Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Research on Tort Liability for Breach of Product Follow-up Observation Obligation

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040414 | Downloads: 4 | Views: 166

Author(s)

Chen Xuanxuan 1

Affiliation(s)

1 China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China

Corresponding Author

Chen Xuanxuan

ABSTRACT

The tort liability for breach of the product follow-up observation obligation should be different from the traditional product liability, and should be positioned as a relatively independent liability, so as to strengthen the producer's initiative to take measures to prevent damage, and realize the dual remedy path of paying equal attention to damage compensation and damage prevention with product liability. In the principle of imputation, in view of the drawbacks of the principle of no fault and the adverse risk of the victim's proof under the principle of fault, the principle of presumption of fault should be adopted. The general defense is applicable to the tort liability for breach of the obligation to observe the follow-up of the product, while the bulk seller theory and development risk defense in the special defense are not applicable. The product follow-up observation obligation only reasonably limits the scope of application of the development risk defense to the product liability exemption.

KEYWORDS

Product Follow-up Observation Obligation, Product Liability, Imputation Principle, Defense

CITE THIS PAPER

Chen Xuanxuan. Research on Tort Liability for Breach of Product Follow-up Observation Obligation. Science of Law Journal (2025) Vol. 4: 87-95. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040414.

REFERENCES

[1] Zhang Yun. Breakthrough and transcendence: Interpretation of the product follow-up observation obligation of Tort Liability Law [J]. Modern Law, 2011,33(05):174-183.
[2] Ma Yide. On the producer's product follow-up security obligations [J]. Law, 2015,(06):44-53.
[3] Wang Zhu, Wang Yichun. On the tort liability for violating the obligation to remedy the universal defects of products after circulation-centered on Article 46 of the Tort Liability Law [J]. Beihang Law Review, 2011,(00):169-182.
[4] Dong Chunhua. After-sales obligations in American product liability law and its enlightenment to China [J]. Oriental Forum, 2012,(02):39-45.
[5] Zhang Yun. Research on the obligation of follow-up observation of products in China [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2020.
[6] Chen Chengtang. After-sales warning obligation-strict liability or negligence liability? -On the imputation principle of Article 10 of the American Restatement of the Third Tort Law: Product Liability Law [J]. Jianghuai Forum, 2003,(03):74-78.
[7] Zhang Yun. Composition and defense of tort liability for violating product follow-up observation obligations[J]. Research on the Rule of Law, 2018, (05): 93-104. Doi: 10.16224/j.cnki.cn33-1343/d.2018.05.009. 
[8] Zhang Minan. Research on the warning obligation of after-sale danger in American tort law [J]. Northern Law, 2008, (06): 41-60. doi: 10.13893/j.cnki.bffx.2008.06.011.
[9] He Chen. Reflection and reconstruction of developing risk defense system in China's product liability law [J]. Legal Science (Journal of northwest university of politics and law), 2016,34 (03): 135-144.doi: 10.16290/j.cnki.1674-5205.2016.03.
[10] Zhang Zaizhi, Amber Chia. On the exclusion of development defects in product liability defense [J]. Politics and Law, 2007,(02):75-80.
[11] Zhou Youjun. On the obligation of product tracking and observation in tort law [J]. Legal Science (Journal of northwest university of politics and law), 2014,32 (04): 127-132. DOI: 10.16290/j.cnki.1674-5205.2014.04.00.
[12] Wei Yanwei. Research on the defense rules of product liability "development risk" in the era of Civil Code [J]. Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, 2023,(06):198-214.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.