legal justice[J].Punishment & Society,2024,26(4):629-646.
[5] Shen R .Application of Synthetic Data in Artificial Intelligence Trials from the Perspective of Judicial Justice[J]. Science of Law Journal,2024,3(3).

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
  
  
• Information and Knowledge Management
  
  
• Military and Armament Science
  
  
• Media and Communication Research
  
  
• Journal of Human Movement Science
  
  
• Art and Performance Letters
  
  
• Lecture Notes on History
  
  
• Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
  
  
• Philosophy Journal
  
  
• Journal of Political Science Research
  
  
• Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
  
  
• Advances in Broadcasting