The Inevitable Fate and Implications of the Integrated Judicial-Administrative System—With a Historical Review of the Research on the Operation of China's Feudal Judicial-Administrative System
DOI: 10.23977/history.2025.070117 | Downloads: 8 | Views: 119
Author(s)
Xingfei Zhao 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Marxist Studies, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
Corresponding Author
Xingfei ZhaoABSTRACT
The rise and fall of dynasties within China's ancient feudal system consistently occurred within a political framework characterized by the integration of judicial and administrative functions. The culmination of Professor Liu Changjiang's National Social Science Fund Project for the Western Region—Research on the Operation of China's Feudal Judicial-Administrative System—represents a significant attempt to examine this historical phenomenon.This work is characterized by three salient features: a 'grand narrative with a clear structure,' 'distinct themes and appropriate methodology,' and 'transcending historical boundaries while reflecting contemporary realities.' However, the study has certain limitations. It omits coverage of the Wei-Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, as well as the Yuan Dynasty, consequently creating a sense of 'period discontinuity.' Furthermore, its chronological organization hinders in-depth thematic discussion."Despite these limitations, the work remains a substantial contribution to the analysis of China's feudal judicial-administrative system, offering readers profound insights. These include the realization that "the nature of the political system determines the status and character of the law," that "power must be constrained and supervised to serve the greater good," and that "only by establishing a socialist democratic rule of law can we escape the 'historical cycle' of fate.
KEYWORDS
Legal History; Rule of Law; Judicial-Administrative SystemCITE THIS PAPER
Xingfei Zhao, The Inevitable Fate and Implications of the Integrated Judicial-Administrative System—With a Historical Review of the Research on the Operation of China's Feudal Judicial-Administrative System. Lecture Notes on History (2025) Vol. 7: 111-117. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/history.2025.070117.
REFERENCES
[1] Bai Gang. A General History of China's Political Systems [M]. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1996.
[2] Aristotle. Wu Shoupeng. Politics [M]. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2008.
[3] Liu Changjiang, et al. Research on the Operation of China's Feudal Judicial Administration System [M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2014.
[4] [France]Montesquieu. Zhang Yanshen. The Spirit of Laws (Volume 1) [M]. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2005.
[5] Wu Jianhua, Luo Bu. The Alienation and Constraints of Public Power [J]. Philosophical Research, 2003, (9).
[6] Hamilton, et al. (U.S.). Cheng Fengru, et al. (Trans.). The Federalist Papers [M]. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2007.
[7] Marx and Engels Collected Works: Volume 1 [M]. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1956.
[8] [France] Tocqueville, Dong Guoliang. Democracy in America [M]. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2002.
[9] Zhang Fengyang. Historical Narratives of the Republican Tradition [J]. Social Sciences in China, 2008, (4).
[10] Qiu Yongming. History of Ancient Chinese Supervisory Systems [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2006.
[11] Locke, John. (Translated by Ye Qifang and Qu Junnong). Two Treatises of Government (Part II). Beijing: Commercial Press, 2007.
| Downloads: | 2254 |
|---|---|
| Visits: | 135141 |
Sponsors, Associates, and Links
-
Journal of Language Testing & Assessment
-
Information and Knowledge Management
-
Military and Armament Science
-
Media and Communication Research
-
Journal of Human Movement Science
-
Art and Performance Letters
-
Lecture Notes on Language and Literature
-
Philosophy Journal
-
Science of Law Journal
-
Journal of Political Science Research
-
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
-
Advances in Broadcasting

Download as PDF