Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

A Comparative Study of the "Double Creation" Education System in the "Double High" Construction between China and the United States

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/aduhe.2022.041101 | Downloads: 18 | Views: 816

Author(s)

Yuli Lu 1, Bisheng Wei 1, Xiaoming Wen 1, Rui Lan 2

Affiliation(s)

1 Jiangxi College of Applied Technology, Ganzhou, China
2 Jiangxi College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China

Corresponding Author

Yuli Lu

ABSTRACT

At present, the construction of "double high" is in full swing, and vocational education has more practical advantages. How to further improve the quality of innovation and entrepreneurship education has become the key. This paper makes a comparative analysis of China and the United States in terms of curriculum setting, motivation purpose, teacher source and participants in innovation and entrepreneurship education, and tries to provide corresponding theoretical basis for the development of innovation and entrepreneurship in the future.

KEYWORDS

Innovation and entrepreneurship, Double high School plan, Chinese and foreign comparison, Curriculum reform

CITE THIS PAPER

Yuli Lu, Bisheng Wei, Xiaoming Wen, Rui Lan, A Comparative Study of the "Double Creation" Education System in the "Double High" Construction between China and the United States. Adult and Higher Education (2022) Vol. 4: 1-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2022.041101.

REFERENCES

[1] Lei Li, Nan He. A comparative study on the curriculum system of innovation and entrepreneurship education in Chinese and foreign universities [J]. Modern Commerce and Trade Industry. 2018, 39(09): 160-164.
[2] https://www.sohu.com/a/211508555_507651
[3] Inspiration of American Innovation Ecosystem: How World class Enterprises Are Generated - Internet Document Resources (http://www.360doc.co) - 2018.
[4] Rubing Han. Practical research on the combination of innovation and entrepreneurship education and professional course system [J]. Higher education research: Southwest University of Science and Technology. 2017: 73-75.
[5] Fuping Tian, et al. Comparison of teaching effect evaluation forms between Chinese and foreign universities [J]. Higher Education in Chemical Industry, 2008 (03): 6-9+78.
[6] Minjun Wang, Jin Wang. An Effective Path for the Construction of Teachers in Higher Vocational Colleges [J]. Western Quality Education, 2022, 8(14): 111-113.
[7] Chunping Jia. Research on the development model of entrepreneurial universities [D]. Southeast University, 2019.
[8] Xuemei Yang. Huanghe University of Science and Technology: Cultivating High Quality "Mass Entrepreneurship" Talents to Create a Brand of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Education [J]. Henan Education (Higher Education), 2017 (09): 44-45.
[9] Chenzhong Li. An Analysis of the Training Mode of "Double qualified" Teachers [J]. Modern Vocational Education, 2019(33): 16-17.
[10] Kaicheng Gai. Guide private capital into innovation and entrepreneurship [J]. Financial Science, 2015, (12): 5-7.

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.