Author(s)

Kai Zhang ^1,2

Affiliation(s)

¹ Department of Pedagogy, Foreign Philology and Translation, Kharkiv State University of Economics, Kharkiv, 61166, Ukraine
² Academic Affairs Office, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, 641100, China

Corresponding Author

Kai Zhang

ABSTRACT

Based on Eduard Deci's self-determination and Kuhn's learning input and harvest theory, this paper constructs the conceptual model of the learning effect of normal school students in a blended teaching environment. The results show that basic psychological needs, blended teaching, autonomous learning motivation, and technology acceptance have significant positive effects on learning engagement, while controlled learning motivation has no significant effects on learning engagement. Based on this, it is proposed that more attention should be paid to normal students' controlled learning motivation in the blended teaching environment, so as to promote the effect of the course.

KEYWORDS

Self-determination Theory; Learning Input; Learning Effectiveness; Learning Satisfaction

CITE THIS PAPER

Kai Zhang. Research on the Model of Learning Involvement and Learning Effect in the Blended Learning Environment—A Case Study of MOOC Blended Learning in Modern Educational Technology. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2021) 4: 74-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2021.040312.

REFERENCES

[1] Zhu Zhiting,&Yan Hanbing. (2015). Interpretation of Primary and Secondary School Teachers' IT Application Ability Standard (Trial). Audio-visual Education Research, 36(9), 5-10
[2] Wang Juan. (2019). On the global, historical and contemporary characteristics of teacher education policy —— Taking the Action Plan for Revitalizing Teacher Education (2018-2022) as the inspection center. Curriculum Teaching Research, (4), 4-9.
[3] Yang Zongkai, Wu Di, & Zheng Xudong. (2018). Educational Informationization 2.0: the key historical transition of information technology in the new era. Educational Research, 4, 16-22.
[4] Li Yi, Qiu Lanhuan, & Wang Qin. (2019). Construction and application of information literacy evaluation model for normal students in the era of educational informationization 2.0 —— Taking the western region as an example. Audio-visual education in China, 7,91-98
[5] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
[6] Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C. P., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[7] Wang Han. (2017). Research on the Positioning of Learners' Roles in the Smart Learning Environment. Software Guide. Educational Technology, 16(6), 27-29.
[8] Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2010). Defining student engagement. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 43(1), 38-43.
[9] Astin, A. W. (1986). Excerpts from Achieving educational excellence. Equity & Excellence, 22(4-6), 12-31.
[10] Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of college student development, 50(6), 683-706.
[11] Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.
[12] Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2016). Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 257-278.
[13] Wu Xiaomeng, Jiang Jing,&Wu Jiewei. (2011). Study on the Effectiveness and Influencing Factors of Students' Online Discussion under the Blended Learning Environment. Modern Distance Education Research, (5), 59-65.
[14] Guan Lei. (2021).Study on the model of library information literacy reversing classroom learning input and learning effect —— from the perspective of self-determination theory and learning input theory. Library Work and Research, 32(02): 56-67.
[15] Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
[16] Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & education, 51(2), 864-873.
[17] Liu Bin. (2008). Investigation and Analysis on the Implementation of Excellent Performance Model in Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises (Master's thesis, Nanjing University of Science and Technology).
[18] Kim, J. H., & Park, M. K. (2018). Effects of self-determination motivation to learning flow on in self-regulated learning: Mediating effect of metacognition. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(2), 349-357.
[19] Sulea, C., Van Beek, I., Sarbescu, P., Virga, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engagement, boredom, and burnout among students: Basic need satisfaction matters more than personality traits. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 132-138.
[20] Xu Xiaodong. (2010). Introduction to Cambridge Learning Science Handbook. Audio-visual Education in China, (6), 25-25.
[21] Yin Rui,&Xu Huanyun. (2017). Construction of online learning input structure model —— Empirical analysis based on structural equation model. Open Education Research, 23(4), 101-111.
[22] Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701.
[23] McGee, P., & Wickershame, L. (2005, October). Seeking deeper learning within an online course. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2205-2212). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
[24] Lee, W. H., Ku, H. C., & Shelton, R. N. (1988). Evolution of heavy-fermion behavior in the series CePt x Si: A ferromagnetic dense Kondo system. Physical Review B, 38(16), 11562.
[25] Dede, C. (2014). The Role of Digital Technologies in Deeper Learning. Students at the Center: Deeper Learning Research Series. Jobs for the Future.
[26] Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., Sánchez, J. Á. L., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students' satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141, 103608.
[27] Adobor, H., & Daneshfar, A. (2006). Management simulations: determining their effectiveness. Journal of Management Development.
[28] Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer, Boston, MA.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education