Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

The Role of Chinese Characters in Maintaining China's Unity throughout History

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/langl.2025.080403 | Downloads: 7 | Views: 277

Author(s)

Shenglin Xiong 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of English Studies, Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an, 710000, China

Corresponding Author

Shenglin Xiong

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the pivotal role of Chinese characters in maintaining China's unity throughout history. It contrasts the stability of logographic writing with the variability of alphabetic systems, highlighting how Chinese characters fostered cultural convergence and national cohesion, contributing to a unified recognition of the Chinese nation. In contrast, the alphabetic system's close connection to speech sounds made it more susceptible to change, leading to linguistic and cultural fragmentation in regions such as the Roman Empire. The enduring stability of Chinese characters has been crucial to China's long periods of unity.

KEYWORDS

Chinese Characters, Logographic Writing, Alphabetic Writing, National Unity

CITE THIS PAPER

Shenglin Xiong, The Role of Chinese Characters in Maintaining China's Unity throughout History. Lecture Notes on Language and Literature (2025) Vol. 8: 12-19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/langl.2025.080403.

REFERENCES

[1] Diamond, J.M. (2017) Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: Norton. 
[2] Yule, G. (2022). The study of language. Cambridge university press.
[3] DeFrancis, J. (2022). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. In Visible Speech. University of Hawaii Press.
[4] Hong Chengyu. (1991). Chinese Characters: A Bond for National Unity. Chinese Character Culture, (4), 45-11.
[5] Zhang Bowei. (2022). A New Study on the Costume Issues in Sino-Korean Written Conversation Records—With a Discussion on Research Methods for East Asian Written Conversations. Journal of Jiangsu Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 48(4), 16–26.
[6] Yu Xiangdong, & Liang Maohua. (2013). Historical Communication Methods Between Chinese and Vietnamese Scholars: Written Conversations. China's Borderland History and Geography Studies, (4), 108–116.
[7] Li, D. C., Aoyama, R., & Wong, T. S. (Eds.). (2022). Brush conversation in the sinographic cosmopolis: interactional cross-border communication using literary Sinitic in early modern East Asia. Routledge.
[8] Ong, W. J., & Hartley, J. (2013). Orality and literacy. Routledge.
[9] Zhou, H. (2021). The Relationship Between Chinese and European Writing Systems Differences and National Unity/Division. Industry and Science Tribune.
[10] Joseph, J. E. (2006). Language and politics. Edinburgh University Press.
[11] Leonhardt, J. (2013). Latin: Story of a world language. Harvard University Press.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.