Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Synergistic Coupling Effects between Rural PPP Implementation and Local Corporate Assistance: Evidence from Matched County-Level Cross Samples in Guangdong

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/acccm.2026.080117 | Downloads: 0 | Views: 16

Author(s)

Jyh-Harng Shyng 1

Affiliation(s)

1 Life Sciences College, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, China

Corresponding Author

Jyh-Harng Shyng

ABSTRACT

Rural PPP infrastructure and the "Thousands of Enterprises Assist Thousands of Towns" corporate assistance policy are two core public-private governance tools for China's rural revitalization. Existing literature studies PPP performance and corporate rural support separately, ignoring their interactive synergies within the same county governance system. This paper constructs two subsystems: rural PPP comprehensive performance subsystem and local enterprise ESG assistance subsystem. Based on cross matching of 58 counties with rural PPP projects and corresponding 170 paired assistance enterprises in Guangdong Province, this paper adopts entropy weight method to calculate subsystem composite scores, applies coupling coordination degree (CCD) model to measure county-level synergistic coupling levels, and further uses grouped regression to identify heterogeneous driving factors of coupling efficiency across county economic tiers and project types. The results show that most sample counties stay in moderate coupling stage; counties with wetland cultural PPP and manufacturing enterprise groups own significantly higher coordination degree; county fiscal capacity, public participation governance and industrial matching degree are core positive driving factors, while single capital-oriented assistance and sanitation PPP restrict coupling promotion. This study innovatively matches two independent micro datasets into county-level cross-section samples, supplements the interactive governance logic of dual public-private tools, and provides classified collaborative optimization paths for county rural revitalization governance.

KEYWORDS

Government-Enterprise Linkage; Rural PPP; Thousands of Enterprises Assist Thousands of Towns; Coupling Coordination Model; County Governance; ESG

CITE THIS PAPER

Jyh-Harng Shyng. Synergistic Coupling Effects between Rural PPP Implementation and Local Corporate Assistance: Evidence from Matched County-Level Cross Samples in Guangdong. Accounting and Corporate Management (2026). Vol. 8, No. 1, 137-143. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/acccm.2026.080117.

REFERENCES

[1] GONG J, JIAN Y, CHEN W, et al. Transitions in rural settlements and implications for rural revitalization in Guangdong Province[J/OL]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2022, 93: 366-359. DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.037. 
[2] CHEN B. Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Investment and Sustainable Economic Development: An Empirical Study Based on Efficiency Evaluation and Spatial Spillover in China[J/OL]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(15): 8146. DOI:10.3390/su13158146. 
[3] UMAR A A, ZAWAWI N, AZIZ A A R. Do regional characteristics influence PPP contract governance skills requirements?[J/OL]. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 2023. DOI:10.1108/ecam-08-2022-0729. 
[4] XIA X, HUANG Z, JIA J, et al. The PPP projects for rural residential environment: An evolutionary game model from the synergy perspective of rural enterprises[J/OL]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2025, 281: 127433. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127433. 
[5] GAO C Y H G Z Z. Mechanisms of Rural Sustainable Development Driven by Land Use Restructuring: A Perspective of “Scale-Space” Interactions[J/OL]. Sustainability, 2023. DOI:10.3390/su151612600. 
[6] PONZINI G C. Public–Private Partnership: A Delusion for Urban Regeneration? Evidence from Italy[J/OL]. EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2011. DOI:10.1080/09654313.2011.548471. 
[7] SONG J, ZHANG H, DONG W. A review of emerging trends in global PPP research: analysis and visualization[J/OL]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 107(3): 1111-1147. DOI:10.1007/s11192-016-1918-1. 
[8] XINHUA Z, PEIFENG Z, YIGANG W, et al. Measuring the efficiency and driving factors of urban land use based on the DEA method and the PLS-SEM model-A case study of 35 large and medium-sized cities in China[J/OL]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019. DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101646. 
[9] WANG B W J L. Spatial–Temporal Evolution of Coupling Coordination Development between Regional Highway Transportation and New Urbanization: A Case Study of Heilongjiang, China[J/OL]. Sustainability, 2023. DOI:10.3390/su152316365. 
[10] EVANS M, SYRETT S. Generating social capital? The social economy and local economic development[J/OL]. EUROPEAN URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES, 2007. DOI:10.1177/0969776407072664. 
[11] GAO X, MA Y. Spatial pattern and influencing factor of county-level industrial development in Liaoning Province of China[J/OL]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2008, 18(1): 24-32. DOI:10.1007/s11769-008-0024-6.
[12] RUAN R, LIU L, ZHENG F, et al. How to channel state resources into rural society under the withering of grassroots governance: Lessons from the targeted poverty alleviation “pairing-up” support system in China[J/OL]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2024, 109: 103331. DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103331.

Downloads: 47525
Visits: 1001930

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.