Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Mechanism and Optimization Path of Primary and Secondary School Teachers' Selection of Digital Resources Based on ISM

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/curtm.2026.090304 | Downloads: 0 | Views: 32

Author(s)

Wenna Jia 1

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Information, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan, China

Corresponding Author

Wenna Jia

ABSTRACT

The selection of digital educational resources by primary and secondary school teachers is a key link in improving teaching quality and advancing educational informatization. Based on technology adoption theories, this study proposes a framework of influencing factors: Technology–Organization–Environment–Data–Individual Perceptual Judgment. Core constructs of relevant theories are synthesized to initially construct an influencing factor system. Two rounds of expert consultation are conducted to screen and validate 22 operational influencing factors. An Interpretive Structural Model (ISM) is employed to develop a hierarchical structure map that presents the hierarchical relationships and directed associations among factors. Based on the action paths identified from the hierarchical model, complex relationships are transformed into actionable strategies to optimize teachers' selection behavior of digital educational resources.

KEYWORDS

Primary and Secondary School Teachers; Digital Educational Resources; Interpretive Structural Modeling

CITE THIS PAPER

Wenna Jia. Mechanism and Optimization Path of Primary and Secondary School Teachers' Selection of Digital Resources Based on ISM. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2026). Vol. 9, No. 3, 23-31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2026.090304.

REFERENCES

[1] Central People's Government and State Council of the People's Republic of China. Issuance of China Education Modernization 2035[N]. People's Daily, 2019-02-24(001).
[2] Zhu, Z.T. and Peng, H.C. (2020) Practical paths of technology-enabled smart education. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 10, 1-8.
[3] Valverde-Berrocoso J, Acevedo-Borrega J, Cerezo-Pizarro M. Educational technology and student performance: A systematic review[C]//Frontiers in Education. Frontiers Media SA, 2022, 7: 916502.
[4] Howard, S.K., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., et al. Ready, Set, Go! Profiling Teachers' Readiness for Online Teaching in Secondary Education [J]. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 2021, 30(1): 141–158.
[5] Wang, J.X., Zhou, T., Chen, Z.Q., et al. (2022) New trends and technical analysis influencing the digital transformation of global higher education. China Education Informatization, 28(9), 18-32.
[6] Cao, H.J. and Hou, T.T. (2021) How blockchain technology empowers government digital transformation: A new theoretical analysis framework. Theoretical Exploration, 6, 147-153.
[7] SAC/TC 28. Information Technology—Data Quality Evaluation Indicators: GB/T 36344-2018 [S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2018.
[8] Editorial Department of China Information Security. Excerpt from Big Data Security Standardization White Paper (2017) [J]. China Information Security, 2017(5): 76–79
[9] Kendall M G, Babington S B. " The Problem of m Rankings". The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 10 (3): 275-287[EB/OL].(1939).

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.