Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Biomass-to-Hydrogen Conversion: Fundamentals, Technologies and Performance Trade-offs

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/mpcr.2026.060106 | Downloads: 1 | Views: 124

Author(s)

Guoying Pan 1, Xuebin Li 1, Shihao Wei 1, Kai Chen 1, Rongxiang Yang 1

Affiliation(s)

1 PLA Joint Logistics Support Force University of Engineering, Chongqing, 401331, China

Corresponding Author

Rongxiang Yang

ABSTRACT

Hydrogen is attracting increasing attention as a low-carbon energy carrier, but its environmental benefits depend strongly on the production pathway. Biomass provides a renewable feedstock for hydrogen production while enabling the utilization of agricultural residues, forestry wastes, algae, and organic wastes. Major biomass-to-hydrogen routes include gasification, pyrolysis–reforming, hydrothermal gasification, dark fermentation, photo-fermentation, photobiological conversion, and microbial electrolysis. These technologies differ substantially in reaction mechanisms, feedstock requirements, hydrogen productivity, energy demand, and technological maturity. This review examines the fundamental mechanisms of biomass-to-hydrogen conversion and summarizes recent advances in major thermochemical, biological, and bioelectrochemical routes. Particular emphasis is placed on the trade-offs among hydrogen yield, productivity, energy efficiency, environmental impact, and economic feasibility. The analysis indicates that technology selection should be tailored to feedstock characteristics, with thermochemical routes generally favored for dry biomass and hydrothermal or biological pathways offering advantages for wet and organic-rich feedstocks. Future development will depend on integrated biomass utilization and carbon management.

KEYWORDS

Biomass; Hydrogen production; Biohydrogen; Gasification; Fermentation; Hydrothermal conversion; Biomass valorization

CITE THIS PAPER

Guoying Pan, Xuebin Li, Shihao Wei, Kai Chen, Rongxiang Yang. Biomass-to-Hydrogen Conversion: Fundamentals, Technologies and Performance Trade-offs. Modern Physical Chemistry Research (2026) Vol. 6, No.1, 36-48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/mpcr.2026.060106.

