The Influence of Social Networking Self-Efficacy on Friendship Quality: A Moderated Mediation Model
DOI: 10.23977/appep.2024.050624 | Downloads: 27 | Views: 853
Author(s)
Yuqi Zhang 1, Yuanyuan Tan 1
Affiliation(s)
1 Department of Applied Psychology, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442000, China
Corresponding Author
Yuanyuan TanABSTRACT
The quality of friendship is a key indicator in personal relationships. Investigating new friendship patterns, particularly individual cognitive and behavioral patterns in the digital age, this study administered the social networking self-efficacy scale, Online communication Motivation Scale, Friendship Quality Scale, and the Internet Self-Representation Scale to 935 college students. Findings indicated that social networking self-efficacy positively predicts friendship quality. Additionally, online communication motivation partially mediated the relationship between social networking self-efficacy and friendship quality. Moreover, online Self-Disclosure moderated the initial stage of this mediation model. These results aim to help students shape a healthy perspective on friendships, utilize online resources for interpersonal interactions, and provide a theoretical foundation for mental health education in academic institutions.
KEYWORDS
College students; Social networking self-efficacy; Friendship quality; Online communication motivation; Online self-disclosureCITE THIS PAPER
Yuqi Zhang, Yuanyuan Tan, The Influence of Social Networking Self-Efficacy on Friendship Quality: A Moderated Mediation Model. Applied & Educational Psychology (2024) Vol. 5: 158-166. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/appep.2024.050624.
REFERENCES
[1] Hu Dong, Guo Ying. Relationship between interpersonal communication on the mobile social networks and subjective well-being in college student: A moderated mediation model [J]. China Journal of Health Psychology, 2021, 29(9): 1376-1381.
[2] Fatkin, J. M. 'Pro' social media: Using key social psychological theories to increase prosocial engagement on social media sites[D]. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University, 2015.
[3] Jin Shenghua, Yu Quanlei, Guo Yafei, Zhang Lin, Zhu Yijie, Wu Gong'an. The Influence of Juvenile Preference for Online Social Interaction on Internet Addiction: The Moderating Effect of the family social economic statue [J]. Psychological Science, 2017, 40(4), 885-891.
[4] Wang Wei, Wang Xingchao, Lei Ling, Fu Xiaojie. How does mobile social media use affect the friendship quality of adolescents: The mediating role of online social support and online self-disclosure [J]. Psychological Science, 2017, 40(4), 870–877.
[5] Li Xiaoran. The Relationship between College Students' Proactive Social Network Site Use and Friendship Quality: The Mediating Role of Online Positive Feedback and Social Self-efficacy [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2024, 32(2), 446-450.
[6] Zou Hong, Zhou Hui, Zhou Yan. The Relationship among Middle School Students' Friendship, Friendship Quality, and Peer Acceptance [J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), 1998, (1), 43-50.
[7] Hu Hongmei. Research on the Relationship and Intervention of High School Students' Friendship Quality, Positive Psychological Capital, and Self-harmony [D]. Yunnan Normal University, 2023.
[8] Peng Yang, Pan Haiyun. Effect of Parent-child Attachment and Friendship Quality on Self-concept of Left-behind Children [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2023, 31(1), 218-221.
[9] Kingery JN, Erdley CA, Marshall KC. Peer acceptance and friendship as predictors of early adolescents' adjustment across the middle school transition [J]. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 2011, 57(3), 215-243.
[10] Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change[J]. Advances in Behavior Research & Therapy, 1977, 1(4), 139–161.
[11] Smith H M, Betz N E. Development and validation of a scale of perceived social self-efficacy[J]. Journal of career assessment, 2000, 8(3): 283-301.
[12] Liu X, LaRose R. Does using the Internet make people more satisfied with their lives? The effects of the Internet on college students' school life satisfaction[J]. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008, 11(3): 310-320.
