Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Preventive Mechanisms in German Environmental Public Interest Litigation: A Dual-Track Framework of Public Interest Representatives and Citizen Enforcement

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040408 | Downloads: 5 | Views: 159

Author(s)

Gu Yuxin 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Southwest Petroleum University, No. 8 Xindu Avenue, Chengdu, China

Corresponding Author

Gu Yuxin

ABSTRACT

This article examines the preventive function realization pathways of Germany's environmental administrative public interest litigation system, which has emerged as a crucial mechanism for ensuring effective environmental governance. Through a dual-track framework combining the public interest representative system and environmental group litigation, Germany has institutionalized judicial oversight to preempt environmental risks at their source. The public interest representative system, anchored in statutory authority and procedural innovations (e.g., preventive injunction suits, relaxed standing rules, and evidence burden shifts), enables early judicial intervention in administrative decisions. Concurrently, environmental groups, empowered by broad standing under the Environmental Legal Remedies Act (2006) and Federal Nature Conservation Act, leverage their flexibility to challenge unlawful permits and planning approvals, including through groundbreaking "preventive injunction lawsuits" for projects in early stages. Key legislative and jurisprudential developments—such as the incorporation of the Aarhus Convention and EU directives—have expanded litigation scopes while balancing environmental protection with economic interests. By analyzing these mechanisms' synergies, the study highlights how Germany's system transforms constitutional environmental obligations into actionable judicial tools, offering a model for preventive environmental governance.

KEYWORDS

Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation, Preventive Function, Public Interest Representative System, Environmental Group Litigation, Germany

CITE THIS PAPER

Gu Yuxin. Preventive Mechanisms in German Environmental Public Interest Litigation: A Dual-Track Framework of Public Interest Representatives and Citizen Enforcement. Science of Law Journal (2025) Vol. 4: 48-55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040408.

REFERENCES

[1] Si Linbo, Xu Fangfang. Review and Reference of German Ecological Accountability System[J]. Changbai Journal, 2016(5):58-65.
[2] Kloepfer, Michael. The Animal Protection Association Suit—An Introduction[J]. Natur und Recht 38 (2016):729-733.
[3] Schmidt-Aßmann in Schoch/Schneider/Bier. Administrative Court Law Commentary[J]. 36th Edition, 2023, §80 Rn.147-150.
[4] Kloepfer/Neugärtner. Environmental Law, 5th Edition[Z]. 2023, §8 Rn.118-120.
[5] Kloepfer/Neugärtner. Environmental Law, 5th Edition[Z]. 2023, §8 Rn.115.
[6] Wu Yu. The Evolution of German Environmental Group Litigation and Its Enlightenment to China[J]. Modern Law Science, 2017(2):155-165.
[7] Jürgen Lüthge. The Association Suit in Bremen's Nature Conservation Law[M]. NJW(1980):1037.
[8] Rengeling Hans-Werner. Handbook of European and German Environmental Law: A Systematic Presentation of European Environmental Law with Its Impact on German Law and Legal Policy Perspectives[J]. 2nd Edition, 2003, p.78.
[9] Xie Wei. The Development of German Environmental Group Litigation System and Its Enlightenment[J]. Law Review, 2013(2):110-115.
[10] Marc Pallemaerts. The Aarhus Convention at Ten: Interactions and Tensions between Conventional International Law and EU Environmental Law[J]. Europa Law Press, 2011, p.152.
[11] Bettina Werres. Information and Public Participation in Environmental Matters According to Directives 2003/4/EG and 2003/35/EG[M]. Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt(2005):611-619.
[12] Liu Huiru. Looking at the Europeanization Impact on German Environmental Law from Environmental Impact Assessment and Group Litigation Systems[J]. European and American Studies, 2011(2):623.
[13] Kloepfer/Neugärtner. Environmental Law[J]. 5th Edition, 2023, §8 Rn.487.
[14] Andrea Versteyl. Expansion of Public Participation and Legal Protection in Facility Licensing Law[J]. Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 01(2008):2.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.