Author(s)

Peilong Ding ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Office of Academic Affairs, Chuzhou City Vocational College, Chuzhou, China

Corresponding Author

Peilong Ding

ABSTRACT

With the comprehensive promotion of curriculum Ideological and Political Education construction, university English courses urgently need to verify the educational effectiveness through empirical methods. This study implements teaching reform based on the five-element integrated concept of "teacher - student - textbook - teaching method - evaluation", and constructs an effectiveness evaluation system based on the CIPP model. The study adopts a quasi-experimental design method and conducts expert evaluation and comparison of four-level grades for 200 students. The results show that the comprehensive score of experts reaches 94.8 points, and the four-level grades of the reform class are 503.27 ± 32.19, which are superior to those of the ordinary class (482.65 ± 34.21) (p < 0.001), and the proportion of high scores has increased from 38.00% to 55.00%. The research indicates that the curriculum Ideological and Political Education reform of university English can effectively improve teaching quality and students' comprehensive abilities, aiming to provide empirical support and practical references for the evaluation of curriculum Ideological and Political Education effectiveness.

KEYWORDS

University English; Curriculum Ideological and Political Education; CIPP Evaluation Model; Effectiveness Evaluation

CITE THIS PAPER

Peilong Ding. Research on the Effectiveness of Ideological and Political Education in University English Curriculum Teaching Reform Based on the CIPP Evaluation Model. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2026). Vol. 9, No. 3, 50-59. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2026.090307.

REFERENCES

[1] STUFFLEBEAM D L. The CIPP model for evaluation[M]//KELLAGHAN T, STUFFLEBEAM D L, WINGATE L A. International handbook of educational evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer, 2003: 31-62.
[2] STUFFLEBEAM D L, SHINKFIELD A J. Evaluation theory, models, and applications[M]. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2007.
[3] SURYANTO A, ARIFIN Z, ANWAR K. Evaluation of blended learning implementation in higher education using CIPP model[J]. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2021, 16(6): 77-91.
[4] KODIR A, RAHMAN A, WIDIASTUTI. Evaluating remote learning policy during COVID-19 pandemic: A CIPP model approach[J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2022, 27(3): 3765-3784.
[5] AGUS A, JULIADHARMA M, DJAMALUDDIN M. Application of the CIPP model in evaluation of the inclusive education curriculum in Madrasah Aliyah[J]. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2023, 8(1): 31-50.
[6] LEPAGE P, AKAR E, TEMLI Y, et al. Comparing teachers' strategies for moral education evaluation across cultural contexts[J]. International Journal of Educational Development, 2019, 68: 102-112.
[7] ASIF T, MALIK M H, HUSSAIN A, et al. Developing an evaluation model for values education: A mixed-methods approach[J]. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2020, 67: 100923.
[8] GUO X H. An empirical exploration of college English blended teaching mode reform based on OBE concept[C]//Proceedings of the 2025 4th International Conference on Science Education and Art Appreciation (SEAA 2025). Paris: Atlantis Press, 2025: 126014439.
[9] ZHANG G, ZELLER N, GRIFFITH R, et al. Using the context, input, process and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation and assessment of service-learning[J]. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 2011, 15(4): 57-79.
[10] BREWER C A, GRIFFITH B. The evaluation of a blended faculty development course using the CIPP framework[J]. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2019, 16(3): 1-15.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education