Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Moderating Role of Analyst Attention and Internal Control on the Relationship of Corporate ESG Performance and Dividend Smoothing

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/acccm.2024.060112 | Downloads: 6 | Views: 185

Author(s)

Nan Meng 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Business, International Studies University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710128, China

Corresponding Author

Nan Meng

ABSTRACT

Based on principal-agent theory and signal transmission theory, this paper explores two possible paths through which corporate ESG performance affects dividend smoothing. Taking Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2013 to 2022 as the research object, the empirical study finds that corporate ESG performance can significantly improve dividend smoothing, i.e., corporate ESG performance has a facilitating effect on dividend smoothing. This research conclusion still holds after the robustness test, i.e., replacing the dividend smoothing measure and regression model; and the endogeneity test, using the PSM method. Further analysis reveals that the contribution of corporate ESG performance to dividend smoothing is more pronounced when the firms are in an environment with stronger internal control and higher analyst attention. The findings of this research not only expand the research boundaries of principal-agent theory and signaling theory applied to dividend policy, but also enrich the economic consequences of corporate ESG performance, which can provide certain empirical evidence for the healthy and orderly development of China's capital market.

KEYWORDS

Dividend Smoothing, ESG Performance, Internal Control, Analyst Attention

CITE THIS PAPER

Nan Meng, Moderating Role of Analyst Attention and Internal Control on the Relationship of Corporate ESG Performance and Dividend Smoothing. Accounting and Corporate Management (2024) Vol. 6: 86-92. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/acccm.2024.060112.

REFERENCES

[1] Brogi M, Lagasio V. Environmental, social, and governance and company profitability: are financial intermediaries different? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2018, 26(3): 576-587.
[2] Duque G E, Aguilera C J. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 2021, 168(2): 315-334.
[3] Azmi W, Hassan M K, Houston R, Karim M S.ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies. International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2021, 70: 101277.
[4] Shanaev S, Ghimire B. When ESG meets AAA: The effect of ESG rating changes on stock returns. Finance Research Letters, 2022, 46: 102302.
[5] Serafeim G, Yoon A. Stock price reactions to ESG news: The role of ESG ratings and disagreement. Review of Accounting Studies, 2022, 1-31.
[6] Chouaibi S, Chouaibi J, Rossi M. ESG and Corporate Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation: UK Common Law Versus Germany Civil Law. EuroMed Journal of Business, 2022, 17(1): 46-71.
[7] Diaz A, Escribano A. Sustainability premium in energy bonds. Energy Economics, 2021, (95): 105113.
[8] Gao J. Y., Chu D. X., Lian Y. H., Zheng J. Can ESG performance improve corporate investment efficiency. Securities Market Herald, 2021, (11): 24-34+72.
[9] Barth F, Hübel B, Scholz H. ESG and corporate credit spreads.The Journal of Risk Finance, 2022.
[10] Zhou B, Lv J, Lv P. Research on the technological innovation promotion effect of improved corporate ESG performance. Western Forum, 2023, 33(06): 81-95.
[11] Chen Y L, Jiang Y F, Xin Z P. Shareholding Concentration and Dividend Smoothing-Analyses and Tests Based on the Controlling Shareholder Hollowing Out Hypothesis. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2020, 42(09): 85-98.
[12] Chen M Q, Liu X, Yao M, etc. Re-examination of the neutral supervision of dividends of listed companies in China-based on the perspective of unstable motivation of dividends. Financial Forum, 2019, 24 (07): 60-70.
[13] Liu B, Lu J R, Ju T. Formalism or Substantivism: A Study of Green Innovation under Soft Regulation of ESG Ratings. Nankai Management Review: 2022, 1-24.
[14] Pedersen L H, Fitzgibbons S, Pomorski L. Responsible investing: The ESG efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 2021, 142(2): 572-597.
[15] Eccles R G, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. The impact of corporate sustainability on organisational processes and performance. Management Science, 2014, 60 (11): 2835-2857.
[16] Miller M, Rock K. Dividend policy under asymmetric information. Journal of Finance, 1985, 40: 1031-1051.
[17] Guttman I, Kadan O, Kandel E. Dividend stickiness and strategic pooling. Review of Financial Studies, 2010, 23: 4455-4495.
[18] Luo K, Wu S. Corporate sustainability and analysts' earnings forecast accuracy: evidence from environmental, social and governance ratings. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2022, 29(5): 1465-1481.
[19] Brooks C, Oikonomou I. The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on Firm Value: a review of the literature in accounting and finance. British Accounting Review, 2018, 50(1): 1-15.
[20] Raghunandan A, Rajgopal S. Do ESG Funds Make Stakeholder-Friendly Investments? Review of Accounting Studies, 2022, 27(3): 822-863.
[21] Li Q F, Liu H W. Are cash dividends sticky in China?—Empirical Evidence from Chinese A-share Listed Companies. Dongyue Discussion Series, 2021, 42(06): 36-45.

Downloads: 13500
Visits: 181939

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.