Pathways and Quality Enhancement of Integrating Practical Teaching into Engineering Education: A Case Study of the Automotive Power Battery Technology Course
DOI: 10.23977/appep.2026.070112 | Downloads: 3 | Views: 80
Author(s)
Kai Shen 1, Tao Sun 1, Dongxu Guo 1, Changyong Jin 1, Xin Lai 1, Yuejiu Zheng 1
Affiliation(s)
1 School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
Corresponding Author
Yuejiu ZhengABSTRACT
In the context of the deep advancement of the New Engineering initiative and the increasing alignment between industrial demands and educational provision, engineering education in universities is facing several prominent challenges. These include the disconnection between theory and practice, the abstract and monotonous nature of specialized knowledge, insufficient student learning motivation, and weak engineering competencies, all of which significantly constrain educational quality and the effectiveness of talent cultivation. As a critical bridge linking theoretical knowledge with industrial practice, practical teaching plays a key role in addressing these issues. Its deep integration throughout the entire engineering education process can effectively overcome the limitations of traditional teaching approaches, enhance students’ practical skills, engineering thinking, and innovative capabilities, and ultimately promote the continuous improvement of educational quality. Drawing on engineering education practices at the University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, this study takes the course Automotive Power Battery Technology as a case study. It analyses the current status and existing problems in integrating practical teaching into university engineering education, explores feasible integration pathways and instructional design methods, and, based on specific practical cases and outcome data, proposes optimization strategies. The study aims to provide both theoretical insights and practical references for improving the quality of engineering education and cultivating outstanding engineering talents.
KEYWORDS
Practical Teaching; Engineering Education; Education Quality; Power Battery Technology; Instructional Design; Industry-Academia IntegrationCITE THIS PAPER
Kai Shen, Tao Sun, Dongxu Guo, Changyong Jin, Xin Lai, Yuejiu Zheng. Pathways and Quality Enhancement of Integrating Practical Teaching into Engineering Education: A Case Study of the Automotive Power Battery Technology Course. Applied & Educational Psychology (2026). Vol. 7, No.1, 104-111. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/appep.2026.070112.
REFERENCES
[1] G. Guo, Enhancing project-based manufacturing education with integrated engineering software tools, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 33, no. 1, e70012, 2025, doi: 10.1002/cae.70012.
[2] Y. Kweon and J. Park, Using the design-thinking method to develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning, Nurse Education Today, vol. 122, 105717, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105717.
[3] W. A. Friess and A. J. Goupee, Using continuous peer evaluation in team-based engineering capstone projects: A case study, IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 185–192, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TE.2020.2971592.
[4] T. Hsiao, Y. Chuang, T. Chen, et al., Students’ performances in computer programming of higher education for sustainable development: The effects of a peer-evaluation system, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, 887946, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887946.
[5] S. Lerchenfeldt, S. Kamel-ElSayed, G. Patino, et al., A qualitative analysis on the effectiveness of peer feedback in team-based learning, Medical Science Educator, vol. 33, pp. 123–131, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01650-0.
[6] C. Hundhausen, P. Conrad, and O. Adesope, Combining GitHub, chat, and peer evaluation data to assess individual contributions to team software development projects, ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 23, no. 3, Article 21, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3583565.
[7] T. Hsiao et al., The effectiveness of peer evaluation in team-based learning in computer programming, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 114, no. 7, pp. 1436–1452, 2022, doi: 10.1037/edu0000705.
[8] Shanghai University of Science and Technology, Automotive power battery course reform: Application and challenges of project-based learning mode, Shanghai, China, 2025.
[9] S. Lerchenfeldt et al., The role of peer feedback in project-based learning, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 456–478, 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20510.
[10] S. Lerchenfeldt et al., Project-based learning in engineering: A case study, IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 487–495, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TE.2023.3284835.
[11] C. Ye, F. Fang, N. Zhang, L. Wang, and H. Wan, System design of intelligent logistics training base based on information technology integration: Taking the Mingkanghui industry-education integration training base as an example, Journal of Cases on Information Technology, vol. 28, no. 1, 2026, doi: 10.4018/JCIT.398563.
| Downloads: | 21355 |
|---|---|
| Visits: | 898548 |

Download as PDF



