Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Insufficient construction of administrative punishment power at the grassroots level and countermeasures

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/socsam.2024.050106 | Downloads: 6 | Views: 152

Author(s)

Run Wang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Faculty of Political Science and Law, Tibet University, Lhasa, China

Corresponding Author

Run Wang

ABSTRACT

Empowering grassroots society with the right to impose administrative penalties is a pioneering initiative, but it is not without its own contention. Based on the provisions of Article 24 of the Administrative Punishment Law, what needs to be delegated is the right to impose administrative that is urgently needed at the grassroots level. The literal meaning of urgency is not difficult to understand, and it is interpreted as the need to wait to the point that it is difficult to wait. Usually, it is used where the economically developed on towns and streets. However, it is lacking for pay attention to social stability, ecological protection and border security, in poor towns and streets. I think we should also actively consider the decentralization of administrative punishment power. If only from the degree of economic development to seek the recipient of decentralization, the author believes that in Article 24 of the "Administrative Punishment Law" grassroots urgent need to express not only the urgent need of economically developed towns and streets. It also should be considered in the field of modern national system construction under the actual situation of different towns and streets.

KEYWORDS

The right to impose administrative penalties; Institutional construction; Township government and sub-district office

CITE THIS PAPER

Run Wang, Insufficient construction of administrative punishment power at the grassroots level and countermeasures. Social Security and Administration Management (2024) Vol. 5: 45-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/socsam.2024.050106.

REFERENCES

[1] Haihua Huang. System Development of the New Administrative Penalty Law [J].China Law Review, 2021(03): 48-61.
[2] Yang Zhao. Legal Interpretation and Institutional Construction of Township Streets with Decentralization of Administrative Punishment Power [J]. Journal of the Party School of Shanxi Provincial Committee of the Communist Party of China, 2023, 46(03):83-89.
[3] Jianjun Lv, Baifen Cheng. Institutional Causes and Organizational Adjustment of Unbalanced Powerand Responsibility at Community Level [J].Seeking Truth, 2021(04):28-41.
[4] Guohua Jiang, Yubo Lu. Legislative Response to the Transformation for Governance system of Chinese Governments [J]. Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social. Sciences), 2021, 41. (06):103-112.
[5] Yuhuan. Mo. Analysis and Construction of Administrative Law of Administrative Powers [J] Chongqing. Social. Sciences, 2004(01):74-81.
[6] Baifeng Chen. Disposition of the Law Enforcement Power of the Township: Situation and Reform[J]. Quest, 2020(01): 9.
[7] Yunhao Zhang. The Remolding of Administrative Integration From the Respective Functionalism and. Its. Limits [J]. Finance and Economics. Law, 2020(01):115-131.
[8] Dan Yang. Value and the Path of Rule of Law Endowed to the Township Government with Administrative. Punishment. Power. [J]Journal of Sichuan. Normal. University (Social. Sciences), 2021, 48(06):82-90.
[9] Xianxiang Zou. The Construction of China's South Asia Corridor and the Strategy of Prospering Border Areas and Enriching the People in the New World View [J]. Development Forum, 2021(03):17-22.

Downloads: 2529
Visits: 67386

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.