[13] Jang J Y, Kim Y C. The effects of parent–child communication patterns on children's interactive communication in online communities: focusing on social self-efficacy and unwillingness to communicate as mediating factors[J]. Asian Journal of Communication, 2012, 22(5): 493-505.
[14] Yang Xiaoxiao. Preliminary study on college students’ social networking self-efficacy: questionnaire and actuality [D], Southwest University, 2016.
[15] Yan D, Yang X, Zhang H. Personality traits, self-efficacy, and friendship establishment: Group characteristics and network clustering of college students’ friendships[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13, 1-17.
[16] Spitzberg B H. Preliminary development of a model and measure of computer-mediated communication (CMC) competence [J]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2006, 11(2): 629-666.
[17] Zhao Huanhuan, Zhang Heyun. College students’ Internet communication motivation and Internet altruistic behavior: the mediating effects of online interpersonal trust [J]. Psychological Research, 2013, 6(6), 92-96.
[18] Schunk D H, DiBenedetto M K. Self-efficacy and human motivation[M]. Advances in motivation science. Elsevier, 2021, 8: 153-179.
[19] Jourard S.M, & Lasakow P. Some factors in self-disclosure[J]. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958, 56, 91-98.
[20] Xie Xiaochun, Sun Xiaojun, Zhou Zongkui. The type, function and influencing factors of online self-disclosure[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2), 272–281.
[21] Sun Xiaojun, Chai Huanyou, Niu Gengfeng, Cui Xixiang, Lian Shuai, Tian Yuan. The effect of self-disclosure on social networking site on adolescents’ loneliness: a moderated mediation model[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(4), 477-486.
[22] Chen Na. Research on the Relationship among College Students' Shyness, Self-efficacy, and Self-disclosure [J]. Theoretical Research, 2020, 812-813.
[23] Michael D. Siciliano. It’s the Quality not the Quantity of Ties that Matter: Social Networks and Self-Efficacy Beliefs [J]. American Educational Research Journal, 2016, 1-45.
[24] Jennifer A. H. Becker & Glen H. Stamp. Impression Management in Chat Rooms: A Grounded Theory Model[J]. Communication Studies, 2005, 56(3), 243-260.
[25] Park, N., Jin, B., & Jin, S. A. A. Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27(5), 1974-1983.
[26] Cui Xixiang, Sun Xiaojun, Niu Gengfeng. The effect of self-presentation in online social networking sites on adolescents' friendship quality: the mediating role of positive feedback[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(3), 294-300.
[27] Zhang Feng, Shen Mowei, Xu Mei, Zhu Haiyan, Zhou Ning. A Structural Equation Modeling of Motives, Behaviors of Internet Use and Related Social-Psychological Health [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2006, 38(3), 407-413.
[28] Cao Yu. A research on relationships among online self-disclosure, perceived social support and loneliness [D], Guangxi Normal University, 2014.
[29] Zou Hong, Zhou Hui, Zhou Yan. The Relationship among Middle School Students' Friendship, Friendship Quality, and Peer Acceptance [J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), 1998, (1), 43-50.
[30] Sun Xiaojuan, Li Mei, Zhao Yuetong, Zhang Xiangkui, Deng Xiaoping, Qu Pu. Normative Beliefs About Aggression on Bullying: The Mediating Effect of the Moral Disengagement[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2019, 27(6). 1246-1250.
[31] Wang Wei, Lei Ling, Wang Xingchao. The Relationship of College Students' Proactive Personality and Academic Performance: The Mediating Roles of Academic Self-efficacy and Academic Adjustment [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(5), 579-586.
[32] Lian Shuai, Tian Yuan, Sun Xiaojun, Zhang Chenyan. The Effect of Adolescents' Active Social Network Sites Use on Friendship Quality: The Chain Mediating Role of Positive Feedback and Uncertainty[J]. Studies of psychology and behavior, 2017, 15(2), 197-204.
Downloads: | 15448 |
---|---|
Visits: | 517292 |