The Institutional Dilemma and Improvement of China's Anti-Sanctions Law
DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040418 | Downloads: 14 | Views: 529
Author(s)
Li Xuexiu 1
Affiliation(s)
1 Southwest Petroleum University, No. 8 Xindu Avenue, Chengdu, China
Corresponding Author
Li XuexiuABSTRACT
After the signing of the 25-year strategic cooperation agreement between China and Iran in 2021, especially after the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022, the United States has frequently wielded the stick of sanctions and continuously strengthened containment and suppression of China. Secondary sanctions are based on their dominant position in the international community to increase the cost of a third country's compliance with the sanctions of the sanctioning countries, and to transform their unilateral sanctions into a coercive means of multilateral sanctions. In order to safeguard national interests and national dignity and to express a solemn and just stand against hegemony and power, China has successively promulgated relevant counter-sanctions laws, such as the Measures for Blocking the Improper Extraterritorial Application of Foreign Laws and Measures, the Law on Opposing Foreign Sanctions, the Foreign Relations Law, and the Export Control Law. However, at the same time, because China's legal system on countermeasures is still in the exploratory period, and various systems are still being continuously improved with the development of practice, it is inevitable that there will be problems such as immaturity and lack of practicality, which will have high requirements and strict standards for all parties involved in preventing problems, discovering problems, and solving problems, and China's anti-sanctions legal system will continue to mature and become a powerful tool for protecting national interests and safeguarding national security.
KEYWORDS
Anti-Sanctions, Secondary Sanctions, Legal SystemsCITE THIS PAPER
Li Xuexiu. The Institutional Dilemma and Improvement of China's Anti-Sanctions Law. Science of Law Journal (2025) Vol. 4: 114-128. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.23977/law.2025.040418.
REFERENCES
[1] Du T, Zhou M. Coping with U.S. unilateral economic sanctions: Extraterritorial experiences and China's proposal—from the Blocking Measures to the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law[J]. Wuhan University International Law Review, 2021(5): 1–24.
[2] Ruys T, Ryngaert C. Secondary sanctions: A weapon out of control? The international legality of, and European responses to, U.S. secondary sanctions[J]. The British Yearbook of International Law, 2020: 1–116.
[3] Wang S, Li Q. China's latest legislation against U.S. secondary sanctions and its improvement[J]. International Business Research, 2021(4): 11–29.
[4] Meyer J. A. Second thoughts on secondary sanctions[J]. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 2009, 30(3): 907–960.
[5] Zheng L, Hou Y. Analysis of the illegality of U.S. secondary sanctions against China under the Russia-Ukraine conflict and countermeasures[J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 2023: 83–97.
[6] Reisman W. M., Stevick D. L. The applicability of international law standards to United Nations economic sanctions programmes[J]. European Journal of International Law, 1998, 9(1): 86–141.
[7] Svetlicinii A. China's defense against secondary sanctions: Lessons from the EU blocking statute[J]. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 2022(3): 217–239.
[8] Shang S. The challenges and key frameworks of China's extraterritorial regulatory system: On the Measures for Blocking the Improper Extraterritorial Application of Foreign Laws and Measures[J]. International Law Studies, 2021(2): 63–80.
[9] Liu H. Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law: Fighting fire with fire[J]. Journal of Tianshui Administrative College, 2022, 23(1): 123–128.
[10] Zhou Y. Identification of "Discriminatory Restrictive Measures" under China's Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law[J]. Global Law Review, 2022(2): 162–175.
[11] Clark H. L. Dealing with U.S. extraterritorial sanctions and foreign countermeasures[J]. Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository, 2014(20): 61–96.
[12] Luo G, Liu T. The application rules of China's Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law and its legal adjustment and improvement[J]. Journal of Yunnan Normal University, 2022(2): 120–127.
Downloads: | 13372 |
---|---|
Visits: | 427912 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on History
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting