Author(s)

Jia Guo ¹, Chenyang Gao ¹, Liaoyuan Zhang ¹, Liping Feng ¹

Affiliation(s)

¹ Chinese Language & Culture College, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Corresponding Author

Liping Feng

ABSTRACT

In recent years, as more and more researchers pay attention to the linguistic phenomenon that different components in sentences are differentially processed, the processing mechanism of focal components has also been extensively focused. This paper reviews the researches on the neural mechanism of focus processing from the perspective of native speakers and second language speakers, combs several ERP components closely related to focus processing, and summarizes the mechanism of focus processing.

KEYWORDS

Focus, Processing, ERP, Differentiated Processing, Neural Mechanism

CITE THIS PAPER

Jia Guo, Chenyang Gao, Liaoyuan Zhang, Liping Feng, Review on the Neural Mechanism of Focus Processing. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology (2022) Vol. 6: 82-89. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2022.060513.

REFERENCES

[1] Birch S, Rayner K. Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading. Memory & Cognition, 2010, 38(6): 740-752.
[2] Bornkessel I, Schlesewsky M, Friederici A D, et al. Contextual Information Modulates Initial Processes of Syntactic Integration: The Role of Inter- Versus Intrasentential Predictions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2003, 29(5): 871-882.
[3] Bredart S, Modolo K. Moses strikes again: Focalization effect on a semantic illusion. Acta Psychologica, 1988, 67(2): 135-144.
[4] Bredart, S., & Docquier, M. The Moses illusion: A follow-up on the focalisation effect. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/ European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology,1989, (9): 357-362.
[5] Carretie L, Mercado F, Tapia M, et al. Emotion, attention, and the 'negativity bias', studied through event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2001, 41(1): 75-85.
[6] Chen L, Wang L, Yang Y, et al. Distinguish between focus and newness: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2014: 28-41.
[7] Chen L. On the processing of pragmatic information: ERP effects of emphasis processing. Language, cognition and neuroscience, 2018, 33(8): 1005-1016.
[8] Cowles H W, Kluender R, Kutas M, et al. Violations of information structure: An electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions. Brain and Language, 2007, 102(3): 228-242.
[9] Cutler A, Fodor J A. Semantic focus and sentence comprehension. Cognition, 1979, 7(1): 49-59.
[10] Drenhaus H, Zimmermann M, Vasishth S, et al. Exhaustiveness effects in clefts are not truth-functional. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2011, 24(3): 320-337.
[11] Ferreira F, Lowder M W. Chapter Six – Prediction, Information Structure, and Good-Enough Language Processing. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2016:217-247.
[12] Ferreira, F. The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology,2003,47:164-203.
[13] Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. The good enough approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass,2007, 1:71-83.
[14] Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2002, 11:11-15.
[15] Fraundorf S H, Watson D G, Benjamin A S, et al. Recognition memory reveals just how CONTRASTIVE contrastive accenting really is. Journal of Memory and Language, 2010, 63(3): 367-386.
[16] Friederici A D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2002, 6(2): 78-84.
[17] Friederici, A. D. The neurobiology of language processing. // In A. D. Friederici (Ed.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective. Berlin: Springer, 1999: 263-301.
[18] Halliday M A. Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 1967, 3(3): 199-244.
[19] Hillyard, S. A., & Münte, T. F. Selective attention to color and location: an analysis with event-related brain potentials. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,1984, 36(2): 185-198.
[20] Hruska C, Alter K, Steinhauer K, et al. Can wrong prosodic information be mistaken by the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2000.
[21] Hruska, C. EinXüsse kontextueller und prosodischer Informationen in der auditorischen Satzverarbeitung: Untersuchungen mit ereigniskorrelierten Hirnpotentialen. MPI Series in Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 2004: 48. quoted in Stolterfoht B, Friederici A D, Alter K, et al. Processing focus structure and implicit prosody during reading: Differential ERP effects. Cognition, 2007, 104(3): 565-590.
[22] Johnson, S. M., Clifton, C., Breen, M., & Morris, J. An ERP investigation of prosodic and semantic focus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (Suppl. 174), 2003:157
[23] Kristensen L B, Wang L, Petersson K M, et al. The Interface Between Language and Attention: Prosodic Focus Marking Recruits a General Attention Network in Spoken Language Comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 2013, 23(8): 1836-1848.
[24] Lee A, Perdomo M, Kaan E, et al. Native and second-language processing of contrastive pitch accent: An ERP study:. Second Language Research, 2019.
[25] Li W, Yang Y. Perception of prosodic hierarchical boundaries in Mandarin Chinese sentences. Neuroscience, 2009, 158(4): 1416-1425.
[26] Luck S J, Hillyard S A. Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 1994, 31(3): 291-308.
[27] Mckoon G, Ward G, Ratcliff R, et al. Morphosyntactic and Pragmatic Factors Affecting the Accessibility of Discourse Entities. Journal of Memory and Language, 1993, 32(1): 56-75.
[28] Nieuwenhuis S, Astonjones G, Cohen J D, et al. Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus--norepinephrine system.. Psychological Bulletin, 2005, 131(4): 510-532.
[29] Price J, Sanford A J. Reading in healthy ageing: the influence of information structuring in sentences. Psychology and Aging, 2012, 27(2): 529-540.
[30] Sanford A, Price J, Sanford A J, et al. Enhancement and suppression effects resulting from information structuring in sentences. Memory & Cognition, 2009, 37(6): 880-888.
[31] Steinhauer K, Alter K, Friederici A D, et al. Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 1999, 2(2): 191-196.
[32] Stolterfoht B, Friederici A D, Alter K, et al. Processing focus structure and implicit prosody during reading: Differential ERP effects. Cognition, 2007, 104(3): 565-590.
[33] Stolterfoht, B., & Bader, M. Focus structure and the processing of word order variations in German. // In A. Steube (Ed.), Information Structure: Theoretical and Empirical Aspects. Berlin: deGruyter, 2004: 259–275.
[34] Sturt, P., Sanford, A. J., Stewart, A., & Dawydiak, E. Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the changedetection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2004, 11: 882–888.
[35] Umbach C. On the Notion of Contrast in Information Structure and Discourse Structure. Journal of Semantics, 2004, 21(2): 155-175.
[36] Wang L, Bastiaansen M C, Yang Y, et al. Information Structure Influences Depth of Syntactic Processing: Event-Related Potential Evidence for the Chomsky Illusion. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7(10)
[37] Wang L, Hagoort P, Yang Y, et al. Semantic illusion depends on information structure: ERP evidence. Brain Research, 2009: 50-56.
[38] Wu Y, Yang X, Yang Y, et al. Importance conveyed in different ways: Effects of hierarchy and focus. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2018: 37-49.
[39] Yang C L, Zhang H, Duan H, et al. Linguistic Focus Promotes the Ease of Discourse Integration Processes in Reading Comprehension: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019. doi:10.3389/fpsyg. 2018.02718
[40] Zheng Z L, Yang X, Li W J, et al. Processing corrective focus and information focus at different positions: an electrophysiological investigation. Language, cognition and neuroscience, 2019, 34(8): 1059-1072.
[41] Chen Lijing. The Influence of Focus Structure on Discourse Processing. Doctoral Dissertation of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012.
[42] Xu Jie. Principles of Universal Grammar and Chinese Grammatical Phenomenon (Revised Edition). Peking University Press, 2018.

Sponsors, Associates, and Links

---

• Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
  
  
• Transactions on Comparative Education
  
  
• Applied & Educational Psychology
  
  
• Advances in Vocational and Technical Education
  
  
• Adult and Higher Education