REFERENCES

[1] International Energy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review 2026. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2026.
[2] International Energy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review 2024. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2024.
[3] Kamshybayeva GK, Sadvakasova AK, Belkozhayev AM, Kossalbayev BD, Bauenova MO, Zharmukhamedov SK, Hou HJM, Allakhverdiev SI. Progress and innovation in key technologies for converting biomass to hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2025;113:90–106. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.437.
[4] Puteri MN, Gew LT, Ong HC, Ming LC. Biomass-to-biohydrogen conversion: Comprehensive analysis of processes, environmental, and economic implications. Biomass Bioenergy. 2025;200:107943. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107943.
[5] James N, Karim NA, Timmiati SN, Lim KL, et al. An overview of the enhanced biomass gasification for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2024;49:1139–1164. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.043.
[6] Kumar P, Fiori L. Thermochemical and biological routes for biohydrogen production: A review. Energy Convers Manag X. 2024;23:100659. doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100659.
[7] Zhao ZT, Ding J, Wang BY, Bao MY, Liu BF, Pang JW, Ren NQ, Yang SS. Advances in the biomass valorization in dark fermentation systems: A sustainable approach for biohydrogen production. Chem Eng J. 2024;481:148444. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.148444.
[8] Swaminathan P, Ghosh A, Sunantha G, Sivagami K, Mohanakrishna G, Aishwarya S, et al. A comprehensive review of microbial electrolysis cells: Integrated for wastewater treatment and hydrogen generation. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2024;190:458–474. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2024.08.032.
[9] Nguyen NH, Vu MP, Luu QL, Pham DV, Pham TH, Nguyen HA. Assessment of hydrogen production technologies from agricultural residues in Vietnam. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2024;27:101919. doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2024.101919.
[10] Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D. Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2010.
[11] Sarker TR, Nanda S, Dalai AK. Hydrogen-rich gas production from hydrothermal gasification of fuel pellets obtained from co-pelletization of agricultural residues. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2024;52:80–93. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.134.
[12] Niu YH, Chi ZY, Li M, Du JZ, Han FT. Advancements in biomass gasification and catalytic tar-cracking technologies. Materials Reports: Energy 2024, 4, 100295.
[13] Suparmin P, Purwanti N, Nelwan LO, Tambunan AH. Syngas production by biomass gasification: A meta-analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2024;206:114824. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114824.
[14] Acevedo-Páez JC, Arenas-Castiblanco E, Posso F, Alarcón E, Villa AL, Jahromi H, Adhikari S. Effect of calcium and potassium on activity of mordenite-supported nickel catalyst for hydrogen production from biomass gasification. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2024;52:1248–1262. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.123.
[15] Yeşilova N, Tezer O, Öngen A, Ayol A. Enhancing biomass gasification: A comparative study of catalyst applications in updraft and modifiable-downdraft fixed bed reactors. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2024;76:290–303. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.075.
[16] Mbeugang CFM, Li B, Xie X, Wei J, Isa YM, Kozlov A, Penzik M. Catalysis/sorption enhanced pyrolysis-gasification of biomass for H2-rich gas production: Effects of various nickel-based catalysts addition and the combination with calcined dolomite. Fuel. 2024;372:132195. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132195.
[17] Liu Z, Yang Y, Chen Y, Yi L, Guo L, Chao Y, Chen H. A review on catalytic hydrogen production from supercritical water gasification of biomass. Biomass Bioenergy. 2024;190:107422.
[18] Mohanakrishna G, Pengadeth D. Mixed culture biotechnology and its versatility in dark fermentative hydrogen production. Bioresour Technol. 2024;394:130286. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2023.130286.
[19] Dursun N. Production of biological hydrogen from Quinoa residue using dark fermentation and estimation of its microbial diversity. Heliyon. 2024;10:e25018. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25018.
[20] Agyekum EB, Odoi-Yorke F. Review of over two decades of research on dark and photo fermentation for biohydrogen production: A combination of traditional, systematic, and bibliometric approaches. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2024;91:1149–1169. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.218.
[21] Chen QK, Xiang XH, Yan P, Liu SY. Enhancing strategies of photosynthetic hydrogen production from microalgae: Differences in hydrogen production between prokaryotic and eukaryotic algae. Bioresour Technol. 2024;406:131029. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131029.
[22] Dong X, Pang D, Luo G, Zhu X. Microbial water electrolysis cells for efficient wastewater treatment and H2 production. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2024;12:4203–4212. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c07953.
[23] Kazemi R, Mirmohamadsadeghi S, Amiri H. Sequential dark fermentation of municipal solid waste using starch-derived volatile fatty acids for lignocellulose pretreatment and biohydrogen production. Fuel. 2024;364:131092. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131092.
[24] Karka S, Kamesh R. Data analysis and machine learning aided integrated catalyst activity and process modelling for selective H2 production from biomass gasification. Biomass Bioenergy. 2024;187:107291. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107291.
[25] Dong L, Wang W, Xie Q, Du X, Wang Y, Niu XZ, Cao G. Self-adaptable HAc/NaAc buffer system enhanced biohydrogen production from dark fermentation of cellulose. Bioresour Technol. 2025;416:131738. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131738.
[26] Hernández-Fontes C, Wang N, Gómez-Garduño N, Pfeiffer H. Enhanced hydrogen production via assisted biomass gasification using lithium manganate as a bifunctional material. J Mater Chem A. 2024;12:13374–13390. doi:10.1039/D4TA00224E.
[27] Peláez R, Marín P, Ordóñez S. Hydrogen production through the integration of biomass gasification and residual steelmaking streams. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2025;176:151420.
[28] Wu D, Gao Z, Wu S, Xiao R. Negative net global warming potential hydrogen production through biomass gasification combined with chemical looping: Environmental and economic assessments. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2024;66:24–32. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.078.
[29] Martínez-Fraile C, Muñoz R, Simorte MT, Sanz I, García-Depraect O. Biohydrogen production by lactate-driven dark fermentation of real organic wastes derived from solid waste treatment plants. Bioresour Technol. 2024;403:130846. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130846.
[30] Rashidi M, Alavi N, Amereh F, Rafiee M, Amanidaz N, Partovi K, Mosanefi S, Bakhshoodeh R. Biohydrogen production from co-digestion of sugarcane vinasse and bagasse using anaerobic dark fermentation. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2024;25:101793. doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2024.101793.
[31] Quan C, Wang M, Gao N, Yang T, Fan X, Miskolczi N. Enhanced hydrogen production from biomass gasification by in-situ CO2 capture with Ni/Ca-based catalysts. Biomass Bioenergy. 2024;182:107110.
[32] Li X, Chen Z, Liu P, Wang Z, Sun T, Wu S, Wu Y, Lei T. Oriented pyrolysis of biomass for hydrogen-rich gas and biochar production: An energy, environment, and economic assessment based on life cycle assessment method. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2024;62:979–993.
[33] Üregen Güler N, Yumurtacı Z. Techno-economic evaluation of hydrogen production via biomass gasification: The role of carbon capture and storage in steam and oxygen gasification routes. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2025;188:152134. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.152134.
[34] Ghasemi A, Nikafshan Rad H, Akrami M. Biomass-to-Green Hydrogen: A Review of Techno-Economic-Enviro Assessment of Various Production Methods. Hydrogen. 2024;5:474–493. doi:10.3390/hydrogen5030027.

Downloads: 1150
Visits: 100670

Sponsors, Associates, and Links


All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.