Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Institutional Evolution of China's Rural Land Property Rights and Sharecropping Contracts

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/agrfem.2025.080108 | Downloads: 7 | Views: 249

Author(s)

Ziyu Wu 1, Ping Yu 1, Yixuan Guo 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Swinburne College, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Jinan, China

Corresponding Author

Ping Yu

ABSTRACT

The agricultural technological progress, along with agricultural mechanization and modernization, has given rise to the urgent requirement for large-scale farming. However, the contradictions between this requirement with the fragmented farmland and single-family production are becoming increasingly prominent. The confirmation of rural land contracting right and land transfer have provided institutional conveniences for large-scale farming. Nevertheless, the issue of "who will engage in farming ", that is, the cultivation of new-type agricultural business entities, is an urgent problem that needs to be addressed immediately. Given the inherent deficiencies of Chinese farmers in terms of funds, technology, management, and risk-bearing capacities, a"farmers + Agribusiness" sharecropping model is proposed, where both parties jointly assume the functions of a family farm.

KEYWORDS

New Agricultural Business Entities; Rural Land Property Rights; Sharecropping Contracts; Family Farms

CITE THIS PAPER

Ziyu Wu, Ping Yu, Yixuan Guo, Institutional Evolution of China's Rural Land Property Rights and Sharecropping Contracts. Agricultural & Forestry Economics and Management (2025) Vol. 8: 55-60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/agrfem.2025.080108.

REFERENCES

[1] Steven N.S. Cheung. The Theory of Tenant farmers [M]. Beijing: CITIC Press, 2010, (11):33-42
[2] Joseph E. Joseph E. Stiglitz. Incentives and Risk sharing in Sharecropping[J].Review of Economic studies, 1974,41(2):219-255.
[3] Avishay Braverman , Joseph E. Stiglitz. Cost-sharing Arrangements under Sharecropping: Moral Hazard, Incentive Flexibility, and Risk[J]. American Agricultural Economics s Association , 19 86 , 68 ( 3): 642- 652 . 
[4] Yoram Barzel. Economic Analysis of Property Rights[M]. Press of Cambridge, 1989:10-25 .
[5] Wan Jianghong, Yang Liu. Supplement and Compensation: A Dual-Layer Mechanism of Contract Governance through Contracts—An Analysis Based on Agricultural Operation Contracts of Chuxiang Family Farm in Central Hubei [J]. China Rural Survey, 2018, (01): 53-69.
[6] Lei Lixia, Zh ang Yingliang. Village-Enterprise Contract Choice under the Context of Capital xiaxiang: Fixed Lease Contracts versus Share Contracts [J]. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 49(06): 172-184. 
[7] Yan Jinming, Guo Donglin, Xia Fangzhou. "Historical Logic, Theoretical Logic and Practical Logic of Land System Change in the Centenary of China" [J]. Management World, 2021,37(07):19-31+2.
[8] Yu Mingxuan, Gu Yujia, Li Ruizhe. The people-centered land policy: a century of evolution and development [J]. Management World, 2021,37(04):24-35.
[9] Douglas W. Douglas W. Allen, Dean Lueck. The Nature of the Farm: Contracts, Risk, and Organization in Agriculture[M].MIT Press, 2002.

Downloads: 5708
Visits: 187510

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.