Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

A Real-Time Reliability Assessment Method for Urban Bridge Erecting Machines Based on a Three-State Noisy-OR Bayesian Network and XGBoost Evidence Fusion

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/jceup.2026.080202 | Downloads: 0 | Views: 25

Author(s)

Rui Guo 1

Affiliation(s)

1 China Academy of Machinery Science and Technology Group, Beijing, China

Corresponding Author

Rui Guo

ABSTRACT

The hoisting trolley system of an urban bridge erecting machine is a strongly coupled electro-mechanical-hydraulic subsystem with very few field samples for its critical components. In real-time reliability assessment, two issues are normally treated separately: low-level multi-source condition monitoring and system-level probabilistic reasoning. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a real-time reliability assessment method based on a three-state Noisy-OR Bayesian network (BN) coupled with XGBoost evidence fusion. First, the state space of the bottom-layer Bayesian network nodes is extended from the conventional Normal/Failed binary form to a Normal/Degraded/ Failed three-state form, with a hybrid modelling strategy in which mechanical/hydraulic components are described by three states and electrical/logical components remain binary. Second, a simplified three-state Noisy-OR risk-propagation rule is adopted to aggregate the Normal, Degraded and Failed probabilities of bottom-layer nodes upward into system-level state probabilities. Finally, XGBoost is used to convert multi-source monitoring features into an initial SoftMax three-class probability vector; after soft-evidence stabilization, the corresponding prototype evidence vector is injected into the leaf nodes of the Bayesian network, closing the loop from data perception to topological reasoning. Taking a hoisting-trolley fault-diagnosis test platform as the case study, 200 days of operating data were obtained from its 3-D model and the corresponding scaled test rig. Results show that the proposed framework triggers a yellow alarm on day 74, i.e. 25 days after the first soft-fault injection and 14 days after the second. After excluding the interpretable ∼10-day con- formation delay introduced by the soft-evidence stabilization module, the effective risk-response time is reduced to several days, and the framework escalates to a red alarm on day 78, providing a quantitative "when-to-intervene" decision basis for on-site predictive maintenance.

KEYWORDS

Urban bridge erecting machine; Bayesian network; three-state Noisy-OR; XGBoost; Real-time reliability assessment

CITE THIS PAPER

Rui Guo. A Real-Time Reliability Assessment Method for Urban Bridge Erecting Machines Based on a Three-State Noisy-OR Bayesian Network and XGBoost Evidence Fusion. Journal of Civil Engineering and Urban Planning (2026). Vol. 8, No.2, 15-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/jceup.2026.080202.

REFERENCES

[1] XU J, LI Z, WANG H, et al. Construction safety influencing factor analysis of bridge-erecting machines based on structural equation modeling[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(2).
[2] KHALEGHI B, KHAMIS A, KARRAY F O, et al. Multisensor data fusion: A review of the state-ofthe-art[J]. Information Fusion, 2013, 14(1):28-44.
[3] CHEN T, GUESTRIN C. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System[C]//Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2016:785794.
[4] ZHANG D, QIAN L, MAO B, et al. A Data-Driven Design for Fault Detection of Wind Turbines Using Random Forests and XGBoost[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6:21020-21031.
[5] TRIZOGLOU P, LIU X, LIN Z. Fault detection by an ensemble framework of Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) in the operation of offshore wind turbines[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 179: 945-962.
[6] WEBER P, MEDINA-OLIVA G, SIMON C, et al. Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2010, 25(4):671-682.
[7] BOUDALI H, DUGAN J B. A continuous-time Bayesian network reliability modeling, and analysis framework[J]. IEEE transactions on reliability, 2006, 55(1):86-97.
[8] CAI B, HUANG L, XIE M. Bayesian Networks in Fault Diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2017, 13(5):2227-2240.
[9] LANGSETH H, PORTINALE L. Bayesian networks in reliability[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92(1):92-108.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.